Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I like Super O but don’t use it anymore. The biggest drawback I encountered was with loks that had severe overhang while on a curve and entering a switch. My Trainmaster would hit the switch motor cover. This can be remedied by placing a straight section prior to entering the switch. Not a good option if you’re tight on space, which I was.

Steve

Clearly a poor choice by Lionel years ago to not have resurrected Super O for modern layouts with more track options. Still one of the best looking 3 rail track systems out there today!  ScaleTrax came close but the odd tie spacing was probably it's major downfall for those of us who wanted a more prototypical track appearance.

My layout is all Super O and I am very happy with it. The 36” diameter doesn’t bother me as I am not a scale guy; I am fine with postwar steam and Rail King steam which look just fine on 36” diameter curves. It’s saved me a lot of $$$ by not being able to buy scale sized engines. If you do want to run larger engines or 18” or 21” passenger cars,then it would not be a good choice for you. Even the 60’ RailKing passenger cars can look a little awkward on the curves but not too bad.

Mack

@NYC Fan posted:

There were a couple of guys out there who would take two 036 sections of Super O and make it into one 072 section. Looked great. The two problems were it was a costly process and if you wanted Super O switches you were stuck with 036.  

If you join the Super O group you can see photos of how to make larger diameter curves using Super O. Its actually not that difficult but does take patience. Not much harder than bending Gargraves after cutting the ties.



Pete

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×