Skip to main content

Just picked up the BTO Lionel Legacy Pocahontas Set yesterday and just took out the Norfolk & Western J locomotive from the set. I set it on the track next to my 2008 Premier MTH Powhatan Norfolk & Western J locomotive for comparison of looks, features and performance. Here is my (quick) comparison:

In terms of looks:
The Legacy version is much more toy-like in appearance, and it hits you almost immediately. The wheels on the leading and trailing trucks have none of the detail seen on the Premier version.  The trucks themselves have a much lower degree of detail.  The driving wheels are not chemically dyed to give them a darker appearance. the engine is completely missing the bell - poor oversight?  The detail along the top and front is less.  And the tender trucks are missing the little chains that give the MTH version from 2008 a much more real appearance.  The coal load, while real on the Legacy version, is very uniform in a molded shape, making it look a lot less real than that on the Premier tender. Even the tool box on the rear tender lid is not present.  I would say the only item where Lionel may have been more prototypical (and I'm no expert on whether this is the case) is the skid tread along the sides of the locomotive. The Lionel loco has actual perforations in the metal whereas, the MTH version has a textured finish.  Also, Lionel offers a feature as standard fare that I don't think I've seen on many Premier locomotives - but that I really dig - the variable glowing ash pan under the cab. Legacy has the better detailed cab interior but more in terms of painted gauges than in terms of more detail.
Winner: MTH, hands down.

In terms of sounds:
  • Both have a quillable whistle, but Legacy is clearly easier to operate.  In terms of the whistle sound itself, this is probably a matter of preference so I won't comment Other than to say neither offers a smooth up/down the scale sound.
  • In terms of crew talk, etc., I prefer the Premier random chatter over the need to launch the same basic sounds that are on all VL and Legacy engines I own.
  • Engine random sounds - Legacy has a bunch of creaking and groaning sounds that give this thing a real feel.  I don't know that MTH has much of this, although it does automatically launch a clickety-clack sound when the locomotive stays at a constant speed over 30 SMPH.

Winner: not sure there is a clear cut winner, but I prefer Legacy.

Engine Performance:
Maybe not fair to compare after operating the Legacy locomotive for one session, but as usual, Legacy is as smooth as silk. Great very low speed operation.  No unwarranted fault messages like often occur with DCS.  Having said that, the Premier is very smooth from 3 SMPH up and shows no performance issues whatsoever after having been run for approximately 120 scale miles so far.  Smoke, while not nearly as good as MTH (I think MTH is always the clear cut winner on smoke units), is not anemic and actually better than I expected.  I've come to expect little more than a wisp from Lionel locomotives, but this thing is a very decent smoker. Bell sounds are neutral (don't think one is better than the other - although, with the lack of a bell on the Legacy loco, it makes for a curious experience hearing the ghost bell).
Winner : Legacy (due to smooth operation).

Overall: MTH wins easily in the looks department. It just looks a lot more realistic than the Legacy version overall. Lionel wins in the department that matters most when you have young children as I do - smooth and predictable operation. Having said that,  the Legacy unit has 7 years of possible innovation and advancement advantage over MTH's Premier engine that came out in 2008 - yet it seems like the MTH locomotive has done a better job of providing a more prototypical and highly detailed locomotive that we've come to expect today.  And the Legacy set is 50% more costly than the Premier set was.  Even considering inflation, aluminum cars (also less detailed, but beauties!) etc., I would have expected better detailing for the price paid for the Legacy set - but overall happy with it.  So, don't know that there's a clear-cut winner here as each has it's pros and cons, but if I'm being honest, I am somewhat disappointed with the level of detail or lack of it on the Legacy Pocahontas set.  Will post some compare photos a little later (Pocahontas photos are first, Powhatan follow). 

Hope this was helpful.

Peter


imageimageimageimageimageimage

Attachments

Images (6)
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
Last edited by PJB
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A few points:

The bells on all the J's were moved from the top to a spot near the front underneath the skirt, sometime in the 1950's, according to Christophern&w. The Lionel is correct for the later version of the #611.

The excursion version of 611, at least, had solid lead truck wheels, rather than spoked, so this is correct.

I like the rods on the MTH version better.

I'm indifferent to detailed cab interiors for a running model engine.

Blackened wheel rims are a plus.

The MTH version does have a somewhat nicer coal pile, but you can more readily improve the looks of the Lionel coal.

How does either model compare to drawings for accuracy?

Originally Posted by rex desilets:

A few points:

The bells on all the J's were moved from the top to a spot near the front underneath the skirt, sometime in the 1950's, according to Christophern&w. The Lionel is correct for the later version of the #611.

The excursion version of 611, at least, had solid lead truck wheels, rather than spoked, so this is correct.

I like the rods on the MTH version better.

I'm indifferent to detailed cab interiors for a running model engine.

Blackened wheel rims are a plus.

The MTH version does have a somewhat nicer coal pile, but you can more readily improve the looks of the Lionel coal.

How does either model compare to drawings for accuracy?

Good to know about the bell!  I think it is hiding under the skin above the front truck.  While this may be accurate, it's sort of like a very detailed cab interior - not visible on a running model so who really cares. 

 

Don't know how either compare to technical specifications, not that it really matters when comparing how the two look sitting next to each other and the impression they both make.

 

By the way, the Lionel catalogue shows the locomotive with the spoked wheels and what looks like a bell.

 

Peter 

Very nice review.  Thank you for sharing.  I have thought about purchasing the new MTH Premiere version that is coming out soon so this review is helpful.  On the Legacy engine, the bell is near the front truck.  On Lionel Legacy 612 you can see it in the photo below.  These photos are not mine, but I took them from another thread….

 

Legacy612_1

On Lionel Legacy 611, you can faintly see it in this photo near the front truck….

 

611_2

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Legacy612_1
  • 611_2
Well, I think I spoke too soon. Operated it for the second time last night and the movement was a little jerky. Then the smoke stopped working and the cab lights began flickering like a disco, and would keep doing this regardless of speed (would not turn off).  Dealer doesn't have another for an exchange so I will be contacting Lionel today to see what can be done for a train set I've owned 4 days and have run twice. Very disappointing to be sure, but Lionel turn-around time has been decent in my experience.

It occurred to me last night that the BTO paradigm is creating a potential (unanticipated) customer cost. Dealers can't necessarily do exchanges. This means customers are now forced to send defective products back to Lionel when they might have otherwise done a simple exchange. And Lionel, to my knowledge, isn't offering to bear the shipping fees for these situations caused by the BTO paradigm. Going to noodle this some more ...

Peter
Last edited by PJB

The all-to-frequent need to send new items into Lionel for repair becomes more unsavory with the recent price increases by the shipping companies.

Yes, I realize that Vision line products are covered both ways and yes, I realize and appreciate that Lionel service has a fast turn-time on warranty work right now. 

However, it seems like they should consider a policy of reimbursing the shipping cost to get it to them if the repair was indeed not caused by operator error or mistreatment.

Every new Lionel purchase I make is made with the mindset that I'll probably have to send it in for repair within the first six weeks.

 

 

Is it possible to get a refund from the place you bought it from? Just asking, not telling you to do it. I hope you get satisfactory service from Lionel/its dealer.
 
Since I am fairly new to the Lionel products and after reading this forum, I have asked my dealer to test my locos before shipping to me, and they did.
 
 
 
Originally Posted by PJB:
Well, I think I spoke too soon. Operated it for the second time last night and the movement was a little jerky. Then the smoke stopped working and the cab lights began flickering like a disco, and would keep doing this regardless of speed (would not turn off).  Dealer doesn't have another for an exchange so I will be contacting Lionel today to see what can be done for a train set I've owned 4 days and have run twice. Very disappointing to be sure, but Lionel turn-around time has been decent in my experience.

It occurred to me last night that the BTO paradigm is creating a potential (unanticipated) customer cost. Dealers can't necessarily do exchanges. This means customers are now forced to send defective products back to Lionel when they might have otherwise done a simple exchange. And Lionel, to my knowledge, isn't offering to bear the shipping fees for these situations caused by the BTO paradigm. Going to noodle this some more ...

Peter

 

Originally Posted by Gilly@N&W:

       

BTW, the aluminum "J" cylinder plate on the 602 is correct. I thought they were brass/bronze but when I saw the 611 at the send-off last year; aluminum cylinder plates.

 

As for the tool-box. That was most likely a locomotive specific variation.

 

Gilly 


       


Presumably, this is as a follow-up to my review and how the Legacy version isn't nearly as detailed as the Premier version. There was another comment or two along these lines - justification for the lesser detailing based on the fact that some version of the prototype actually had less detailing.  I'd like to state my opinion on this type of comment:

On the one hand, I think we all appreciate that someone has done the research to confirm that a lower degree of detail can be justified based on a real prototype.  On the other hand, and by analogy, if the Franklin Mint were to do a high-end die cast model of a Mopar Challenger, they could do the base 318 model. Or, since you are paying top of market for a high-end model, they could instead do the Hemi version, with the hood scoops, the badging, the trunk wing, the dual exhaust (chrome trumpet) tips, etc. Both could be justified as correct.  But clearly, they do not have the same appeal.

Peter

My Legacy 611 has a bell.  I repainted it in Union Pacific Greyhound.  I don't remember if the bell was there when I repainted it or I added it, but I lean toward it having been there - I'd remember if I added it, I think. 

 

 

J bell

 

 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by graz:

The all-to-frequent need to send new items into Lionel for repair becomes more unsavory with the recent price increases by the shipping companies.

I've had one loco with issues out of 44 Legacy and Vision locos and three out of perhaps 50 non-Legacy locos, sets, and accessories with Lionel, which is frankly slightly better than I've had with MTH (better lately) and WBB (all recently).  I think it is the nature of the industry and the pressure to work with lowest-cost suppliers.  Regardless, I don't worry about it.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • J bell
Last edited by Lee Willis

Bell or no bell, there are hundreds of details that any model train company can choose/not choose to add to their product to improve model fidelity and to impress its customers, especially if they are paying top $$.

 

It has been said here a few times that scale details on a Premier MTH model is "generally" better than on a scale Lionel and for less $$...

 

It has also been said that the Legacy sounds are better than MTH PS2/3

Last edited by BigBoy4014
Originally Posted by Gilly@N&W:

BTW, the aluminum "J" cylinder plate on the 602 is correct. I thought they were brass/bronze but when I saw the 611 at the send-off last year; aluminum cylinder plates.

 

As for the tool-box. That was most likely a locomotive specific variation.

 

Gilly 

When built, I believe the class & builder's plates were all nickel plated. This photo taken before the 611 left town.

 

IMGP1786

 

I don't understand the questioning about the Lionel bell. It has been clearly shown that the models all have a bell. Depends on what version as to where it is placed

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMGP1786
Last edited by Big Jim
Originally Posted by PJB:
...
It occurred to me last night that the BTO paradigm is creating a potential (unanticipated) customer cost. Dealers can't necessarily do exchanges. This means customers are now forced to send defective products back to Lionel when they might have otherwise done a simple exchange. And Lionel, to my knowledge, isn't offering to bear the shipping fees for these situations caused by the BTO paradigm.  ...

Nice review... And a good point about BTO products as it pertains to availability of dealer extras for exchange when something goes amiss.  Puts the onus back on Lionel customer service to do the fixing, and the customer to pay for the shipping.   

 

But for the record, the Pocahontas set was not BTO.  Delivery was long overdue for this set catalog'd back in 2012, if I recall correctly.  And most folks -- including dealers -- probably all but forgot about it.  I suspect most small dealers and LHS's may have only ordered one or two of these sets, so there's very little wiggle-room.  

 

David 

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
Originally Posted by PJB:


In terms of sounds:
  • Both have a quillable whistle,  In terms of the whistle sound itself, this is probably a matter of preference so I won't comment Other than to say neither offers a smooth up/down the scale sound.

Winner: not sure there is a clear cut winner, but I prefer Legacy.

 I sense a bit of bias here.

 

 ..... is the bell tone a matter of preference too? Sounds are certainly more accurate/ better executed.... on one of the models.....depending on your "preference".

 

 

 Lionel legacy 611

 

Note the bell location( and tone) at 3:17

 

 

 

Last edited by RickO
Originally Posted by RickO:
Originally Posted by PJB:


In terms of sounds:
  • Both have a quillable whistle,  In terms of the whistle sound itself, this is probably a matter of preference so I won't comment Other than to say neither offers a smooth up/down the scale sound.

Winner: not sure there is a clear cut winner, but I prefer Legacy.

 I sense a bit of bias here.

 

 ..... is the bell tone a matter of preference too? Sounds are certainly more accurate/ better executed.... on one of the models.....depending on your "preference".

 

 

 

Actually, I sense a bit of taking something out of context to make your own point.  If you had quoted the entire "sounds comment," it would have included  

 

"Engine random sounds - Legacy has a bunch of creaking and groaning sounds that give this thing a real feel.  I don't know that MTH has much of this, although it does automatically launch a clickety-clack sound when the locomotive stays at a constant speed over 30 SMPH."  

 

This feature in particular is the reason I said I prefer the Legacy version. I had no idea what the real locomotive's bell or whistle sounded like and frankly, didn't care. 

 

Second point - when I said I prefer, it should have been a tip-off that I was stating my opinion.  Opinions, for the record, are always subjective and, therefore, biased. 

 

Third point - really like how you have the Premier, Legacy and real engines clips here for a sound comparison of the bell and whistle.  Thanks for adding this, it certainly helps. 

 

Peter

Last edited by PJB
Originally Posted by N&W Class J:

Actually in this case I have to give the nod to Lionel for the sounds...they nailed the whistle.  But for looks I'd go with MTH....Lionel had some issues with the 2 in 612 I see.

Based upon experience with other Railsounds sound sets, I would have agreed. However, based upon the MTH 2015 catalog information for the Premier 611,

 

“These models will feature a new sound set recorded from prototype J No. 611, currently under restoration and scheduled to hit the road in early 2015. Current owners of Proto-sound 2.0 or 3.0 Class Js can download the new sound set for free after it’s released. Watch the progress of 611’s restoration and make a contribution at fireup611.org.”

 

Hopefully MTH won't disappoint. For my train dollars, what can be more accurate than a sound set from "the real deal"?

 

Gilly

UPDATE ON WARRANTY REPAIR

 

Kudos to Lionel service!   You may recall that the day after I got this set and did the review it started running in a very jerky manner, the smoke unit failed and the cab interior light began flickering like a disco and would not stop regardless of whether the train was stopped or in motion.  Disappointed, to say the least. But Lionel paid for shipping both ways. And I got the locomotive back fixed within a week!  Compare that to the two brand new MTH Imperial ES44s I sent to MTH for repairs 6 weeks ago. Still in queue and Service said "maye in two weeks."  Not complaining, as this is what I've come to expect from MTH, but this is my first experience with a warranty fix from Lionel and, while returning a brand new locomotive for repairs is not fun, I am totally impressed by how quickly they got it done!  

 

Peter

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×