Skip to main content

We are buying a new house in January.  It has a great train room below grade, and a kitchen and some other rooms that my wife is more interested in above that.  I have a specific prototype in mind (PRSL) and will be modeling the Ocean City (NJ) branch.  I have two options:

 

1)  The "basement buster" option, which would require a large junction and a double deck layout.  This would render the basement largely unusable for anything else, but would allow for more operating possibilities, or

 

2)  The "less is more" option, which would be an around the wall shelf layout (16 inches wide in most places) which would allow me to follow the prototype closely, I would just be modeling less of it, so there would be a little less in the way of operating possibilites.  The "middle" of the basement would still be usable space, and could support some furniture, tv, etc. What this one lacks in operational possibilities would be made up for with super detailing and prototypical accuracy. 

 

Based on much of the advice I have seen here, I am leaning toward the "less is more" option.  Thoughts please?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Pete:

 

This is a question only you can answer. I will add that many who took the "less is more" wish that in the long run they went the other direction. It seems that most of us want to grow our layouts, not shrink them as we add new equipment.

 

If your family is OK with you taking over the basement, then if I were in your shoes I would jump at the chance NOW to take advantage of this.

DMASSO, with those 2 cats that doesn't leave much room for anyone or anything else, does it?

 

Yeah, a bathroom would make it a complete man cave.  You wouldn't have to go upstairs for anything.  MAN!!! you got it made.

 

The main reason I moved to our new house, 23 years ago, was so I could put up the trains in the basement.  Soon as we moved in the wife started about what she was going to do to the basement.   Now all I have are some shelves under the garage area.  But some day I am going to squeeze a layout in somewhere.

 

Rick

basement busters are wonderful if you can devote the time and $$ to the effort.  I am amazed at some of the efforts member of this forum have put forth.  I on the other hand would either lose interest, stop devoting the time and $$ to the large effort or never complete the dream.  Less is more in my case

Very  subjective,

 

I purchased a long ranch to let lengthy passenger trains stretch their legs only to become dissilusioned when mocking up my first full length passenger train and front end cars along a 60'  wall.  The train shrank the room terribly! 

 

I switched to small powered peddler freights and still have a huge project ahead of me.  I vote smaller is better. 

 

Also, figure in your age,  cost, demise of physical ability,  and the inevitable.

 

You project, sounds very interesting.  More details?  What year modeled?   How many of the four rail lines serving OC will you be modeling?

 

Will you be doing either of the two OC traction lines?

 

Buzz did a real nice PRSL at the junction club several years ago.  See O Scale Trains article.

 

Do you need reference material? tt

Originally Posted by glockr:

If it was me, I'd start out with the "less is more" strategy. If you decide later that "more is more" you can always expand into the empty space in the middle of the basement.

 

Cheers,

Ken

Starting out around the walls with an option for a peninsula or three later seems like a good option.  That way, you can apply your lessons learned to the expansions.  More importantly, you'll be running trains sooner.


 

Thanks to all. Tom T, I'm looking at 1955 do that eliminates the traction and all but the remaining PRSL trackage, which is plenty to keep me busy. The real question is whether to model Tuckahoe too or just Peetersburg to the Gardens. I also think I have most of the available reference info and every piece of motive power and rolling stock I need. Now, of I could free up 40 hours a week to get moving

I agree with the "less is more" option at least to get going.  Have you ever built a large layout and saw it to completion?   If not the fantasy may be greater than the reality.  You can design it to enlarge it later if you still are that interested in the project.  When I see some of these 20x35 or larger layouts I realize I would never finish it even if I had the money.  You seem like you have a pretty good tight focus on the project so far just don't let your dreams carry you away.  

I believe the Gardens and the wye are a necessity plus the diamond off in the weeds at 11th st.

 

Both the town and the interurban trolleys were gone by '55.  Some of the town trolley routes were still visable in paired paths of asphalt patching.

 

It would be neat to do West Ave in smoked glass with the old buried tracks barely visable.  tt

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×