On a related thread Remove of Lionel Thumbtacks
IRISH RIFLE posted:
The new trucks and thump-tack couplers sure are horrible. The good news going forward, however, after talking to Ryan Kunkle at the Amherst Train Show, is that Lionel recognizes the mistake they made and will return to their die-cast sprung trucks and couplers with hidden uncoupling tabs, although it will likely be a gradual transition. The first step we will see will be with the freight-sounds PS-1 Boxcars in the current catalogue, which will probably have the current trucks, but will have couplers with hidden uncoupling tabs. Based upon that, I ordered a couple of them, the first time I have ordered any new Lionel scale rolling stock since the decision to scrap the former trucks and couplers.
This is really good news that Lionel sees the problem and is going to take action. I am one of those collectors that is anti-thumbtack but yes, can easily overlook the large coupler. Let's not get into one of those debates in this thread since it was pretty well debated previously in thread Lionel Going Backward with Couplers? I returned my 2018 pre-order rolling stock that arrived with thumbtacks and spring (non-sprung) trucks. The catalogue depicted hidden uncoupling tabs but product arrived differently. I do like quite a bit of the 2018 and 2019 rolling stock but will pass based on the trucks. However, I have a suggestion for Lionel that would change my entire perspective on 2018 and 2019 rolling stock purchases.
Can you say "Exchange Program?"
Now that Lionel states it will be producing the previous style trucks they should consider exchanging trucks for people that want to take the effort. This way the newer truck still makes the 2 rail/ Kadee converter club happy, wins back the anti-thumbtack group (Lion's share), and keeps happy those that don't care or don't know. Simply send in your 2018/2019 style thumbtack trucks and Lionel will promptly send back the replacements. I would be even willing to foot the shipping one way.
Would any other OGR members be in support of this?