Skip to main content

A few weeks ago, I put my scale equipment on the display shelf and ran semi-scale/traditional items......today I decided to eliminate coal, diesel and fuel oil.......I decided to go electric.  This is the 1st of three videos(I have 6 command-equipt electrics).

 

The New York Central passenger set pulled by the Lionel S2 is scale.

The Penny passenger consist is semi-scale. The GG1 is a K-line Collector's Club offering.

Peter

Last edited by Putnam Division
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Peter,

  On second thought, if you need catenary and transmission towers...don't jump on the electric band wagon. Some consider it to be voodoo power. A careful analysis of the most up to date modern science, Engineering News-Record (1920) shows:

 

Electrification increases the capacity of a terminal, but an analysts of the situation of the, New York Central shows that this is not due to decreasing locomotive requirements through the use of multiple unite as is usually stated. . . In the handling of heavy tonnage trains by the unlimited combining of electric locomotive units, the factors of peak load, transmission lines, and power plant capacity must all be considered with the probability that permissible modern steam locomotive train units can be more economically (run).

 

 Don't put that steam power on the dead line yet! 

 

Tom

Peter,

Love the electrics. I also tend run my trains in cycles steam, electric. diesel. Don't know why but I get an urge to switch motive power and then cycle through all my engines of that type. Love Electric almost as much as steam. I have two scale GG-1s, four boxcabs, and a rectifier. All are Pennsy. I also have a GN EP-5.

Peter,

 

Nice electrics. I envy your NYC S2. My railroad needs more electric locomotives. So far it only has a GG1 and an EP-5. In my opinion, the New Haven and the New York Central had the crème de la crème of electric locomotives, so I am on the hunt for some of them. NYC "T" Motors and the New Haven EP3 & EP4 strike my fancy. I also would like to have a Milwaukee Road Little Joe.

 

My tastes in electric locomotives are more than my wallet can handle. Another Achilles Heal is that I run MTH PS 2 & PS 3 locomotives exclusively, so no S2 for me until MTH makes one.

Last edited by Bobby Ogage

Everyone here, myself included, seems to be praising Peters layout and electric collection. It is hoped that no one interprets any comment here are being critical.

As for the question of the catenary; maybe some of us got envious when we saw Marty Fitzhenry's powered catenary system.  Meanwhile the layout in my basement remains "catenary free" as well.

If one sticks to NYC electrics (and why wouldn't one?), there is no catenary issue, as they ran using an under-running outside third rail. There was a little pantograph on the roof

of NYC electrics, however, as in complicated 3rd rail switch/crossover areas, a bit of

catenary was strung to avoid the problem down below. (Gee - three rails and switches - who would think that THAT would be an issue?)

 

So, with NYC and some NH electrics, having a third rail is prototypical, to say the least.

The fact that it is in the wrong place is not.

 

Not that this is an original thought, but electric model electrics hit me right because they are the only "locos" that we have that are configured, in general, like the real thing. Motors geared/attached to  axles, drawing power from an outside source. There's no diesel fuel in our diesels and no steam in our steamers.

Thank you, everyone for the comments.....

I believe one of you guys have nailed it........I have invisible catenary......

 

Tom.....the layout is 6X16......it is 3 unconnected levels......The benchwork is by Mianne.

 

The main level is 6X16. The engine yard is 2X16. The subway is 6X8.

 

It doesn't look like I have accomplished much over the last 2 years......but I lost a year's worth of work when my Atlas switch machine fried.... I have just finished re-wiring the Atlas switches with D1000s.  My next task is wiring the engine yard switches to an SC-2.

 

Next will be wiring the accessories.....then scenery.  I figure 2-3 years to complete.

 

 

Oakengate3

 

 

The plan has been altered to eliminate the curved switches (per gap was too long for my small locos) and I removed the rear passing siding.

 

2X16 Tubular Yard reversed

 

I used tubular track because I have a ton and since this is at eye level, once ballasted, the tubular track will be essentially invisible.

 

 

Subway 2010 best plan

 

 

IMG_3198

 

 

I made a large copy of the plan to work from......

 

 BTW....my dad's family lived in Larchmont....north of the station next to the 4 track main line.....I grew up watching McGinnis liveried Jets and NH washboards.

Peter

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Oakengate3
  • 2X16 Tubular Yard reversed
  • Subway 2010  best plan
  • IMG_3198
Last edited by Putnam Division
Originally Posted by Jim Policastro:

For all the critics of Peter's electric locomotives, let it be known that he signed up long ago as a client of this outfit on my railroad. Their slogan: "No wires?...no problem!"

 

They wanted to include also...."No need to keep your "pants" up", but thought better of it.

 

 

Jim

 

So you run with your pants down? 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×