Skip to main content

Thinking of doing a two level urban layout with subways elevated on main level and strictly underground subway on lower level.  

Was also thinking of having the elevated line descend  to the underground level but concerned about the grade being too steep. 

Anyone know a good height from the ground to  the top of subway level and  from ground to the main level?

Any suggestions on how much clearance there should be between the underground subway level and the main level above it.  Would seven inches provide enough clearance? 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Random thots:

When ever working with various  levels for over / under operation I usually seek to achieve as much separation as practically possible.  The more separation the better the view IMO.  Your taste may vary.  You may not have the space to do that. 

For out of view minimum you may be able to get most equipment through 4 1/2".  7" is a for sure.  Get and use an NMRA gauge, that is a good middle of the road standard.

I like 10" of vertical railhead difference if the tracks are viewed close.  If the right of ways are far apart you can close that up.  Again, opinion.

While the trains all by themselves only need about 4 1/2" of clearance (assuming it's just passenger cars) the real answer to your question depends on a lot of decisions you first have to make; the kind of lumber you're going to use, the height of the track plus any roadbed on the lower level, how you're going to support the upper level, the thickness of the sub-roadbed on the upper level,  and where those supports are going to be located relative to the track on both levels.  7" sounds about right but depending on the factors above it could vary +- an inch. You didn't mention the size of the layout you're considering but to raise/lower the track 7" and be less than a 4% grade, which is kind of steep to begin with, you can do the math and see that you're going to need some room.

 

Last edited by Former Member

Subways don't need as much vertical clearance as regular trains. I use 8" from rail top to rail top for regular trains which includes 3/4" plywood and 3/4" for horizontal support. Just remember whatever you decide to go with you will need to be able to reach into and possibly rerail the cars, so leave room for your hand.

As for the grade issue, again you have an advantage with subways, since trains are short. With regular trains 2% is a good rule of thumb, but subways should easily handle double that. You might want to put some straight track on a board, and keep trying the train at steeper grades to find the max limit. Then lower that a bit to arrive at a final answer.

Last edited by Big_Boy_4005
yanksali posted:

Replying to xrayvizen

if there is el on main level about 7 inches high above main level going to down to a second level  which is 7 inches below wouldn’t  train being descending a total of  14 inches.

Yeah, I misread your original post. I read where you wrote it was two levels but realize, in re-reading, that it's actually three; The elevated section is going to be a real "El", I guess. Cool. Lots of opportunity for some city-scaping scenery. So yes, you will need about 15 feet of track to get from the "El" to street level, then another 15' down to the subway. Still doable for your planned 8x18. Just more track will be needed.

Pretty easy. Attached is a SCARM diagram showing 8x18 table with a 7" elevation change in 220-some inches...a 3% grade. (If you zoom in you can see the elevation notations marked on the track sections.)

I would suggest you make a diagram of your room and table, maybe sketch out some of your own ideas for a track plan and post in the Track Plans and Layout Design forum. There are lots of folks there who can help you design and fine tune your layout.

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • SCARM
Last edited by Former Member
yanksali posted:

To  xrayvizehn 

thank you - very  nice of you to take the time

much appreciated 

is scarm  a free or bought software. Where do I get it? Easy to use? 

on your diagram not clear which  is the elevated portion 

looks like a portion is like a yard that ends rather than connect to a portion of the loop 

 

SCARM is free to download and use up to a point (the number of track pieces.) Beyond that (I'm not sure what the number is, but it's a lot) there's a license fee. It's pretty easy/intuitive. Website. Also, on the track planning forum there's an ongoing thread all about SCARM.

To your second question, it doesn't matter. I was just demonstrating that you can get the clear elevation needed in a half a turn around an 8x18 layout. I could have continued the track on around clockwise and by the time the original  start point was reached (the switch) it could have been close to the 14" needed to get from subway to the main, and then main to the El. (or visa versa.)

Good luck.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×