Skip to main content

I finally received one of my MTH IC TOFC's.  (The order got messed up, I'm waiting for the other one)  Better late than never, I suppose.

This is the scale wheel version.  So, let's see what we have here...

The first thing we notice is the box is less of a space waster than the old SHS box:

rTOFC 062616 001

Within is the trailer, flat, a packet with the 5th wheel (tucked away in a hole in upper right of the Styrofoam packing) and an instruction manual (!)  The manual is for assembly and installation of the fifth wheel.

rTOFC 062616 002

With the fifth wheel installed, we gat a car similar to the old SHS model.  The obvious change being the use of MTH's O27 RailKing trailer. More on it later.  Lettering on both the car and trailer is sharp and clear, although the white lettering on the trail may be a tad thick.

rTOFC 062616 003

The weight, minus trailer, is the same as the old SHS car: 10oz.

The big difference from SHS is the decking is painted the color same as the car.  SHS had the decking as unpainted tan plastic, painted gray plastic or later a "weathered" tan plastic. (The weathering on the SHS car deck illustrated is self-applied.)

rTOFC 062616 004

At first, the painted decking bothered me, but the molded in wood grain creates enough of a contrast so the color isn't so monolithic as I first though it would be.  A little weathering will help here.

rTOFC 062616 004a

Years ago, either B.T.S or Building & Structures Company offered a laser-cut wood deck for the SHS flat cars, but they seem to be no longer available.

Another difference is in the trucks. MTH used polished metal wheels and apparently painted trucks where SHS used blackend metal wheels and trucks.  The MTH wheels could use a little flat black, rail brown or Dullcoat on their faces to tone the reflectivity down a bit.  On the Scale version, the former SHS Kadee compatible couplers are installed, on the SHS car, Kadee (or compatible) couplers were a purchaser responsibility.

rTOFC 062616 005

On to the trailer:

rTOFC 062616 006

The MTH RailKing trailer is noticeably larger than the SHS trailer.  It's also more modern.  I'm told the MTH trailer measures out in all dimensions to a 50' trailer in S, but I haven taken my scale rule to it.  I'll let the pictures do the talking.

rTOFC 062616 007

rTOFC 062616 008rTOFC 062616 009

Overall, the MTH trailer looks OK, but there seems to be a certain "Godzilla" quality about it.

rTOFC 062616 010rTOFC 062616 010a

Differences from the old SHS car aside, it's good to have the TOFC car back in S circulation.

Rusty

Attachments

Images (12)
  • rTOFC 062616 001
  • rTOFC 062616 002
  • rTOFC 062616 003
  • rTOFC 062616 004
  • rTOFC 062616 004a
  • rTOFC 062616 005
  • rTOFC 062616 006
  • rTOFC 062616 007
  • rTOFC 062616 008
  • rTOFC 062616 009
  • rTOFC 062616 010
  • rTOFC 062616 010a
Last edited by Rusty Traque
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Just for fun, I tried out the trailer from an M2 Machines Auto Hauler and found that it is not as tall as the MTH trailer but is the same length. 

The Auto Hauler trailers seem to have a lot of Automotive related themes but they are easy to disassemble and repaint and decal if one were to wish to do so. The trailers with a tractor retail for about $ 10-16.00 and usually can be found at WalMart or from an Online retailer of 1/64 diecast.

You can see what has been issued in the past at http://www.m2machines.com/auto-haulers-p.1.html

LittleTommy

 

 

laming posted:

Nice review, Rusty.

As a former trucker and truck enthusiast, the MTH trailer is so wrong for that flat. No way you would find a 50' trailer on a flatcar during the 50's, 60's, or even the 70's, as I recall. (I was hauling 45' trailers behind me in the late 70's.)

Oh well... at least MTH is actually coming out with a trickle of S product!

 

Plus, the 89' piggy back flat was introduced in 1961.  Pretty sure by the mid sixties, the 50' or 60' piggy back flats were removed from TOFC service.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

Of course, it's all about perception and in my mind this is a case where perception trumps scale dimensions.

Now, the IC did have some 47' trailers of the same style.  There's a picture of one sharing a 89' Trailer Train flat in the IC Freight Cars in Color book, and it looks quite at home there.  Plus, I remember seeing them trundle by on their way to Freeport.

Doubtless, the MTH trailer would look better on an 89' flat if one was available in S.  Might even look better because if I recall correctly, the 89' TTX flats had a lower deck than the GSC 53' flat.

MTH is to be congratulated for finally getting the TOFC car out, and probably saved a couple of bucks using their RailKing trailer, but I suspect I'll pass on future TOFC offerings.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

My final thoughts on the subject.  (And the crowd goes wild...)

My second IC car arrived this week and when paired up, they don't look as top heavy as a single car does.TOFC 070316 004

However, I still can't shake the feeling that sumptin' ain't quite right when other equipment is added:

TOFC 070316 006

Oh, well.  They are what they are and all my carping isn't going to make them any lower.  They're still nice looking cars.

Rusty

Attachments

Images (2)
  • TOFC 070316 004
  • TOFC 070316 006

Unfortunately, an SD70ACe wouldn't be pulling a solid bearing (which were outlawed by the late 1980's) trucked 53' flat car with or without a 50's-60's decorated trailer under any conditions.  I don't think today's railroads are even equipped to maintain solid bearing trucks anymore.

I had a chance last week to page through a 1966 Carbuilders Cyclopedia.  There is a difference in deck height between a standard flat car and a purpose built trailer flat.  The trailer flat's deck is 5-1/2" lower than a standard flat.  Not much I'll admit, about 3/32" in S, but a difference none the less.

I'm not a dyed-in-the wool rivet counter.  My IC FP7's, plus the fact that I'm primarily a Freelancer (what they seem to call "Fantasy" nowadays...) will attest to that.  But, I do try to generally recreate an era (a somewhat elastic late 50's-early 60's) more by ambiance than exacting detail and these trailers wind up a little outside that bubble.  Sure, I have some SD70's and more modern freight cars, but they tend to make the occasional guest appearance rather than being a permanent part of the scene.

However, I'm gonna keep these cars because they do remind me of seeing similar trailers on various IC trains as they passed through town.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

I have just received my NASG Western Maryland convention TOFC.  What a disappointment to have an O27 Old Bay trailer plopped onto the back of a former S Helper flat car.  This is way too big, and a real bummer.  I love having another WM car, but this trailer won't be the load it will be carrying.  Wrong scale, wrong era, and wrong of MTH to be foisting this on us.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Side by side TOFC
banjoflyer posted:
LittleTommy posted:

Just for fun, I tried out the trailer from an M2 Machines Auto Hauler and found that it is not as tall as the MTH trailer but is the same length. 

 

 

 

Tommy, thanks for a great idea! I have one of those trailers so I had to try it myself.

Here's that car hauler with a fresh load of new 1957 Chevy's. It's riding on my modified AM MKT flat car. The side boards have to be removed for the trailers tires to fit the floor. Same thing on an SHS flatcar. With an M2 machines 1957 Chevy on top of the trailer the total height from the top of the ties on a piece of SHS track is exactly 4 inches. Now that's an exciting load for our S scale flatcars!.

HPIM3232

Mark

 

As long as this thread surfaced again, I gave some thought to putting the MTH TOFC's in a train rather than as individual cars.  So, today I dragged out all my scale wheeled TOFC's and took some pictures to try and put things in some kind of context.  They are purposely arranged to try to compare height:

KGB 091717 002KGB 091717 005KGB 091717 007KGB 091717 008

I've never assembled all these in one train before, but have from time to time run them in other trains.

Conclusion: In a train of TOFC's, the MTH version doesn't stick out so much like a sore thumb and does "blend" better with AM's cars than SHS's.  The MTH trailer still looks a little uncomfortable on the 50' flat, though.

But, I think I'll pretty much stick with the old SHS cars in my late 50's era railroad.  When wandering the time warp that orbits in my basement occasionally slips things into the late  60's and early 70's, I'll run the AM and MTH cars.

Rusty

Attachments

Images (4)
  • KGB 091717 002
  • KGB 091717 005
  • KGB 091717 007
  • KGB 091717 008

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×