Originally Posted by Steve "Papa" Eastman:
It's not just the Tinplate Times. I am the new editor for our club news letter and other than the normal monthly presidents message, and a few regular club status pieces, almost no one contributes. Same for the TTOS Bulletin. They all need articles. For our club, I have a total of one article in the file for future use. Come on guys, help your clubs etc.
Steve
Theres another aspect to the issue you raised on reader generated content in a magazine format as well as on the internet.I imagine that at times, this is a challenge for any editor, who, in effect, is organizing the material submitted by readers, as a conduit for other readers.I think model railroading is fairly unique in this.
Take away product reviews, editorials, tips and you have history on one hand and layouts on the other.
Having said that, tinplate in relation to it's history and those who have knowledge of it... is a comparatively very small pond, and access to reference materials is even smaller.How many people are similar to Greenburg? I have written published essays in magazines and in literary anthologies on another subject. Here's the problem..I don't have anything unique to contribute on this one. I respectfully submit that it is not just a matter of sloth.
Then you have layouts, and my suspicion is that there are far fewer tinplate layouts than other types.If this were not constricting enough the layouts that are passed along to readers are usually worthy of note. IE: You don't see articles about layouts on a ping pong table and I suspect this is the case more so with tinplate layouts. Then there is the "my layout is not good enough" reaction in readers when they compare whats published in relation to their own. I certain Allan could address this far better than I can.
So, these factors could be included in your dilemma as well as in Jims. I could send material on my own but..my layout is a hybrid of the trains being tinplate and the environment being hi-rail ( so I can run tinplate as well as other types). How many folks can relate to that, or, for that matter have done the same thing so it would be of interest? The concept came from Thor who called this "tinscale"
Heres the thing I find interesting..on this type of magazine (here) or at others and that are "photofun " threads. I tried to start one here and it pooped out, but none the less,I see "ping pong types" generated as much enthusiasm in comments as the most elaborate ones.
I think it's a very unique can of worms when you get into it.
One last factor..collections. I always look forward to seeing samples from yours, which seems comparatively extensive. Mine is smaller due to having other interests
and involvements such as railroad preservation.It seems a safe bet most collections are smaller than yours and have fewer unique items worthy of note.