Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The most useful length measurement of a railroad car is over “pulling faces”. That is the inside face of the coupler knuckle. That is the point that is in common with the adjacent cars. If the pulling face dimensions are added together you end up with the train length. The other dimension of importance on a freight car is the interior length. That tells the customer how much freight they can get in the car. When people talk about 40 foot or 50 foot boxcars, those are the interior lengths of the cars.

Except you can’t measure most O gauge trains from coupler face to coupler face to get a proper scale match to the prototype. That’s because the couplers, which are grossly oversized already, have longer shafts and are designed to create greater spaces between cars.

When doing fine modeling, you need prototype dimensions of the body. That’s how the bodies are supposed to be scaled in O gauge.

Naturally, because of the couplers, O gauge cars and locomotives will always measure longer from coupler face to coupler face.

Thankyou Jim….one day I hope to attain the level of skill and knowledge many on this forum have, and the knowledge you share with me is greatly appreciated.  Being the simpleton that I am, I was trying to sixteen inches of length that the cars were supposed to be.  What I have found out is cool cause it’s just like life, the deeper you go into something, real accuracy counts.

I appreciate anybody who throws down their thoughts and/or opinions…..or shall I say , thanks for the education….today and in the future

Passenger cars "official" length for description and use as opposed to train length is measured differently than freight.    Generally the length described does not include the vestibule.    For example PRR had P70 and P54 coaches.    These were described 70 foot and 54 feet long respectively.    However, this dimension is inside the vestibules, so the cars are quite a bit longer overall.     To carry this on, the B70 baggage car was 70 feet inside similar to freight cars.

I think many RRs and car builders used this type of description for passenger cars.

I see that our models are different than reality….when I bought these Williams coaches, the description said 16 in…. I really appreciate seeing how the models and real trains differ…I have never even been on a train, except NYC subways when we visited my grandma…thanks for education, as a teacher I admire the knowledge on this forum…appreciate you prrjim

@Catdaddy posted:

I see that our models are different than reality….when I bought these Williams coaches, the description said 16 in…. I really appreciate seeing how the models and real trains differ…I have never even been on a train, except NYC subways when we visited my grandma…thanks for education, as a teacher I admire the knowledge on this forum…appreciate you prrjim

measure the body, not the couplers. that's the car length.   

When I did that , I was short of the 16….when I went coupler end to coupler end I got 16…..I wondered  if they happen to use a different source of couplers if the 16 in description is then accurate…I am going to go back and reread the description. Can car length and total length be different…I am going to get one of coaches and measure , and post a picture. I am a curios type, so this discussion is helping me understand . Dave, thanks for your response, I appreciate you.

@Catdaddy posted:

When I did that , I was short of the 16….when I went coupler end to coupler end I got 16…..I wondered  if they happen to use a different source of couplers if the 16 in description is then accurate…I am going to go back and reread the description. Can car length and total length be different…I am going to get one of coaches and measure , and post a picture. I am a curios type, so this discussion is helping me understand . Dave, thanks for your response, I appreciate you.

I see. The big problem , is that the 3rail Toy Train Manufacturer's make an abbreviated version a car, not a scale representation, as in a prototype. (they measure them wrong! )  An 80' car in O is 20" not 21".(as they advertise)  As far as getting you cars , its probably safe, to go with their description, enjoy them and have fun!

If you have a favorite railroad (mine is the long gone Pennsylvania RR), you can search for copies of their car (freight and passenger) and locomotive design diagrams.  On those diagrams, you will find all kinds of dimensions listed like coupler face-to-coupler face length, measurements of trucks (including diameters of wheels, distances between wheels, distances between truck centers, etc.), various height measurements and others.  These diagrams might be found online or in books, and they can be very useful tools if you are trying for model accuracy.

Unfortunately, there is no manufacturing standard for model measurement.  So a model listed as 16" might be measured from body end-to-body end or it might be measured from outside edge of coupler-to-outside edge of coupler or in some other unspecified method.  Regardless, with the prototype info described above, you can use a ruler or other measuring instrument to determine how "accurately" the model you are looking at was built.

Chuck

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×