Skip to main content

One of the reasons I suggested the CF-7 as a possibility to a Bachmann salesman was because I hoped that if Bachmann Williams DID decide to produce a CF-7 in O three-rail, they could use the trucks and power assemblies from already-produced mechanisms.
 
Originally Posted by AGHRMatt:

I recall a thread on the Atlas forum started by the late Jim Weaver involving their first locomotive, the SW8/SW9. It was a guessing game of sorts. Basically, the decision was based on eras covered -- transition to the present, roads that used it -- a lot, flexibility -- yard and local freight, variants -- SW900. Very successful model.

 

From a business standpoint, particularly with the rampant spread of three-rail rivet counting (admit it, guys; you'll feel better), there are factors similar to those Atlas used with the SW. How they can maximize the use of the tooling and production investment with something that will sell. The level of detail being demanded raises production and tooling costs, so that has to be amortized across multiple unit sales. In the past, you could get away with non-prototypical equipment in the 3-rail market, but not so much any more (heritage units aside). So the new offerings seem to be much more selective -- perennial favorites (F-units, E-units, certain steam, popular diesels). I haven't seen a lot of one-offs (road unique) unless there's some historical significance (S2 Turbine, DD40Ax, AGEIR box cab, Cab-forwards, Big Boys, Challengers, etc.). I'm still hoping for that CF7, but while it's historically significant in its creation, Santa Fe was the only road that had them (ironically, they're all over the place in branch line/industrial service).

 

Dave,

Far be it from me & forgive for asking, I don’t mean to pry, but if you have limited yourself to keeping within your niche, only offering / importing O-Scale models of trains older than those running in 1899, how is that different from what bob2 said that you chose to build what you like? Why would SMR trains, the business, not the hobbyist running SMR Trains do this? I sort of understand how other low-volume high-end importers offer high-priced models of trains running in the late steam /early diesel / transition era due to the preferences of the aging demographics with considerable disposable income, but for the trains you offer, there must not be any hobbyist old enough to still remember them running.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Naveen,

 

The reasons are very clear when you think about it.  By creating a niche business, a small company can dominate their market.  SMR does not have the capital to compete by producing yet another variation of a Hudson or Big Boy. So why do it?  Why be part of a pack snarling over the same picked-clean bones?  I consider myself a pioneer, not a follower.  The decision to focus on a particular era was a practical one, building one of the key strengths of the company - being a professional historian with considerable knowledge of the subject, combined with limited financial resources. Finally, I reject the label of "hobbyist" because a hobbyist is usually not an entrepreneur concerned with building a profitable business.

 

Age demographics does not explain what model is built.  Some models are nostalgia-oriented, but the idea that folks only buy what they grew up with is a false one.  There are plenty of folks buying 20th Century steam who were born after or were very young when the last ones stopped running in revenue service.  Pretty much anyone under 60.  I dare say many on this board are in that category.

 

Dave 

Last edited by Dave Schneider

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×