Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The only vehicles on my layout without drivers will be parked ones.

It's very hard to see, but both of these have drivers.

But even then, they'll be pulled over on the side of a road or waiting at a stop sign. Anything on my layout that won't ever be moving must be in a static pose or situation. No figures will be walking or running, all the 'people' will be standing or sitting. No cars stopped in the middle of the road. Besides, my roads won't be very long anyway as my layout takes place way up in the deep hills of East Tennessee during WW2 and there wouldn't be many cars around anyway in that time and place.

Driverless cars on my layout are standing out to me more and more. I have a bunch of Yat Ming '50's convertibles I picked up at Wally World years ago. The lack of drivers is beginning to bug me, as well as a lack of people in general.

 

I used to get sets of unpainted seated people at a nearby hobby shop. They had extra heads and the arms were not attached so they could be posed. My supply is running low (used them in On30 projects years ago) and I can't seem to find them anymore. Not even sure who made them. Seems like the word "circus" was in the name on the label.

I agree - car looks silly without a driver if it supposed to be moving.  

 

I put a driver in all the 'Streets conversion when that I can - they are moving so of course they need a driver, and in all diecast models unless they are representing "parked cars" on the layout.

In all cases but the Divco truck (my driver drive than one standing, as really was the case with them) I used a normal 1:48 figure (Model Power) cut off at the waist and glued to the seat: you can't tell they have no legs. On convertibles I use smaller seated figures as for passenger cars.  It takes almost no time and makes a big difference. 

 

DSCN8311

DSCN8307

DSCN8309

DSCN8313

Attachments

Images (4)
  • DSCN8311
  • DSCN8307
  • DSCN8309
  • DSCN8313

You are absolutely right that once you think about it then it starts to bug you.  Another thing is that I usually don't notice the lack of driver in person, but I sure do in pictures.  Same with many of my scenes that you pretty good to me until I see the pictures and then all the little things really stand out.

 

Art

Originally Posted by Chugman:

You are absolutely right that once you think about it then it starts to bug you.  Another thing is that I usually don't notice the lack of driver in person, but I sure do in pictures.  Same with many of my scenes that you pretty good to me until I see the pictures and then all the little things really stand out.

The famous modeler John Allen (of Gorre & Daphetid RR fame) routinely took photos of model work as a tool to tell what looked right. He once pointed out a large out-of-scale screw on another guy's locomotive that nobody noticed in person but was obvious in a pic.

I've seen several layouts that look great in person but seem kind of 'bleh' in photos. And yes, details like driverless cars are easy to miss in person.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×