Skip to main content

In case you missed this story and photo gallery in the New York Times.  Both Lionel Portercraft and A.C. Gilbert chemistry sets are mentioned in the story and photo gallery.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...ot-exploding.html?hp

 

https://www.nytimes.com/slides...oys.html?ref=science

 

 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Pat Shediack:

In case you missed this story and photo gallery in the New York Times.  Both Lionel Portercraft and A.C. Gilbert chemistry sets are mentioned in the story and photo gallery.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...ot-exploding.html?hp

 

https://www.nytimes.com/slides...oys.html?ref=science

 

 

 

 

My Aunt bought me a chemistry set in 1953 and it sparked a lifelong career in chemistry.

 

          --Bob Di Stefano

My career was in the computer field, but I still remember with fondness the Gilbert chemistry set I got for my (eighth) birthday in 1956.  I learned that copper sulfate crystals are a beautiful blue and paper soaked in cobalt chloride will turn pink in damp weather.  Life's great lessons are found in the most unexpected places.

I fondly remember my and my friends' Gilbert chemistry sets. We would supplement chemicals in our sets from a chemical supply house in Manhattan (Winn??) Knew my periodic chart and the common valences before taking general chemistry at Brooklyn Tech (Class of January, 1960).  

 

When I took qual and quant courses, I purchased my KMnO4 titrating solutions from Fisher in Manhattan. I desired precision titrations, so I wanted the correct normal solution for my lab work!

I never received a chemistry set marketed by either Gilbert or Porter.  I grew up in northeast Philly in the late 1940s to the late 1950s and I badgered my mother to death because I wanted a chemistry set so badly.  Then fate intervened; in the space of about one month two of my schoolmates were badly burned, one terribly disfigured, by exploding chemicals from their sets.  That ended the debate.  I did eventually receive a Gilbert Microscope and later a more powerful Porter microscope.  Those microscopes got a lot of use and I enjoyed them thoroughly.  I got a real kick out of hatching shrimp eggs and watching the little babies swim around under the microscope.  It was great fun but I never parlayed into a career in science.  Like Putnam Division I wish I still had them.

I was always trying and failing to make rocket fuel, or something equally explosive with mine (Gilbert). Closest I could get was a mixture with sulfur and god knows what else I threw in there. The mixture, when heated with a candle, bubbled and burbled but nothing ever really happened. Being 11 or 12 years old, I had no idea what I was doing but I had the sense not to add anything that wasn't from the set, like gas for the lawnmower or Draino, and my parents assumed there was no possible way I could actually blow anything up. It was fun trying though. To this day I still don't know if there was any combination of supplied chemicals that would have been dangerous.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×