Skip to main content

Now that my layout is pretty well done, I want to add on: An elevated run with a reversing loop at the end that will effectively turn my layout from a "double loop" to a "three times around point to point" with the right combination of switches.

 

Unfortunately I've run into the switch footprint problem AGAIN. The Lionel O-27 gauge 42" switch footprint puts it smack on top of the inner loop track.

 

Easy answer: Gargraves 42" turnout, and some adapter pins.

 

Someone told me Gargraves was the solution to space problems in the switching yard, so I thought they were good.

 

Now yesterday I came across a thread where someone was having a problem with derailments, and someone mentioned something akin to "Gargraves always have a problem with derailments, get Ross instead."

 

Um, ok?

 

This is on my mainline, and I have enough self-induced derailments. I don't need some switch throwing my trains off the rails every 10 seconds.

 

Are the Gargraves switches usable, or aren't they?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

IF you can accomodate it, I would suggest using the FasTrack manual 036 switch. We use it on our club Christmas display with back-to-back reversing loops. It ran all day, every day with zero wiring and zero derailments. There are FasTrack-tinplate adaptor sections that work very well.

 

As for Gargraves, I bought and use their switches for my TimeSaver layout and have purchased Ross switches for my home layout. IMHO, Ross are more realistic looking and they offer a much broader selection of switches. I'll let others chime in, but I believe that Gargraves have made improvements that resolve earlier derailment issues.

 

In any event (Gargraves or Ross), I would strongly suggest using the Atlas 6924 non-derail circuit board.

FWIW, at one time or another I've heard about derailment issues for almost all brands of switches. Sometimes it relates to what you're running and not necessarily the switch. Examples include oversized flanges and sliding pickup shoes.

 

 

Gilly

Last edited by Gilly@N&W

In the past couple of years I have designed a new layout and did much research on track and switches.  I went all the way with Gargraves.  Mike at Gargraves convinced me design modifications, a new cast frog I think, had eliminated the derailment problem.  I run strictly pre and post war Lionel and no problems to date.  All of my switches are 42's and larger.

 

Jim Lawson

Originally Posted by ADCX Rob:

If it is strictly for a reverse loop, Fastrack would be the logical choice.  All his other switches are manual, Ross manual switches are not non-derailing, unless you can rig them as a spring switches.

 

Setting up a Ross or Gargraves switch as a spring switch is as simple as pulling the spring out of a push button pen, hooking the slidebar and putting a screw through the last few coils on the other end. Just enough tension on the spring to hold the points closed one way is soft enough to let the switch open coming back through.

Alternatively, and probably more reliably, a powered Ross or Gargraves switch can easily be setup for powered non-derailing action with a DZ1000.

 

Ross  or Gargraves is about the same height as O27 track, they transition fairly easily.

Last edited by Boilermaker1
Originally Posted by Boilermaker1:
Originally Posted by ADCX Rob:

If it is strictly for a reverse loop, Fastrack would be the logical choice.  All his other switches are manual, Ross manual switches are not non-derailing, unless you can rig them as a spring switches.

 

Setting up a Ross or Gargraves switch as a spring switch is as simple as pulling the spring out of a push button pen, hooking the slidebar and putting a screw through the last few coils on the other end....

Perfect!

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×