Skip to main content

Closed7 replies

Conventional Remote?? for lack of a better name.

K.C JonesK.C JonesOGR Forum Member
Hello All…

After watching the Legacy Meeting “LUG” and hearing first hand where the O gauge hobby is headed I had to ask myself if that’s what I want.?? 
I love Remote Control Trains, and a slick Remote to control them. Another nice feature is a Remote Switch Control, although I enjoy throwing the switch that comes with the turnout…conventional control? 
The new sensor track sounds cool and I will enjoy all that it has to offer as long as it’s talking to my Legacy Remote. I don’ think I’ll ever use a computer/phone to interface with my Trains..,…not that there is anything wrong with that!
I have to admit it is exciting watching the Hobby Evolve. I guess I’m a Conventional Remote kind of guy. How about you ? Are you going to run out and buy an Apple- or maybe you already own one?  

Thanks for Reading..

K.C.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

BD Bob DelbridgeOGR Forum Member

When I got my Williams/Samhongsa brass USRA 2-8-2 and my Weaver brass G5 4-6-0 chassis (put a modified MTH 2-8-0 boiler on it) I pulled the conventional electronics out of them, keeping just the DC can motors so I could install PS2.

 

One day I hooked up my old Aristo-Craft Train Engineer (an HO set) with handheld remote to the inside & outside rails and ran the engines for quite a while.  I only ran one at a time, but it ran fine.

 

If one did not care about the sound it would be very easy to run 3-rail O scale using what's available when powering 2-rail.

 

I eventually installed PS2 in both engines, but if I ever have a failure I know I can gut them and continue running trains.

 

There's a couple of folks on the forum that do run using a simple DC setup, hopefully they'll chime in.

G GlennDegroatOGR Forum Member
K C Jones

I agree with you about conventional. I run legacy tmcc dcs and I always enjoy conventional as well. It's a nice feeling moving the lever on the transformer and slowly move the throttle and watch the train slowly move up to speed. Remotes are cool but they do not have the feel of a transformer throttle. Also using a phone or iPad even more defeats that feeling plus the iPad is way to big. I'm not knocking remote operations but each does have its plus and minuses.

Glenn
JS J ScottOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Dominic Mazoch:

I think Lionel could make a LionChief Transformer.  It could railse and lower voltage at the transformer itself.  Then any conventional train can have a "clicker".  And one does not have to go buy TMCC/L products to do it, kike I am now!


Isn't that what the remote for the MTH K-4000 does?

Views: 540
Post

Membership Required

We're sorry. You must be signed in to continue. Sign In or Register
×
Are you sure you want to remove from your Block List?
×
Loading...
×
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×

Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership

OGR Forum Supporting Membership

Help support this forum with an OGR Forum Supporting Membership.
You will be able to watch the videos in the INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO FORUM!
A one-year OGR Forum Supporting Membership is only $12 per year, so sign up now!


    OR     


Access the ALL the OGR VIDEO FORUMS AND  over 300 back issues of OGR
with a DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION!



$12.00 per 12 Months (plus tax if applicable)
×