For over twenty years, I have operated my layout, configured with TMCC five Powermasters, connected to five blocks and controlled thirty two switches using ASC control boxes (14182) all with CAB1s. Operation, either via command or conventional control, has been flawless. I decided to upgrade to Legacy. I bought the Legacy Base and CAB 2 (990) , Powermaster Bridge and additional CAB 1L. The "Y" cable , connecting the Bridge to the Legacy Base, as shown in the instructions, is about three feet long, not the seven feet as was recommended by Mike Reagan. The TMCC Command Base has been disconnected from the track and the ground wire from it has been connected to the Legacy Base. There is no place to connect the switch cable (14191) to the Legacy system, so it remains connected to the TMCC base, in order to control switches. Operationally, I am able to run conventional, TMCC and Legacy engines, using the 1L and CAB 2, I must use the CAB 1 to throw switches and I am able to run engines conventionally with the CAB 1, as well. Throwing switches, via the 1L is sporadic and doesn't happen with the CAB 2. Having to use two handhelds is a step down from the old TMCC set up. TWO QUESTIONS: BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUENESS OF THE "Y" CABLE, HOW DO I WIDEN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE POWERMASTER BRIDGE AND THE LEGACY BASE? SECONDLY, IS THERE A WAY TO CONNECT THE ASC CABLE TO THE LEGACY SYSTEM, SO THAT I WILL BE ABLE TO OPERATE THE LAYOUT WITH ONE HAND HELD RATHER THAN 2? ONE FINAL QUESTION: DID I MAKE A MISTAKE GOING FULL BLOWN LEGACY OR SHOULD I HAVE SIMPLY PURCHASED THE 1L BASE AND FIVE LEGACY POWERMASTERS AND CAB 1LS? THE ASC CABLE COULD BE CONNECTED TO THE BASE 1L. Your thoughts, please.