Skip to main content

I thought this deserved its own thread.  There has been much talk about how the touchscreen interface is inferior for running trains.  I totally agree.  I actually think the the touchscreen is inferior in many applications because your eyes have to be on the controller in order to perform any action.  It has no business being in a car dashboard, for example.

 

But there are add-ons to a tablet or smartphone that provide buttons, knobs, sliders, etc and sends those actions to the device.

 

Using something like this, operators could have the freedom to snap something like this onto their device and use the tactile control.  Or leave it off and just use the touchscreen.  Bam, everyone is happy.  I really hope the train makers are considering this.

 

Here is an article and video showing it:

 

http://www.wired.com/2014/10/s...-physical-interface/

 

 

 

Here is an example of a typewriter for the ipad:

 

Last edited by towdog
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by rtr12:

That was really neat. Probably good for a lot of things, but if you have to add all the buttons and knobs back on the ipads, why not just use the DCS or Legacy remote? Seems like it just turns the touch pad back into the remote which we already have?

 

For all the ideas people are tossing around.  Watching the Wifi control Bachmann is producing, speculating on the day when manufacturers do away with proprietary control systems and go to a universal standard.  Maybe Lionel and MTH could get together and create the actual software together, but then make their own physical iPad accessory to plug into it that would mimic their own remotes so people would be familiar with it.  Have MTH trains, snap the MTH unit onto your iPad?  For Lionel, snap on the Lionel unit.

 

This would be a way to make everyone happy.  If you want physical buttons you can still have them.  If you are fine with the touchscreen, that's possible too.

Folks involved in robotics have been using playstation 3 controllers, via Bluetooth, for controlling their robots.
Same could be done for trains.

But then why go through all that trouble when good functioning TMCC, Legacy, and DCS remotes already exist.

Technology already exists where a small computer containing a processor, RAM, software, speaker, and wifi can all fit inside an o gauge locomotive. These small computers can be programmed to control movement, lights and sounds. Multiple small computers can automatically form self meshing wifi networks and share information with each other via sensors. These things can be controlled by any type of user interface you like. They can even be programmed to operate autonomously.
The people involved in robotics are driving this technology. It can be adapted to trains but no one base done it yet.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×