Skip to main content

Updated 8/31/2021:

OK!!  More forward progress was made today.  The hillside in front of the Eastern Approach got painted - it's first coat of the Behr color I use for terrain.  It's called Desert Clay.  I guess I could have kept it white and let it portray a snow scene (now where are my Dept 56 snow-globes and buildings?    ), but I decided to paint it.  It will get another coat / touch-up tomorrow.

IMG_1545IMG_1546IMG_1547IMG_1548

I like this scenery approach, but it does soak up a lot of paint.

More when I know it. 

George

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_1545
  • IMG_1546
  • IMG_1547
  • IMG_1548
@douger posted:

Where do you live George I would like to come a see your layout?

Couple of thoughts on that:

  1. The layout really isn't ready for visitors yet.  It's a construction zone and there isn't a whole lot of it completed.
  2. The Covid-19 D variant is hitting Pennsylvania pretty hard at the moment.


If things smooth out and I make the anticipated amount of progress, then by next April (my NMRA Division's Model Train Jamboree) my layout will be open for touring.  Until then, I'm not even letting local NMRA division members in for a look.

I will keep you on the list.  In the meantime, please "Like" the thread.

George

@BillYo414 posted:

Is the paint intended to make it look like a field of grain? Or is that just what I interpreted?

No, the paint is intended to provide a backup earth tone.  The area will get (from the tracks outward) ballast, cinders, grass / vegetation / weeds.  In the vegetation area, there will be (probably) be some bald spots.  I don't want white foam to be visible.

George

@G3750 posted:

Updated 8/31/2021:

OK!!  More forward progress was made today.  The hillside in front of the Eastern Approach got painted - it's first coat of the Behr color I use for terrain.  It's called Desert Clay.  I guess I could have kept it white and let it portray a snow scene (now where are my Dept 56 snow-globes and buildings?    ), but I decided to paint it.  It will get another coat / touch-up tomorrow.

IMG_1545IMG_1546IMG_1547IMG_1548

I like this scenery approach, but it does soak up a lot of paint.

More when I know it. 

George

George, that has got to be the coolest thing I have ever seen when it comes to making some scenery of long banks, hills or such. That is amazing, can't wait to see what it looks like when it is done. Sorry I've been on and off for a big stretch over here. Can't seem to catch up(not ketchup). Just don't seem to find the time half the time because of topics that pop up that I don't seen to find that interesting which bury those that I do. One day there was 6 topics that wasted my time, which came back up because of people I follow. Better to follow them than lose out on something interesting, so I tolerate it. Just wish that I had more time.

@G3750 posted:

No, the paint is intended to provide a backup earth tone.  The area will get (from the tracks outward) ballast, cinders, grass / vegetation / weeds.  In the vegetation area, there will be (probably) be some bald spots.  I don't want white foam to be visible.

George

George,

  That embankment came out very nice. Looks like dead grass/vegetation.

Tom

George, that has got to be the coolest thing I have ever seen when it comes to making some scenery of long banks, hills or such. That is amazing, can't wait to see what it looks like when it is done. Sorry I've been on and off for a big stretch over here. Can't seem to catch up(not ketchup). Just don't seem to find the time half the time because of topics that pop up that I don't seen to find that interesting which bury those that I do. One day there was 6 topics that wasted my time, which came back up because of people I follow. Better to follow them than lose out on something interesting, so I tolerate it. Just wish that I had more time.

Thank you, Dave.  The technique is pretty simple, actually.  It just took me a few tries to do it for that distance.  But once you get started, the whole thing took minutes.

George

Updated 9/5/2021:

Working on the conduit for the Stone Arch, the scenery and backwater in front of it, and an "H" fixture (double line pole).

I built supports for the conduit out of Plastruct angles, wire, and Tichy NBWs.  Tonight I got the courage to actually try installing them on top of the stone arch.  They are a scale 9' apart across the face of the arch.  I still need to install the conduit as well as some cinders and vegetation.

IMG_1572IMG_1570

More when I know it. 

George

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_1572
  • IMG_1570

George,

The conduit turned out very nice. Is it for drainage off of the railroad? If it looks like other areas of the arch bridge I'm sure it has overgrowth all around it.

Dave

Great question, Dave.

Actually, no.  It's not for drainage.  Check out the photo below.  See the telephone / telegraph wires heading out to the bridge?  They end at that "H" fixture (it's actually got 3 vertical poles).  In the era depicted below (1950s? or earlier), there has to be a way to get those lines across the river.  Almost certainly, that means a conduit of some sort which must pass either on top of the stone arch (it's solid rock) or on the southern face.  Once west of the stone arch, it most likely passes under and into the trusswork of the approach span.

Bridge - K4 in the fog

So this is my interpretation / guesswork / modeler's license.  And I've been researching that unique "H" fixture.  I plan to model it.

George

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Bridge - K4 in the fog
Last edited by G3750

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×