OTOH, in l-o-n-g run, we want those folks to stay in business for the betterment of the hobby and our market.
Ergo, there probably are other reasons for their not coming...besides the perception of being punitive to the individual After all, as much as they've cultivated personal relationships among the York attendees through the 'good' years, and I'm sure they'd like to talk trains, pains, .and...for the Fred/Henri crowd...rains, the business considerations can outweigh the emotions.
It's expensive. Costs of distance are variable, of course, but hardly insignificant. Then there are the hotels, meals, fees, etc., etc., all of which go on the expenses side of the business ledger. Items such as lingering health concerns for attending representatives is not typically a ledger item, but it carries a lot of weight in these times.
And the offsetting payoff for this one show for those who've chosen to pass? Measurable? Hardly a blip on the positive side of the ledger for some, inadequate for others.
Being a business on which others rely, its success MUST consider the business perspective. They're not non-profit. They're not inherently, necessarily altruistic. If they thought their absence from this particular show would destroy their market acceptance, they probably had a rather thin grasp on their business in the first place.
I, for one, am in this hobby 'til death do us part. I'm dismayed when a declining number of supporting companies hang it up...for even the best of reasons...like retirement after a long positive contribution. Moreso, however, I'm gratified to see sound business effort and direction being applied by our suppliers. I support their decision...period.
KD