The bridge pictured in the attached has an early German look about it but there are no manufacturers’ marks present. It has no tracks but the pins at each end suggest it was made to connect to other sections. It is 10 3/4” long, 4” wide and 4 1/2” high. Can anyone identify it for me?
Replies sorted oldest to newest
The metal stampings for the arched girders is Bing. I can't find an exact match for the rest but the 1912 catalog does illustrate a 5 piece bridge (10150) that has rounded supports and two separate sections on either side of the arched section that have railings and lamps. The illustration does not show the connector pins but I could see where those pins might have attached to the railing sections. The problem is the illustration indicates the arched section and the railing section share a single support whereas your bridge piece does not allow for that kind of support sharing. Given the excess soldering that appears to have been done to your span I wonder if that might indicate a home modification to change the location of the supports at some later date.
The bridge below is a later rendition of the bridge span ca 1925 but, as you can see, the arched girder stamping is the same.
Attachments
Thanks, Robert. Your analysis makes sense. I have the book Trains from my Grandfathers Attic, but it is still packed from a recent move. I’ll check out the reference. Thanks again.
Certainly looks more like mine, but my Bridge has no track or holders for track. I’ll settle for Bing or Carette any day!
I’m beginning to think that an anonymous manufacturer made these bridges for several of the above mentioned brands. Who knows?
Thanks Arne, that is the bridge I was referencing in the post above. It's also why I said I think BlueComet931's span has been modified since the stone supports in the catalog cut suggest the supports are shared by the arch and hand rail sections of the bridge. Out of curiosity, have you ever seen a complete 10150 bridge?
Arne posted:
Did not see that listed in the 1913 catalog I was able to access. I need older Bing catalogs, I guess. Thanks for clearing this up, Arne.