Skip to main content

I need a stiff Bourbon.  I completed wiring up a Ross #6 crossover and two Ross #8 curved turnouts last weekend, with the DZ-1008, and screwed the track down.  Ordered 4 more DZ-1008s to cover additional turnouts not considered in the earlier order, a week ago.  Obviously, this is a vastly superior solution, not only because of the common rail selection but also because it eliminates the dependency on the grossly undersized DZ-1008 relay contact wires (what's the point of a 10A relay with #24 wires connected to it, despite their short length?).  At this point, I'll have to try out my inventory of rolling stock to see if I'll have any problems, before I pull things up and rewire (or add ugly visible wires soldered to outside of rails).

OK, what I think is my "final" PCB version samples came back and I built a couple of them.  This is an all thru-hole design to make it easier for folks to assemble.  I can't imagine enough volume to do an assembled production run of these, so I'll be ordering a batch of blank boards and supplying a kit of parts for folks that want some of these.

This final layout reduced the size of the board to 1.05" x 1.05", the two jumpers to minimize the external wiring were moved to the edge of the board and the footprint was made compatible with standard .1" jumper blocks.

Given the design of the board and the opto-isolation of the trigger, this board can actually be used for a number of applications, but my goal in designing it was to enhance the operation of my Ross switches by switching both the hot and neutral rails to better maintain continuity through the longer switches and the double-slip switches.

DZ-Replacement Relay 1.2 Thru-Hole Graphic

DZ-Replacement Relay 1.2 Thru-Hole Schematic

Attachments

Images (2)
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.2 Thru-Hole Graphic
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.2 Thru-Hole Schematic

John, this "final" incarnation looks great! Might you consider making the gerbers available on the forum for those of us who may want to roll our own? I would cheerfully buy a few kits from you but the truth is I already have all components in my parts boxes, including these exact relays, so it might not make much sense?

Thanks either way,

Rod

Last edited by Rod Stewart

Great John, thanks again. We have an RCS 175M double xover on our train show layout modules that will benefit from one of these. Shorter engines were sometimes left high and dry if passing across this guy too slowly. This relay board should help. If things ever open up and we can do train shows again that is!

Not just sure what I will do with the other 8 boards yet...........?

Rod

Got a few of 1008's on a club layout that are junk. Would love to replace them with this. How would this get wired up in line with the DZ-1002 and DZ-1000?

They're actually wired like a DZ-1008 except you have the extra connection to the ground switching.  Normally, only one rail is switched between center rail and dead, I just added a contact so that the rails are switched between center rail and outside rail.

Hello GRJ,  I have a lot of these "Walthers Layout Control System -- Vertical-Mount Switch Machine and also Walthers Layout Control System -- Distribution Block"  , you can find the write up here:    "https://www.walthers.com/products/layout/track-and-accessories/switch-machine-turnout-accessory"

Do you think your new boards would work with these machines?   If so, I'm very interested in using them where they are needed.   Thanks in advance,    WNYJOHN

@NYC 428 posted:

Just one to start so I can see how it works.

A kit or finished would be fine, but the kit would need good instructions.

Here's what the instructions look like, not a lot to say, it's just a PCB kit building exercise.  I have one kit still packed up here.  If you want it, drop me a line on my profile email address.

<---click on graphic to expand--->

DZ-Replacement

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DZ-Replacement

So I have mapped out how I think this could work with an RCS 175 crossover, as follows:

RCS 175M Double Crossover

Board Connections

The switches are assumed to be thrown in diagonal pairs.

1 & 2 are trigger signal, active only when the switch is thrown to the A-A route.

3 & 4 are accessory power (preferred), or track power if running command.

Board Connections with J1 & J2 both jumpered:

5 is to both diamond tracks #2

6 is to track power center rail hot

7 is to both diamond tracks #1

8 is same as 7; N/C

9 is to outside rails common

10 is same as 5; N/C

So did I get this right? The only relay connections are contacts 5, 6, 7 and 9. Is this how you folks that have wired up a 175 are doing it? All that is being switched here is the 4 short diamond rails.

The only time the relay gets triggered is in the crossover A-A route position. It remains untriggered in all other conditions. The untriggered condition sets the diamond rails for route B-B crossovers by default.

What about the curved leadin rails of each switch. Do they need to be grounded when the respective crossover route is selected? It's likely better if they are, but is this necessary? They likely ground OK by contact with the outside rail when the switch is in the turnout position.

Rod

Attachments

Images (2)
  • RCS 175M Double Crossover
  • Board Connections
@AlanRail posted:

Rod

your circuit seems to use one DZ-2502 to control all four machines.

According to Zander, you cannot operate the 4 switch machines with one DZ-2502, you need at least two.

Well I just downloaded and reproduced the DZ hookup drawing, not really paying much attention to number of DZ-2502 switches. if it needs two, well fine I guess. I am really just trying to figure out the best way to hookup grj's replacement relay to toggle the short diamond rails. But thanks!

Rod

@Ken Wing posted:

If you limit the throw to all four straight, or all four curved, 1 controller can do it. If you want to control each crossover separately, throwing two at a time, 2 controllers are needed.

That would surely simplify the switch operation. Trouble is the diamond rail pairs 1 and 2 need to be alternately powered or grounded depending on the direction of crossover. For instance if its a B-B route then both rails 2 are hot and both rails 1 are grounded. And for an A-A route its exactly opposite. So you really can't have all 4 switches in turnout position, it has to be one crossover route or the other. At least that's the way I see it unless my relay hookup is totally wrong.

I am kinda hoping that grj or someone else who has used these relay boards will chime in here and show us how they hooked it all up.

Rod

Last edited by Rod Stewart

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×