Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Well, what changed? Those center beam cars have always made it up the Hill in the past. I wonder how much train they are hanging behind those flats? Is PSR perhaps doubling train tonnage? If so that would sure answer the question, wouldn't it?

What I don't get is why the faulty practice, whatever it is, wasn't changed after the last wreck.

In '67, '68, '69 at the time when those big auto-racks were coming into use the B&O had IIRC three or four wrecks on the Butler-Buffalo line (nee BR&P) pulling several empty auto racks off the inside of sharp curves. But there is no new equipment in use in these Pennsy wrecks.

Lew

I don't think the center beams were from a previous derailment, I watched the video of the train going by with the three center-beam cars right behind the engines.  Like I said, the second time for the same empty car type, time for someone to get their head out of the dark place!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsE9mOohSB8

Attachments

Images (2)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
gunrunnerjohn posted:

I don't think the center beams were from a previous derailment, I watched the video of the train going by with the three center-beam cars right behind the engines.  Like I said, the second time for the same empty car type, time for someone to get their head out of the dark place!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsE9mOohSB8

geysergazer posted:

Well, what changed? Those center beam cars have always made it up the Hill in the past. I wonder how much train they are hanging behind those flats? Is PSR perhaps doubling train tonnage? If so that would sure answer the question, wouldn't it?

 

It was a 107 car train, these should have been farther back I'd imagine.

 

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

My wife and I just moved to Altoona, to be better centralized near our mixed family of children and grandchildren, back in June. The train action here is a lot more then I anticipated. I sure will be spending more time at the curve once I finish moving our furniture and my layout. The video of the reaction of the few people there was great. A day they'll never forget. Not only is this place a train lovers paradise, but Blair county just did an equalization of all the properties for "up to date" assessment value. Then lowered the millage rates. So the taxes here are a third of what we were paying in Carbon county. Good reason to live here if you love trains and are on a fixed income.

gunrunnerjohn posted:
gunrunnerjohn posted:

I don't think the center beams were from a previous derailment, I watched the video of the train going by with the three center-beam cars right behind the engines.  Like I said, the second time for the same empty car type, time for someone to get their head of the dark place!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsE9mOohSB8

geysergazer posted:

Well, what changed? Those center beam cars have always made it up the Hill in the past. I wonder how much train they are hanging behind those flats? Is PSR perhaps doubling train tonnage? If so that would sure answer the question, wouldn't it?

 

It was a 107 car train, these should have been farther back I'd imagine.

 

Tnx! So train length not the issue, leaving the position of the spine cars in the train. You'd think in the age of computer controls a flag would appear if an improper consist is made up.

Lew

shurlock1 posted:

We are all in a RUSH, RUSH, RUSH world and people are going to make mistakes and people are going to get hurt. It's the business always looking for the extra buck. Company will always talk safety but their really talking a line of BS.

OK, I'll bite. How do you make the "extra buck" after paying the costs of cleaning up the wreck, causing delays to other trains and possibly paying out damage claims?

Looks more like negligence by those responsible for making up the train rather than some company policy to make a so-called "extra buck"

 

Maybe they are like other RR's and have eliminated many train make up rules because it takes too long for the yard jobs to build the trains properly according to those rules. Remote control jobs especially "simply do not have time to switch those cars out!"

As you see trains get bigger and bigger, expect to see it more often. 

Lehigh Valley Railroad posted:

CSX does actually have a rule about no empty centerbeams cannot be in the head 30 positions of a train if so many cars are behind. 

Aha!  There you have it.  

Maybe the crew picked up these cars at a blind siding and violated train make-up instructions, but I will put my money on some yard Official who authorized an exception to the rule, in order to get the train out of his yard.  As Laidoffsick pointed out, it is very time-consuming to switch a train into compliance using two Switchmen and remotely controlled equipment.  And . . . Precision Scheduled Railroading measures car velocity.

Q:  Where's all the legacy railroad knowledge?  A:  Retired, staying cool on hot days and warm on cold days.

Last edited by Number 90

Odd that 90 mentioned legacy railroading, and behold two things are on the net.

We are seeing two sequel shows:  STAR TREK: PICARD,  and TOP GUN: MAVERICK.  Is there now some sort of concern overall that we need to "go retro" to solve problems?

The car positioning here is a small issue.  Now, all the issues which caused the wreck of the Amtrak Cascade train looks like the rail version of the Max8.

We have gone from Apollo 13 to FAILURE IS THE ONLY OPTION.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×