Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

jojofry posted:

The cc2 wasnt a big engine and it had a swinging bell . 

For an articulated,no, but compared to a consolidation yes. It has about double the boiler length to put "whizz bang" goodies in.

Image result for lionel cc2 vision

 

In fact, if I recall correctly did not the CC2 have issues with motor failure due to being undersized for the loco?

One could speculate possibly the undersized motor allowed for more room for the CC2 goodies.

The H9/10 already has a small motor to begin with, I'd prefer they omit the swinging bell so it doesn't end up with a PE starter set motor.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • blobid0
Last edited by RickO

A friend has  A CC2 on lease on the P&W and I have run it at operating sessions more than once.   I has performed very well switching a half dozen industies and hauling as 12-15 car train back and forth from the yard.   Train length is a swag, I ran the train and made a bunch of moves with no problems with the motor or traction.

KOOLjock1 posted:

So here's what bugs me about putting a swinging bell on a K4, H10, H9, G5 etc... If you get the swinging bell, then the sound system has to match.  And those engines made a ding ding ding ding sound... not a ding...dong...ding...dong sound.

Jon

But then who's the ding dong?

The person who orders one when the real one didn't have one?..... Or lionel for advertising it and not putting it on the model?

RICKO,

 Someone has already stated that the engine crew could use a line to the bell in case the auto ringer was broken. So a ding dong would be appropriate. If a rivet counter says it should be an auto ring that goes ding ding ding tell them its broken and the crew is swinging the bell. Who really cares the swinging bell is a real nice feature. Looked great on the CC2 vision line engine as well as the vision Hudson. I hate to say it but I think you are over thinking this. It is a toy train. I am going to pre-order the Pennsy Lines H10 as I do like the CC2 tender. My line for why a Pennsy Line engine in my all Pennsy fleet. Its in Altoona for upgrading. The smoking whistle is enough for me but if Lionel throws in a swinging bell I say go for it.

Just have fun with the engine

JohnB

I was interested when I first saw it but looking closely I realized the casting is exactly the same as my TMCC/ODESSEY version from 2001.  It is actually an H9 not  an H10 (cylinders are different).  A swing bell would cool but also wrong since the prototype had a pneumatic ringer.  Having worked on mine, I know there is no way you're getting a speaker in that boiler casting.  I've extensively upgraded mine with fan smoke, LED lighting and GRJ's chuff generator and super chuffer.  I'm sure the Legacy sounds are better than the original TMCC but that is not enough for me to buy one.  On the other hand, I have always like the Niagara.

Danr posted:

I was interested when I first saw it but looking closely I realized the casting is exactly the same as my TMCC/ODESSEY version from 2001.  It is actually an H9 not  an H10 (cylinders are different).  A swing bell would cool but also wrong since the prototype had a pneumatic ringer.  Having worked on mine, I know there is no way you're getting a speaker in that boiler casting.  I've extensively upgraded mine with fan smoke, LED lighting and GRJ's chuff generator and super chuffer.  I'm sure the Legacy sounds are better than the original TMCC but that is not enough for me to buy one.  On the other hand, I have always like the Niagara.

Dan, did you by chance change the pilot so that it had the steps on either side of the coupler? I had to make some changes to my 2001 version after the pilot extension for the front coupler broke in an unfortunate incident. I added an MTH coupler part (not remote) that allowed me to mount it so that it alllowed enough swing to use it as a switcher.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×