Skip to main content

The atlas 89' flats seem to high off the rail to me, I don't have any problem getting them lower I just don't know what the prototypical deck height is from top of rail. I looked at the TTX sight but couldn't find what I needed. THe ACF sight didn't help either. Atlas two rail cars are same height as three rail.

 

Clem

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yes, they are a little too high, though probably not as much as some MTH and Atlas cars. My guess is they are about six scale inches too high. I suspect that if you lowered them just enough to match the car body up against the Kadee height gauge, you'd be close to the prototype height. And that's probably where you want to be as a practical matter in any event; any lower and your couplers will be off.

 

These TOFC cars don't ride as low as, for example, 89-foot tri-level autoracks. I think a partial reason for the extra ride height is to allow for the way Atlas mounts scale couplers on the two-rail versions (For those not familiar, the Atlas mounting plate is retained in the photo below). Remember also that the Atlas draft gear box top panel is a lot thicker than the Kadee draft gear box lid.

 

If you lower the body in accordance with the Kadee gauge, then you will have the problem of mounting couplers. If you keep Atlas two-rail mounting plate, your couplers would be too low (or at least out of the widely accepted scale standard). If you ditch that you'll have to drill into the body to mount scale couplers, and there's not much material in the deck to do that. I haven't tried it, but it seems to me that if I ever do lower these cars to that extent I likely would mark and drill and tap screw holes right through the body and the top deck (I would use 2mm screws). Then mount the couplers and cut the screws off flush with the deck. I doubt the fifth-wheel assembly will cover both scars in the deck, but a little putty, paint and weathering should do the job.

 

RM

 

Again, great job Clem

 

I think the thing that most limits the height of cars is the diameter of the 3-rail wheel flange.  The car has to clear that so there's no rubbing.

 

Next would be underframe detail.

 

It would be nice if they all used a standard bolster/mounting system for the trucks.

 

Does Athearn still make those trucks or are they leftover stock?

The Weaver plastic roller bearing trucks work well for this conversion also. I use the non-sprung trucks but they seem to work as good as the sprung Athearn and Weaver trucks. Here are a few pics of an 89' flat with the Weaver plastic roller bearing trucks.

The Weaver trucks have the same height at the truck bolster as the Athearns and the Weaver 3 rail wheelsets fit into them very easily.

 

 

 Weaver plastic non-sprung roller bearing truck

DSCN3106

Car lowered about 3/16 of an inch with Atlas truck bolster spaced between truck bolster and car bottom.

DSCN3103

Connected to diesel with correct coupler height.

DSCN3110

 

Travis

Attachments

Images (3)
  • DSCN3106
  • DSCN3103
  • DSCN3110

The reason that Weaver stopped offering those "plastic" trucks was due to all the complaints about the wheel sets in those trucks. The wheels are much thicker than the wheel sets in their die cast truck assemblies. The thicker wheel sets in the "plastic" trucks tend to short on some manufacturer switches, plus the gauging of the wheel sets was NOT always uniform.

 

Can't tell you how many Weaver "plastic" trucks I have thrown in the trash and replaced with their die cast trucks!

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×