Skip to main content

So I want to have my cake and eat it too, fixed pilot(s) and still relatively small(ish) turning radius.  I'm still very new to O scale and I've got a couple MTH SD70ACe's, one RailKing and one Premier.  However, I can't seem to get passed the moving pilots, it just doesn't look right.  It's really only the front one that you notice the most though.  So I was wondering, if I am going to always run a specific engine in the front, can I just fix the front pilot and add a Kadee and still be able to negotiate smaller (Atlas O 45 or maybe 54) turns?  It doesn't appear that a fixed pilot will interfere with the movement of the front trucks and (for now) I'll leave the back pilot and coupler alone.  Anything smaller than a o-45 doesn't look right anyway, IMHO. Has anyone ever tried this?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I've fixed the pilots on 10 of my MTH locos now, and can tell you they look better when you do these all the right way, which would be to do both front and back. It does not take that much longer to do both.

 

I will tell you this, though that you will need to use a bench grinder on the inside of these pilots to grind down the inner-most corners of the pilots just a bit so the truck scan swing the  full width. If you don't the leading edge of the truck sideframe will catch on that portion.

 

The SD70ACe's are easier to do- I just finished an AC4400, and there is alot more work to do on grinding away the inside portion of the pilots.

 

Take the time to do them right and you'll be happier all the way around- which inlcudes fabricating full-length handrails as well.  Just my opinion, but just do these the right way and you'll be pleased.

 

 

I haven't gone completely over to 2-rail, so at this point, I'm becoming hard-core 3rs. There was a thread on the 2-rail forum regarding curve requirements and I had posted which locomotives would negotiate 36" radius (O-72) with cars coupled. Cars coupled is the important factor. If you're going to go with fixed pilots, your best bet is to go with 36" (O-72) curves. Some of the smaller 4-axle units MAY make it through 31.5" Radius (O-63) but I haven't tested at that level, plus MTH rates them at 36" radius minimum anyway. Here's what worked so far:

 

SD70ACe (3 locomotives)

C44-9W (Dash 9) (2 locomotives)

C40-8/C40-8W (Dash 8's) (3 Wide cabs/1 conventional cab)

U25B (2 locomotives)

GP35 (3 locomotives)

GP38-2 (3 locomotives)

ATSF 4-6-4 Blue Goose Hudson

F7 ABBA (1 locomotive set)

ES44AC (2 locomotives)

 

All are equipped with Kadees. Initially, I expected problems with the short-shank couplers on the 6-axle power, but that turned out not to be a problem with the C44-9W's. The GP35's have an odd configuration related to the prototype's proportions and require an 806/743 short-shank coupler on the rear pilot, but had no problems on O-72.

 

It's a hard choice as you're considering leaving behind something you were very comfortable with. No, you won't be able to put as much track in a room and yes, there will be bumps in the road, but if you have the space to pull it off, go for it.

 

 

Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:

If you haven't invested in a Kadee 812 Height Gauge I would highly recommend it.

 

http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/page812.htm

I'll second that one. While you can use a "known good car" to check the height, I've found that some of the Kadees have trip pins that hang entirely too low. The height gauge lets you check the trip pins so they don't snag things.

 

BTW, Mike, great job on the P42 and the F40PH. I've been looking at converting my Metrolink cars and F59PHi over to Kadees.

Joe, I'll likely move the sideframes in after our show next weekend. Been doing a little more investigating, looks like I'll not only need to cut some of the bracket off the sideframe, drill and tap new holes, but also notch the modified bracket on 2 of them for a bulge on the side of the truck.
 
Originally Posted by Enginear-Joe:

 Moving in the side frames would be cool. I didn't even look at moving the step ladders and would say that would be a big step away from the regular 3 rail look.

 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×