Skip to main content

9 replies

Railfan cover 4014 OOPS

p51p51OGR Forum Member

I got the July issue of Railfan at the local Barnes and Noble yesterday and noticed a serious goof up on the cover:

cover

They have a photo of UP 4014 and right away I noticed the number board had an extra digit on the fireman’s side and an extra marker lamp. What they did was when they digitally put the magazine masthead behind the top of the locomotive, they did a bad job of putting the engine back over the words, so there was an overlap in that corner.
Odder still, a friend's subscription copy doesn’t have the error.
I can only assume they made one production run with the error, realized they had messed up the cover, then went back and printed more with the cover looking as they’d intended. I’ll be sure to keep this one, as I have a feeling this will be something train fans will be talking about for a while (and I now know that not every issue has the error).
I'm thinking of calling this, "Big Boyy, the race to publish"...

Attachments

Hide
Images (1)
  • cover
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

p51p51OGR Forum Member

Geez, Erik, i didn't even notice your name on the shot. Excellent photo!

Otto does indeed rock. I've talked with him in person at Winterrail this year, and I'm currently working with him to get a layout article into RMC.

This is one of the corrected versions, from a good friend of mine in Florida, a subscription copy.

64314

It makes me wonder how many of the "40144" ones got printed. In some way, they'll be considered more "collectible" than the correctly printed image, I'm sure.

Heck, the error ones might be worth as much as ten cents more in a few years!

Attachments

Hide
Images (1)
  • 64314
Last edited by p51
p51p51OGR Forum Member
Dominic Mazoch posted:

But there is still an error.  On the UP side.  How can you have a race with just one train?

UP was going to have two trains if memory serves, each pulled by steam (844 and 4014 as UP has enough coaches for both). That went out the window when the UP steam team got so close to the deadline they had to have 844 along just in case 4014 wouldn't make such a long trip for it's first real outing.

Thankfully the worry was for nothing and 4014 apparently did just fine.

But yeah, the race never happened.

StuartStuartOGR Forum Member

That's okay. Meanwhile the folks over at Kalmbach had some mistakes in the special Big Boy magazine.  The most serious was identifying diesels 4014 and 4884 (the two that pulled Big Boy 4014 from Pomona to Cheyenne) as SD70ACe's instead of SD70M's.  I attributed the errors are a result of wanting to get the issue out quickly after the special run to Ogden.

Stuart

 

Add Reply

Views: 801
Post

Membership Required

We're sorry. You must be signed in to continue. Sign In or Register
×
Are you sure you want to remove from your Block List?
×
Loading...
×
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×

Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership

OGR Forum Supporting Membership

Help support this forum with an OGR Forum Supporting Membership.
You will be able to watch the videos in the INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO FORUM!
A one-year OGR Forum Supporting Membership is only $12 per year, so sign up now!


    OR     


Access the ALL the OGR VIDEO FORUMS AND  over 300 back issues of OGR
with a DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION!



$12.00 per 12 Months (plus tax if applicable)
×