Skip to main content

Or 060 Fastrack?

 

What I mean is this--I'm always seeing posts talking about running "almost anything" on 072 curves, but the bottom line is that many of us just don't have the space to squeeze that size curve into a layout.

 

It seems to me that quite a bit SHOULD run well on 054 or 060 curves, and for someone like me who likes scale sized equipment 054 should allow fixed pilots on 4-axle diesels, 40 and 50' freight cars, and most non-articulated steam locomotives.

 

The difference between 072 and 054 curves on a small layout can be the difference between a track plan that has scenic and operating potential and one that sits unused because there isn't anything to hold interest.

 

What's your opinion? 

 

Jeff C

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I ran O-54 in the basement at the old house and Had plenty of equipment.

In general, smaller and older design equipment will run on smaller curves even if they are scale units. Things like articulated Steamers will need a lot bigger curves for Scale items but those are also available in non scale versions.

I have a Big Boy that will run around an O-31 loop but it looks awful doing so.

I also have a Scale one that looks odd on O-72 so pick your poison.

 

Check the catalog for anything you see and like, they list the Min track each item will run on.  Numerous threads have come and gone about specific engines and track smaller than listed for them. Some work a bit smaller and some don't.

Why would you go smaller? Some makers track is slightly off from others.

Not all O-72 is the same radius. Some measure inside rail, some outside, and some center rail. This means there can be a 2" difference in track loop to track loop of the same rating.

I have an O54 layout.  A Weaver Pennsy M1a will operate at restricted speeds.   Three axle truck diesels have difficulty through some of the O54 switches.  Track/Switches  are Atlas. There is an inner loop, Atlas O45 that is restricted to small units/locomotives.
What works best is smaller engine/locomotives, even in combination.

Last edited by Mike CT

Jeff:  I think that you're generally right about running most things on 0-54 curves.  On my layout, I have some curves that are only about 60" across and I still operate 21" passenger cars around them.  These exceedingly tight curves are hidden so you don't get the offending look of excessive overhangs when observing the train.  I don't have any articulateds but I do have several 4-8-4's and a couple of rather long 4-6-4's and they have no trouble negotiating 60" curves, and probably would handle curves as tight as 0-54.

 

One of the problems with running large engines, or long cars for that matter, around tight curves is that factor of overhang.  I recall hearing of one wag who bought a Big Boy, planning on running it on his 0-72 curves.  First time it ran on the layout, the boiler front rammed right into a tunnel portal.  No problem with that with other engines but that clearance factor can determine just what you can run.

 

So, in consideration of engine vs. curve diameter, in addition to the engine being physically able to negotiate the curve, you have to consider appearance and also clearance alongside the track.

 

Paul Fischer

 

With engines and rolling stock there are far more choices to run of 0-54 or less. When the manufacturer recommends a minimum curve I would stay away from the larger scale rolling stock. Example, the new auto racks from Lionel say 0-54 minimum curve but you have to consider the overhang on the curve. I run mine on 0-89 and 0-96 curves I still have a bit of overhang. Unless you are going to go to larger curves which takes away real estate for other things. You have the right idea.......Paul

Straight-up guidelines. "Traditional", LionMaster, or RailKing  and you should have no problems. You should be able to run bigger stuff up to 4-8-4 steamers. FWIW, just because an item is listed as "054 minimum", that doesn't mean that it's going to look good. Run the largest size curve you can accommodate.  

I used 0138 curves on my attic layout. All of my engines and rolling stock just look more realistic.

 Just my $0.02

 Gilly

Last edited by Gilly@N&W

Great responses, everyone.

 

Paul made a great point--just because 054 curves are used on a layout doesn't mean that they must be used everywhere, and in fact that large cosmetic curve on a prime viewing location on a smaller layout may only be possible because of compromising on curve radius somewhere else.

 

Jeff C

A lot of scale steamers are factory rated for 054 curves, including many if not most scale Northerns and Berkshires. Many 2-6-6-2 and 4-6-6-4 engines will also operate on 054. I have a real nice Lionel 2-6-6-2 that says 054 on the box, and looks plenty massive on the layout. You can pretty much forget scale Big Boys, Cab Forwards, and the 4-12-2, though. The Lionmaster Big Boy and Cab Forward will run fine all the way down to 042 and maybe smaller. They aren't scale, but they are big enough that they don't look badly out of proportion with scale rolling stock, especially since you would be operating them with period 40-50 foot cars rather than the much larger modern ones. 

 

Brass engines tend to require larger curves, and older ones more so than newer. I've been working on a friend's brass Williams J-class, and I don't think it would be happy on 054. The Williams Dreyfuss Hudson is similar - it says 072 on the box and it would have clearance issues on the leading and trailing trucks on 054. 

I have run the following locomotives around O-60 Fastrack without any issues.  One caveat is that I have not done any landscaping/ scenic work, and so I did not have any issues with running into obstructions.

 

JLC PRR GG-1 (though rated for O-72, it ran on O-60 with no issues at all, though I did keep the speed restricted)

JLC N&W Y6b (also rated for O-72, but would run on O-60, with restricted speeds)

 

Everything else I have owned has been rated for O-60 and smaller (i.e., Berkshire's, Mohawk's, Hudson's, Mallet's, Northern's, Diesel's, Switcher's, and so on).

 

I have mixed O-72 & O-60 on the same curve just to make the trackage fit within a certain restricted space.  I have also used O-36 half curves coming off switches, however, the bigger steamers (O-54/O-60 rated) definitely did not like the tight curves, and would jump easily.

 

Hope this helps a bit.

The really big steam and some of the big turbines will definitely bind, stutter, stall or jump the track on anything less that 0-72; however I have successfully tricked a few, to run on an eased 0-54. In other words, lead and out of an 0-54 curve with an 0-72. This will work for a lot of engines with blind drivers, but anything that's fully flanged (including some larger tenders) will not be happy.

BTW, this will work for some of the more stubborn locos that are finicky on 0-72 loops. Just ease in and out of the loop with 0-84 (Fastrack only, I haven't tried other brands).

 

r0d

 

Last edited by rOdnEy
Originally Posted by Erik C Lindgren:
This train is running on a 54" radius. As you can see it is fine-scale

Most of my equipment will not run on this layout. My articulated's jam after the transition.
image

We're in 3R land right now, Eric, so 054 equals a 27" radius curve, quite a bit tighter than the curve in the picture.

 

Oddly enough, most big Sunset 2R steam wouldn't run on the curve in your picture, but most 3R guys and gals would do hand stands if they had that sort of space to work with...

 

Jeff C

Sorry Jeff!

Nad nabbit. It's all good the 3 rail too. I have plenty for Pete's sake!

Erik

Originally Posted by leikec:

       
Originally Posted by Erik C Lindgren:
This train is running on a 54" radius. As you can see it is fine-scale

Most of my equipment will not run on this layout. My articulated's jam after the transition.
image

We're in 3R land right now, Eric, so 054 equals a 27" radius curve, quite a bit tighter than the curve in the picture.

 

Oddly enough, most big Sunset 2R steam wouldn't run on the curve in your picture, but most 3R guys and gals would do hand stands if they had that sort of space to work with...

 

Jeff C

No surprise there, that's a semi-scale engine built for 031 curves. I used to run mine on 031 tubular under the Christmas tree. The Premier version of the same engine is scale and rated by MTH for 054 curves. 
 
Originally Posted by Matthew B.:

My RailKing Imperial, Hiawatha F7 runs fine on O54 and I don't remember making any special allowances for the tunnel portals.

 

Gilly is right about the bottom line. "Traditional", LionMaster, or RailKing are all going to have no issues on O-54.

Scale stuff as you see can run on it, as long as you avoid the largest ones and are willing to accept the overhang, both inside and outside the curves.

And Yes, Easement is an excellent way to get them down to the minimum curve.

I use them on anything less than O-72 Curves and like to do it even on those.

Flex track is a godsend in these cases but depending on brand can be difficult to work with.

I'm using MTH Scaletrax and compared with others it's a limp noodle. I can easily do a 180° u turn with a single 30" piece. And get this! I can straighten that piece back out and use it as a straight ! with nothing but my hands working the track !

 

Now ,one other thing I noted in reading down; Tunnel entry is a problem on curves, the tighter the curve, the more width you need.

Optimally you go in and out of tunnels straight for at least the section through the portal. This means with My Imperial Railking Big Boy I can do O-31 inside the tunnel but I need to run at least 20 inches of straight through the portal. Otherwise I end up needing a much wider portal. Ya, the big boy will turn tight but it gets WIDE. On O-31 the Cab overhang is 4 inches outside the outer rail...

Last edited by Russell

A couple of Nice choices in Scale Locomotives that will run on O-54 are Lionel's Southern Pacific GS-4's, and 3rd Rails BEAUTIFUL Southern Pacific AM-2 Cab-Forward(I wish that I had picked up one of those when they came out) The AM-2 was a 4-6-6-2, rather than the latter 4-8-8-2. So with the AM-2, it is possibly to get a SCALE Cab-Forward that the MFR rates at O-54.

The Lionel FEF-3 was rated both ways by Lionel O-54 and O72, depending on what source you were reading, the box, or the catalog. With the FEF-3 it depended on the type of track you were using, I had built a Christmas Tree platform with MTH Realtrax that had O-54 on the outside loop SPECIFICALLY for the FEF-3's. The locomotive itself ran fine on O-54, it was the tender, that didn't like the O-54, and the last axle of the pedestal tender would ride over the outside rail, about 1 inch after fully entering the curve. Another forum member, Laz 1957, had no trouble running his FEF-3's on O-54, but he was using tubular track. Lionel had included a couple of blind wheel sets for the tender on some of the early scale Big Boys, but unfortunately did not with the FEF-3's, with a blind axle or two, an FEF-3 should make O-54 without any trouble. Another idea would be, Atlas O offers O-63 curves, if that would be a workable compromise between O-54 and O-72, you would have many choices that would run better than on O-54.

There are some Very Nice Scale choices that will run on O-54, but it does take a bit of research,  

Doug

FWIW - 072 is a 36" radius, 060 ->30" radius, 054 ->27" radius, 042->21" radius, 031 ->15.5" radius.  And, yes, 027 is 12.5" radius.

A 72" radius would be a 144 - essentially a 12 foot diameter.  A person could run full scale everything on 144.

Now for the fun: Some manufacturers measure radius to the CENTER rail and some to the OUTER  or INNER rail.  I remember inadvertently mixing K-Line with Lionel tubular curves and couldn't figure out why the straights on an oval didn't line up.  Once I isolated the issue to the BRAND of track I got it to work.

I bring this up only because reading this thread I saw references which seemed to mix these up.

Fred

Depending on how picky you are when you say "scale" (not uber picky it would appear if you use a 3rd rail like us), you could go down to the semi scale level and use 042 curves with 4 axle road diesels (Lionel diesels from the 1940's to the 1970's, Although not scale detailed, were scale sized) and corresponding 40' and 50' cars (again, traditional rolling stock was not quite scale detailed, but much was scale sized).

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×