Skip to main content

Are Williams steam engines--brass-- compare to others-Lionel, MTH, Weaver,-etc? There are several Williams units up for sale and being new to O scale, I need some honest opinions. I know how the die-cast engines run and some of the detail is hard to believe. Is it worth the money to go with brass or does the die cast run better and brass is looking good and running poorly?

Thanks,
Frank
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

If you don't mind getting your hands dirty detailing engines there are no better than Williams brass.

Also if you're interested in mechanics and would be interested in improving the operating performance of your engines to your own specs there are none better than Williams brass steamers.

They are hand-made scale models that are very easy to "super detail."
My main concern with the Williams line is the running/appearence quality. I can add detail with no problems and improving the running quality be it remotoring or special machining is not a problem. I take it that they are true scale, not a shrunken version to take sharp radius track. I understand that the pre- Bachmann engines are the ones to have,and the first series are to stay away from. The cost of these brass engines in O scale are cheaper than N scale units of the same engine,there has to be something wrong with them that I haven't seen or heard about. The same engine in cast potmetal is 2 or 3 times the cost of the brass, hand assembled model. I guess I have to live and learn about O scale!
Thanks
Frank
I have both the streamlined and regular K4s that were made in the late 1980s. The detail is not as good as today's scale diecasts. The motors are smooth running, smoke units may as well not exist, they cannot be set to run "forward-only", and no whistle or bell. If you plan on running them as-is, the cost is fine. If you want to upgrade, I think you'd be better off buying something that already comes with the features you want.

Williams engines just run and run and run.  Whey you are operating 4 engines at once no one can listen to the crew talk.  Great pullers and just enjoy operating them without the worry of a dead battery, fried board or if it flips over.  Nothing fancy, just durable.  You cannot  go wrong on the old Crown Edition from Williams as they were built to operate and keep on operating ala Timex. 

Originally Posted by AL CLAIR:

If you like plane janes, the new 4-6-0 is a great locomotive.  A lot of bang for your buck.

Al

Yes, its a fantastic runner.  Very plain though, but again, you can detail it yourself if so inclined.  Maybe the best slow steamer (inc conventional) I have ever seen, with the exception of the vision Hudson.

I wish someone would post a video of the new WB 4-6-0 running on their layout, I am curious if it slows down a lot on curves etc...such as a 36 curve. i have MTH with proto 2 steamers but was really interested in this loco. I once owned an Atlas 4-4-2 but was disappointed in the slow speed performance. Seems like everyone loves the new 4-6-0 and for the price looks like a bargain. 

I have 4 Williams PRR locomotives (a B6sb, an L-1, and 2 K-4s).  They are Crown Edition engines from the 1990s that I bought for $350-475 in 2001-2003.  They run great and pull really well.  They are very smooth runners.  All 4 engines have TrainAmerica installed TMCC and electro-couplers on the tenders.  The B6sb has an electrocoupler up front.  The L-1 and both K4s have EOB and Railsounds 4.0.

 

Below is a photo taken by my friend Mike Mattei.  This was taken at an open house I held in January 2011.  This Williams locomotive ran pretty much continuously for 2 hours.  Again it's a great runner and very durable.

 

Ogauger - would you contact me off list about super-detailing these engines?  I would like to know more.

 

1160136026_5hZYJ-L

 

Thanks,

 

George

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1160136026_5hZYJ-L
Last edited by G3750
Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×