Skip to main content

I will let the NS experts be the judge. The new 2013 Lionel legacy NS dash-9 on the left. Compare this with the earlier legacy NS dash-9 from the tank train set on the right. How did Lionel miss this on the new model that they did correct the first time around on the tank train version? 

Last edited by FMC
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Sorry but details, details and details are so overlooked its pathetic. The headlight in the wrong location is a huge blunder no matter if you're 3-rail or 2-rail. I mean seriously that is a Norfolk Southern option that must be done.  Toys or not that is awful.  Sorry. Why can't Lionel get that right. MTH was hit and miss but did get the latest offering correct.  You decide but excuses don't cut it.  

Originally Posted by Sullyman626:

4 or 6 Wheel trucks do not make the difference between a Dash 8 or Dash 9, the Dash 8 was made as a Dash 840B (4 axle) or Dash 840C ( 6 axle), and yes the headlight is up high on NS GE power. Also the crew chatter doesn't include the crew whining, which is typical on NS power

I understand that. I am simply stating what Lionel does. Have you ever seen their Dash-840BW's? It's the same exact engine shell. Yes the Dash-8's came in both 4 axle and 6 axle configurations. Not sure off hand if the Dash-9 was available in a 4 axle version. I have only seen them as 6 axles. But for some reason Lionel chose to take the same shell with details of both the 8's and the 9's, and depending how many axle's the chassis has is the determining fact they will call it an 8 or a 9. I think the last time they made 8's was a few years ago with Amtrak and BNSF.

 

Bill 

Originally Posted by Jeff78rr:

Sorry but details, details and details are so overlooked its pathetic. The headlight in the wrong location is a huge blunder no matter if you're 3-rail or 2-rail. I mean seriously that is a Norfolk Southern option that must be done.  Toys or not that is awful.  Sorry. Why can't Lionel get that right. MTH was hit and miss but did get the latest offering correct.  You decide but excuses don't cut it.  

The GE dash 9 BNSF, CNW, CSX, and CN had the headlight low...so one shell for the dash 9?

More low than high? Not a blunder, but cost?

On the left is the recent new Legacy Norfolk Southern Dash-9 #9322 from the 2013 catalog. The headlight position is incorrect for NS. On the right is the Legacy Norfolk Southern Dash-9 #9798 from the NS tank train set offered in 2008/2009. The headlight position is correct. This clearly shows that Lionel has the correct tooling for the NS version.  Both engines are identical in size and dimensions except for the two different headlight configurations on the cab. Either it is mistake that was overlooked or it was a cost cutting measure to go with only using one shell for all the road names offered. Either way it is not right and it should be corrected. I am sure I am not going to be the only one who has ordered or purchased the new 2013 NS version and is going to have the same beef.

Martin: if you are thinking of getting the BNSF version then get it. The headlight is correct for BNSF. Overall it is a good model. It runs good looks good and sounds great. In fact the sound is very loud.Originally Posted by Martin H:

Man, I feel for ya.  I was kicking around the idea of getting the BNSF version of this, but was too fearful that it wouldn't be a good model.   For $450 of your money, you should expect that Lionel would not screw up a detail like that, especially since they have released the correct version in the past!

 

I wanted to get a Dash-9 in the H1 scheme, like we are talking about.  MTH released it last year, but it was with the same BNSF dash 9 tooling from 10 years ago.  Therefore, it was lacking in the detail that MTH BNSF models have for the past seven years or so.  So I passed on it.  Then I saw this Lionel announcement, and I thought, maybe this will be more detailed than the MTH.
 
Is it more detailed than the BNSF Dash-9 MTH released recently in H1?  
 
if it is, then I am going to get it.  I love good sound too!
 
Originally Posted by FMC:
Martin: if you are thinking of getting the BNSF version then get it. The headlight is correct for BNSF. Overall it is a good model. It runs good looks good and sounds great. In fact the sound is very loud.Originally Posted by Martin H:
 
Originally Posted by Martin H:
I wanted to get a Dash-9 in the H1 scheme, like we are talking about.  MTH released it last year, but it was with the same BNSF dash 9 tooling from 10 years ago.  Therefore, it was lacking in the detail that MTH BNSF models have for the past seven years or so.  So I passed on it.  Then I saw this Lionel announcement, and I thought, maybe this will be more detailed than the MTH.
 
Is it more detailed than the BNSF Dash-9 MTH released recently in H1?  
 
if it is, then I am going to get it.  I love good sound too!
 
Originally Posted by FMC:
Martin: if you are thinking of getting the BNSF version then get it. The headlight is correct for BNSF. Overall it is a good model. It runs good looks good and sounds great. In fact the sound is very loud.Originally Posted by Martin H:
 

Martin, MTH reworked that tooling to make it more accurate. I understand that BNSF has what is called a "Gullwing" cab. It is to clear the coal loading chutes at a mine or mines in Texas. Neither MTH nor Lionel has simulated that on the BNSF's. Overall though MTH's model is more correct. BTW I have the H1 Dash-9's from MTH. Beautiful engines. I don't know if on the NS Dash-9's that this was the case, but I understand inserts can be used on the tooling. I don't know if they used them or if they had separate tooling for the cab itself for the one that came with the Tanktrain set. However as long as they use the current tooling this engine will never ever be an accurate representation for a Dash-8 or 9 on any rr, anywhere. 

 

Bill

Originally Posted by NSBill:

Martin, MTH reworked that tooling to make it more accurate. I understand that BNSF has what is called a "Gullwing" cab. It is to clear the coal loading chutes at a mine or mines in Texas.

 

Bill

I doubt that there are any "coal mines in Texas", however the power plants that receive the BNSF coal trains from Wyoming's Powder River Basin (where the mines are located), are indeed located in the Houston, Texas area.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by NSBill:

Martin, MTH reworked that tooling to make it more accurate. I understand that BNSF has what is called a "Gullwing" cab. It is to clear the coal loading chutes at a mine or mines in Texas.

 

Bill

I doubt that there are any "coal mines in Texas", however the power plants that receive the BNSF coal trains from Wyoming's Powder River Basin (where the mines are located), are indeed located in the Houston, Texas area.

My mistake on that one. Don't know what I was thinking there. I remember reading somewhere that their cabs are modified specifically for clearances there in Texas at certain unit train loading/unloading points. I forget now what it is.

 

Bill

Here you are, Martin:

IMG_1815
IMG_1723

Santa Fe ordered the Dash 8-40CWs with the "gull wing" cab because of tight clearances in the York Canyon coal mine facilities in New Mexico. That cab also appeared on later ATSF GEs, including a later order of Santa Fe Dash 8-40BWs and  on Dash 9-44CWs. After the BN/ATSF merger, BNSF ordered all of its Dash 9s and AC4400s with the gull wing roof line. It seems to have been discontinued with the ES44 series.

 

RM

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_1815
  • IMG_1723

I received my Dash-9 today, and it is beautiful. The detail is great, the paintwork looks beautiful, it runs and smokes brilliantly, and it sounds fantastic. The headlight may not be in the expected position, but that doesn't bother me at all. Who's to say that it didn't get moved for some reason in service?

I am 100% happy with mine. The picture in the catalogue does not do it justice at all. 

Originally Posted by N.Q.D.Y.:

The headlight may not be in the expected position...

 

Who's to say that it didn't get moved for some reason in service?. 

If there's photographic or other factual evidence to support that it's been moved then you definitely would have a valid point.

 

The Lionel model still looks to be the same overall Dash 9 as they have had for over a decade.  Looks like they have made minor revisions to be able to change the MARS and ditch light configurations over the past few years (sometimes incorrectly as evidenced in this thread)  but the body shell is still not a true Dash 9 as it still retains some carryover Dash 8 details on it.  The elongated vent screen on the upper part of the long hood on behind the engineer's side of the cab is the single biggest giveaway.

 

MTH, from 2000 onward, has always had the most accurate Dash 9 plastic body shell.  I seem to recall that GE even gave them access to the blueprints for the prototype when they designed the new tooling being used today in the late 1990s.  Up until around the mid-2000s however MTH still retained the rather toyish and shortened representations of the GE Hi-adhesion trucks that are identical to the ones Lionel still uses that did detract from the appearance of the MTH models, at least until they redesigned the trucks and now they are truly excellent.  Probably the best overall looking model of the Dash 9 that was offered in 3-rail is probably the brass one from Sunset/3rd Rail, but the latest MTH model is a very close second.

Last edited by John Korling
Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×