Originally Posted by RockyMountaineer:
Originally Posted by PC9850:
Originally Posted by RockyMountaineer:
Never quite understood the fascination with these... the 21-inchers, that is.
... and plenty of folks have 72" radius curves.
...
Really??? I'll buy the fact that lots of folks have O-72, but that's not 72" radius. O-72 is 72" diameter. HUGE difference.
21-inch cars would look magnificent on sweeping 6-foot radius curves. But I sincerely doubt too many folks have that kind of real estate except for the true O-scale crowd -- and even at that, we're likely talking club-sized layouts.
Running 21" passenger cars on O-72 curves may be doable, but it's a completely different look than running them on the much broader curves for which they were designed. The 21-inches begin to "look good" around O-96 but their sweet-spot kicks in above O-120+ where the overhang becomes less and less an issue.
Even at $200 a pop, that's a big premium to pay for 21"-incher's: new or used. Someone here on the forum had the beautiful Lionel Texas Special set up for sale at a terrific price a couple of weeks or so, and that's one of the few Lionel 21-inch sets out there -- probably based on K-Line tooling (I surmise). I would have jumped on that set in a heart-beat if it had 18" cars.
David
I'm totally with David on this one...said it several times, various similar threads.
If any of you have any experience with the more popular HO realm, would you say an 18" curve in HO is a 'wide radius'?? When you were modeling in HO, did you buy a set of full-length passenger cars and attempt to run them on your 'wide' 18" radius curves. Try backing that set up around 'wide' 18" radius curves?
Probably not, no, and no. In fact some of the manufacturers of HO cars in the same quality/detail realm of the O-scale K-Line cars put a fine-print caveat on their boxes and in their advertisements...something like "24" radius curves recommended", or "24" radius curves minimum". Gee, that works out to O-96 in O3R parlence.
Like many of the basement empires, I have O72 minimum curves...lots of them. For concentric situations and in some of the accommodating corners I have as wide a curve as O120. As much as I admire the looks and prototypical expanse of the 21" cars, on my layout 15" is the norm, 18" the rare exception re passenger cars.
Although they're not as expansive as the 21"ers, as a train they 'flow' better around all of my curves. Put another way...since this whole hobby is based on huge doses, massive quantities of imagination...my O3R riders are less likely to make a leap into the adjacent drainage ditch when, just as they head for the diner and are leaping betwixt the diaphragms, the train hurtles into a 'wide radius' O72 curve at 'notch 8' on your ZW. There's less clean-up and happier passengers whether sipping soup in the diner, Manhattans in the Obs/Lounge, or seeking relief in the lavatories.
Unfortunately, I...and David...must be in the HUGE MINORITY on this issue. That's 'cuz the makers of benchmark passenger cars...interiors, riders, partitions, LED's, diaphragms, separate grabs, sprung trucks, underbody details, window blinds, etc., etc.,etc., blah, blah, blah...have absolutely NO interest in our 'shorty' segment of the market. Too small, no money, no demand, no lobby, no influence, no future. Besides, we have all the shorties from ages past to work with. The 21"ers have been neglected far too long. Follow the money. So sayeth Lionel, MTH, Atlas, GGD, ...even Bachmann, current stakeholder in the K-Line benchmark tooling.
The shorties will be around with their 2 bulbs casting their ridership as silhouettes on frosted windows for many years to come. That's their market, that's their future. Which is why I also believe there is a sizeable market out there for shorty conversions...adding LED lighting, interiors, ridership, diaphragms, windows with blinds/shades, closer coupling, separate grabs, etc., etc.,etc..
Oh well, TEHO, I say. It's just MHO,...like eveyone else's.
AWHFY?
KD