Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Looking at a some older Model Railroader, 1942 thru 1959, it looks very similar in design to some of Scintilla's power supplies. The tags for A.C., and D.C. are identical as well as the binding posts. I saw nothing else in that time frame that looked exactly like it. Most all of the ones in the 50's had a lot of screen printing on the cases. Some of the Scintilla's were very plain, although none exactly like this one. Might have even been a home brew or a kit. Scintilla Rail and Power Works, Inc. New York, N.Y.

Originally Posted by eddie g:

Let me add, I doesn't look homemade to me. All the voltages work. I believe that it is a HO power supply for 2 trains. 2 of the toggle switches are on-off-on. So that would forward reverse the trains.

I thought prewar Gilbert HO locos used AC for power and DC impulse [ like Lionel whistle/horn ] for reversing ?

 

SZ [ NOT a Gilbert "expert"]

I vote for homemade. Nice execution but questionable design. The output terminals should be on the side not next to the controls and the use of a grommet rather than strain relief for the power cord doesn't pass muster for safety reasons.

Eddie, how about opening it up and check the wiring. That would be another clue.

 

Pete

Originally Posted by Steinzeit:
Originally Posted by eddie g:

Let me add, I doesn't look homemade to me. All the voltages work. I believe that it is a HO power supply for 2 trains. 2 of the toggle switches are on-off-on. So that would forward reverse the trains.

I thought prewar Gilbert HO locos used AC for power and DC impulse [ like Lionel whistle/horn ] for reversing ?

 

SZ [ NOT a Gilbert "expert"]

According to the 1939 AGC catalog, prewar Gilbert HO was AC.  I think reversing required interrupting the voltage.

 

I would also say this transformer is home made.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by Norton:

I vote for homemade. Nice execution but questionable design. The output terminals should be on the side not next to the controls and the use of a grommet rather than strain relief for the power cord doesn't pass muster for safety reasons.

Pete,

   Agreed, if you are using current [ pun intended ] standards -- but:

- I can find photos on the internet, even Ebay, of Scintilla units with the terminal and controls on the same face.

-  A grommet was pretty standard back then, or even into the fifties;  my Bergen Duo-pak has just such an arrangement.

 

I think it is either 'factory' or 'factory-but-modified' myself.

 

Best, SZ

Its possible it was assembled from a kit. Bud Boxes use phillips screws and they have been around for a long time. Project boxes used to be offered in krinkle paint or it could have used by the builder. I think I still have a few in black krinkle in our storeroom at work.

I am still thinking it was put together by a skilled amateur. The arrangement of the components doesn't lend itself to mass production.

based on the size of the transformer it would have been pretty powerful for HO.

 

Pete

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×