Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Anthony:

Is this the correct progression of toy train gauges from smallest to largest?

 

  • TT (table Top)
  • Z
  • N
  • HO
  • S
  • 0
  • 1 or G (ONE gauge same as GARDEN?)
  • STANDARD (as per JLC)

Thanks

 

 

If I remember correctly...

 

Z 1:220

 

N 1:160

 

TT 1:120

 

HO 1:87

 

S 1:64

 

O 1:48

 

G 1:32

 

Standard 1:?

 

Live Steam(if it counts) 1:16

Not quite.

 

Z is the smallest gauge that is widely used: 6 mm between the rails. 1/220 scale

 

N is next at 9 mm.  In fact the N came from "Nine" or possibly "Neun" in German. 1/160 scale

 

TT is next at 1/120 scale.

 

HO is 1/87 scale.

 

S is 1/64 with a tiny bit over 7/8" between the rails.

 

O gauge is 1 1/4" between the rails.

 

1 gauge or G is 45 mm or a little over 1 7/8" between the rails.

 

Standard gauge is 2 1/8" and was an invention of JLC.  There was nothing standard about it since it was different from all other gauges around at the time.

 

There is a recent minority scale that is truly tiny.  T gauge trains are 1/450 scale and the rails are 3 mm (T for "Three") apart!

 

http://www.t-gauge.net/

Originally Posted by Anthony:

Is this the correct progression of toy train gauges from smallest to largest?

 

  • TT (table Top)
  • Z
  • N
  • HO
  • S
  • 0
  • 1 or G (ONE gauge same as GARDEN?)
  • STANDARD (as per JLC)

Thanks

NO:

 

From smallest to largest (most common consumer/commercially available scales): 

 

Z, N, TT, HO, S, O, Std., #1(G, F, etc.)

 

I do NOT include the many specialized/limited interest/novelty scale variations that are not common to the mass consumer market of the hobby of model railroading, such as T, Z, or whatever.  That list is virtually endless, with most being single-manufacturer products.

Last edited by Allan Miller

From smallest to largest (most common consumer/commercially available scales):

 

Z, N, TT, HO, S, O, Std., #1(G, F, etc.)

 

Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief O Gauge Railroading magazine

"T" scale is commercially available, it is no longer just in Japan. And it has Magne-traction !!! 

http://www.tgauge.com/ 

"At a scale of 1:450 T Gauge is the smallest commercially available model railway ... Our original T-shaped layout, "T for Three" that we showed around the UK is ... 

http://www.bukisa.com/articles...-gauge-train-layouts 

"T-gauge is the smallest working model train scale, with 3mm-wide track.  There are smaller-scale miniature trains, like the novelty TY-scale, but they do not run on actual track, merely drive belts, and are considered more novelty than practical scales to work with. 

"T-gauge was introduced by a Japanese company, Eishindo, and it is possible that other companies will soon begin producing T-gauge trains.

Last edited by Ace

As we all know:

 

US 1:48 O "scale" and O "gauge" don't match up. It makes the

gauge equal to 5 feet, which is wrong. That's why the 1:43.5 "scale" used in much of Europe and Britain is correct for O "gauge".

 

Then the British love OO scale, but run it on HO track, I think, which makes that gauge or scale wrong for 4'8.5" standard gauge (not to be confused with Standard Gauge). So welcome to our world.

 

Monorail modeling would eliminate all this wackiness.

 

Originally Posted by Ace:

If you want to include more of the scale and gauge variations like On30 and Nn3, and some of the obsolete scales and gauges:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...ort_modelling_scales

 

I believe there used to be a "Q" gauge which sought to correct the discrepancy between 1:48 scale and 1.25" gauge by using a slightly different gauge or scale?

Q gauge was 1/4" scale, but the track gauge was the correct 4'8.5".  Proto:48 has pretty much replaced Q gauge.

 

Rusty

Can we please get our terms correct here?


"GAUGE" is nothing more than the distance between the rails. I know, I know...it is used incorrectly ALL THE TIME, but wrong is still wrong. Shoot, even the title of our magazine is "wrong" so to speak.

 

"SCALE" is the relative size of the model compared to the real thing. That is what we're talking about here, not the gauge of the rails.

Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:

Can we please get our terms correct here?


"GAUGE" is nothing more than the distance between the rails. I know, I know...it is used incorrectly ALL THE TIME, but wrong is still wrong. Shoot, even the title of our magazine is "wrong" so to speak.

 

"SCALE" is the relative size of the model compared to the real thing. That is what we're talking about here, not the gauge of the rails.

I appreciate the frustration, but without the OP clarifying, how do we know which one he meant? 

 

From the wording of his question, he very well might have meant how far between the rails, even though the question of scale would probably be more commonly asked.

 

-Dave

Well Ace, L-to-R they are:

-Aristo-Craft 1/29 scale, or G or #1 or Large Scale, whatever you want to call it

-Marx #21, about O-scale

-Marx #1095, 027

-American Flyer #360, S

-Athearn, HO

-Lionel TT, 1/120 scale

-Life-Like, N

-Marklin, Z

 

My first goal in collecting was the Warbonnets in all the scales.  My wife helped enormously, gifting me the G, S and Z at Christmases.

I see the Alpha scales are covered here.

 

There is also the numeric scale some of which is an overlap.

 

#0000 Four ought  (This was a size designated over 60 years ago but to my knowledge was never built)

#000  Three ought

#00  Double ought

Half 0  Half ought

#0  Ought

#1

#2

#3

Then we have 1" and 1 1/2" at the Rahns PA club.

Originally Posted by Norton:

TY is now the smallest at 1:900. It would be close to G scale on an O scale layout.

 

Pete

I wouldn't classify TY as a "real" scale/gauge.  I have one of these layouts (got it as a **** gift from a well meaning in-law) and the train rides in a slot between the "rails" with power from a belt that sits below the layout surface.  "T" gauge is the smallest rail-riding self-propelled model train out there at the moment.

Originally Posted by cta4391:
Originally Posted by Norton:

TY is now the smallest at 1:900. It would be close to G scale on an O scale layout.

 

Pete

I wouldn't classify TY as a "real" scale/gauge.  I have one of these layouts (got it as a **** gift from a well meaning in-law) and the train rides in a slot between the "rails" with power from a belt that sits below the layout surface.  "T" gauge is the smallest rail-riding self-propelled model train out there at the moment.

I would agree as they are not self propelled but they would make an accurate sized garden railroad on an O scale layout. T would be closer to live steam.

 

Pete

T scale makes N look large !  That's Z in the middle. http://www.t-gauge.net/faq.htm

 

scales

On an O scale layout, T scale could represent a 1:10 scale miniature railway with a track gauge of 5.7".  That's not too far off from 5" gauge used for some real-life rideable trains.

 

Here's a spaghetti bowl layout for T scale in 45"x 24". Possibilities for an amusement park railway in O-gauge.

http://www.t-gauge.net/plan_9.htm

plan_9

Attachments

Images (2)
  • scales
  • plan_9

Back to the original question of track gauges and scales ...

These are the prototype gauges that can be represented by using a different modelling gauge with 1:48 scale.

 

Scale/Gauge -         gauge represented in 1:48 scale

G     45mm     1.77"     7'1"

O     32mm     1.25"     5'0"

S     22.4mm   7/8"      3'6"

HO  16.5mm   0.65"      31"

TT   12 mm     0.47"     23"

N      9 mm      0.35"    17"

Z      6.5mm    0.26"    12"

T      3 mm      0.12"     5.7"

Last edited by Ace
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×