Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by rockstars1989:

What do you think?Are smoking cabooses needed?Yea they look cool when they are working.However it is almost a full time job keeping the smoke units working in my engines.At times sending them to the shop for repair or replacement.IMO not worth the hassle.Nick

Prefer just a scale stack. Guests at a friends who turns them on seem to notice fluid spills on the roof rather than any visible smoke. Lower price would be well worth the loss of the smoke unit.

 

What REALLY needs to be done is make the lighting intensity at realistic levels. The build engines to run at 18 volts and the caboose is near melting at 12 volts...

Originally Posted by rockstars1989:

What do you think?Are smoking cabooses needed?Yea they look cool when they are working.However it is almost a full time job keeping the smoke units working in my engines.At times sending them to the shop for repair or replacement.IMO not worth the hassle.Nick

In my opinion, I wish the manufacturers would concentrate of proper illuminated rear marker lamps and forget the smoke units. Those very expensive, and prototypically accurate, UP CA-4 cabooses that Lionel brought out some years ago, had NO rear marker lamps, yet came with a smoke unit! Go figure.

Last edited by Hot Water

I see smoke units working far better with a die cast caboose than plastic, the paint might suffer but not the body.

 

Always found it odd light up cabooses are popular, yet would be rather hard to see out of at night if lit up, the low glow of a fire box would be more acceptable.

 

Then I need to fix mine. It probably avoided the over heating issue from having a huge hole in the under carriage for the light mount, and the wires breaking insured it.

I never use the smoke units on cabooses. I might use one on a one-time basis for visitors to the layout, but it's way too much hassle for a long operating session at home or (especially) in a club situation where you have a lot of distractions. Let one go dry and you've got overheating and potentially a melted roof. Not worth it. I have one brass caboose that came with a Seuthe smoke unit and no off switch. Rather than go to the trouble of installing a switch, I just disconnected it. 

 

Some of the K-Line cabooses have a switch on the bottom for conventional vs. command operation. The command position reduces the voltage to the smoke unit so it doesn't overheat on constant 18v. I don't know how effective it is since I leave the smoke off. 

I have put the MTH HO fan driven smoke unit in a couple of these.  It doesn't get hot enough to melt anything, and with a variable power supply allows you to adjust the smoke volume with a simple screw adjustment.  I mount the supply so you can reach the adjustment screw from a hole in the bottom.  The smoke volume can be enough to easily see underway if that's your taste.

 

The next mod will be to have it TMCC controlled so you can have smoke on command.

 

Next one I do I'll try to remember to take pictures.

 

Originally Posted by abbrail:

There are two smoking cabooses in my collection - both by K-line. They always seem to draw more attention from visitors than the smoking locomotives. 

 

Fortunately, neither of my smoking cabooses have ever had any issues.

I have one smoking caboose.  I bought it because I liked it, and the price was reasonable.  The dealer pointed out to me that it had a smoke unit, which didn't matter to me.  I tried it out once, then turned it off and have not turned it on again.  I can only run any smoke units on my picnic table on the patio anyway, because they all set off my smoke detectors.

 

Now, if I ever ran it at a show like Thomas abbrail suggested, I would probably turn it on.  I'm sure it would draw a lot of favorable attention.

Originally Posted by dgauss:

I don't smoke.

Beat me to it! Maybe we need cigar scented smoke fluid....

 

In general I've really cut back on using smoke in general. Constantly having to tend to the car/engine, plus the overall mess on the unit and the track. It was a brief session of running Coal Scented smoke fluid that got the trains banned from under the Christmas Tree.

 

Gilly

Last edited by Gilly@N&W
I'd love it if they 1) didn't melt the roof and 2) could be seen.  I have 2 K-Line smoking cabooses, and after seeing the roof start to melt on one I turned them both off as I could never see any smoke come from them anyway.  I wish you could as I would love to have all cabooses smoking away.
 
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

I have put the MTH HO fan driven smoke unit in a couple of these.  It doesn't get hot enough to melt anything, and with a variable power supply allows you to adjust the smoke volume with a simple screw adjustment.  I mount the supply so you can reach the adjustment screw from a hole in the bottom.  The smoke volume can be enough to easily see underway if that's your taste.

 

The next mod will be to have it TMCC controlled so you can have smoke on command.

 

Next one I do I'll try to remember to take pictures.

 

I hope you write a how-to article and provide part numbers as I would love to do this with all of mine.

for stuff like the older smoking caboose models, you can put a switch with a diode for command operation.  They were designed for conventional, and 18 volts is just too much heat.  That will reduce the heat to a manageable level.  Also, a stick-on foil or insulation on the shell next to the smoke unit will help avoid excessive heat melting the plastic.

 

I love the look of a smoking caboose on a slow pass.  I have a good number of them but can't get some to work.  I've never tuned up a caboose smoke unit as I don't like to mess with taking cabeese apart.  I keep my K-Lines off due to the melting issue.  But watching the train slowly roll down the track and out of sight with the smoke gently wafting is a real treat.

 

Stack 

Last edited by Smoke Stack Lightnin
Originally Posted by abbrail:

...They always seem to draw more attention from visitors than the smoking locomotives. 

And if you use JT Megasteam "Bacon Frying" or "Coffee" scented smoke fluid at a show, it might be the only thing remembered by a significant other who was "dragged along".  If visitors can peer through a window and see the conductor standing over the stove, I'd think that would be the clincher!

Originally Posted by stan2004:
Originally Posted by abbrail:

...They always seem to draw more attention from visitors than the smoking locomotives. 

And if you use JT Megasteam "Bacon Frying" or "Coffee" scented smoke fluid at a show, it might be the only thing remembered by a significant other who was "dragged along".  If visitors can peer through a window and see the conductor standing over the stove, I'd think that would be the clincher!

I did not know they have Bacon smoke fluid.  I am getting some right now...

 I have 2 K-Line smoking cabooses, and after seeing the roof start to melt on one I turned them both off as I could never see any smoke come from them anyway.

I also have 2 K-Line smoking cabooses.  After hearing stories, I never turned on the smoke.

 

I had a Breakdown B that after triggering the breakdown, with gobs of smoke pouring out, the roof started to melt.  I sent it back to Lionel and they used stick on foil.

Originally Posted by handyandy:
 
How about a Cheech and Chong Van running down the street pouring smoke out the windows?
 
I turn off my smoke units. I don't understand smoking diesels anyway. Yes, when they first start up, white smoke may be appropriate. But under normal operation smoke out of the stacks would mean something terribly wrong with the prime mover. 

 

Instead of a smoking caboose, perhaps a Streets van with smoke pouring out the windows would be better!

 

 

 

Seems like an odd thing, as you'd never notice a 1:1 scale caboose stack (I guess you could call that a hack stack?) smoking in most cases...
 
 
Originally Posted by J Daddy:

I make sure all mine are turned off. Had one get really hot and noticed it before it started to melt the sides of the car. Nice for a photo shoot, otherwise make sure they are off.

What's the point, then?

Last edited by p51

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×