Skip to main content

With a nod to 'Master 3 Railer' Norm Charbonneau for making this apt comment recently on the Vision Line Hudson thread, Here are two quick photos to illustrate this dilemma.  Years ago when Lionel reintroduced the scale 5340 NYC Hudson based upon the prewar scale 700E Hudson, they included or offered as an add on sale a 'scale sized' pilot with proper sized wheels. Not scale flanges, which are necessary to run on most all track but proper sized wheels themselves. They were plentiful. Lionel again offered a scale pilot for the Commodore Vanderbilt Hudson a few years later. This one small change makes a great difference in appearance of any scale locomotive.   

Here is a handsome Lionel Mohawk with the worst case of Training wheels I've seen yet on a large steamer of this size!  For comparison, the other is a K-Line Hudson from about 2005 with their optional scale pilot which fleshes out the front of this beautiful example of the breed.

I wrote to Dave Olsen last week suggesting that they return to this policy or better yet - have the scale pilot as standard issue and for those (dwindling numbers of) customers who run on 042 or 054 Fastrak, the toy pilot can be optional. I asked what percentage of buyers of the large otherwise beautiful scale locomotives still operate on small radii?   He wrote a nice reply a few days later (Thanks Dave) and said he would speak with Ryan but they had no immediate plans to make available the proper pilot. He admitted that they looked great but that was it...

Come on Lionel; ...and while you're at it - How 'bout produce a few thousand extra good sized pilots for many of your terrific steam locomotives. I'll wager we would buy a LOT of 'em!

Man, they're so diminutive one can hardly see them under there!    While running it's difficultIMG_9989

Ahhh...  a right proper set of wheels to compliment the mighty HudsonIMG_9996

I've had the K-Line with PS2 for about 10 years and have had no tracking difficulties at all on MTH ScaleTrax, Gargraves, or Atlas



*

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_9989
  • IMG_9996
Last edited by c.sam
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I started on my venture months ago. I bought some 36”  2 rail wheelsets with thick axles. These required drilling out the pilots to accept the axles. I was working with a Lionel 10 Wheeler. Yes the wheels are probably the smallest you will see. The fact that they are white walled make them even more noticeable. The scale wheels were the same outside diameter measuring at the flange. They would ride a bit higher up in the chassis but would clear everything. They looked good. The issue was when they went through turnouts. I need 100% reliability and  was more in the 70% range.
Scott Mann hooked me up with 3 axles from some 3 rail pilots. Right size axles even drilled out centers to fit my previously drilled out truck frames. These worked well. Looked much better than stock. I was a happy camper but had many more to do and no more parts.

BF1BB063-116E-450F-B5B5-757B7BC5F79B

My next try was using Lionel freight axles. The newer Lionscale ones with a flat profile wheel. The axles are slight smaller than stock. But close enough to work. All went well till it hit a few spots where you could hear a groan from the wheel flange rubbing the chassis. Off came the truck and I preceded to shave down the flange to eliminate the noise using a drill press and file. I only did the lead axle. The noise was gone and all seemed well till it went through a turnout in the engine yard area. It climbed the rails every time. A stronger spring may have worked.

I purchased pilot trucks at the half price sale for these experiments. This past sale I stumbled on this truck. From a GS4. I believe the wheel face is around 33 scale inches. I never got around to measuring it. But it noticeably larger.

FDE45135-A4D9-498A-94CC-DA616EA5D58E
This truck was tried on 3 models that all share the same pilot casting. The arm itself had to be swapped over with the stock version to get it positioned in the proper spot. A 10 Wheeler, L2a Mohawk and a Weaver die cast Pacific. Two failed with a rubbing issue. The Pacific never made it to a curve. It lifted the chassis enough to give it a wheel slip feature without pushing any buttons on the remote.
I don’t give up easily but sort of threw the towel in on these for now as I have to many other projects going on. The oversize flanges rubbing or not clearing seem to be the big issue on most models. The ones I got from Scott look really good and function with no issues. Just could use many more of them. The 2 rail wheelsets I may revisit. Thinking maybe a stronger spring may give it a little more downforce going through turnouts. The other thing to consider if you start swapping in larger wheels. The brake gear no longer fits. On the 10 Wheeler. I had to file down the brake shoes themselves to pretty much there limit before the inspectors would side line it. The larger wheels do look nice and make it look more like a scale model. I don’t consider my layout to be to complicated and it features decent size curves. Other than operating error. Every engine has to be 100% reliable as far as derailments and the ability to go any route.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • BF1BB063-116E-450F-B5B5-757B7BC5F79B
  • FDE45135-A4D9-498A-94CC-DA616EA5D58E

Here’s some teasers, ….I’ll show more tonight, as I’m a bit busy at work,…..but if your track work can stomach 2 rail scale wheel sets, that’s the way to go……as far as traversing switches, etc, …I stole the playbook from Jack ( Hotwater ) and put some thin strips of brass in the gaps to give the wheel set flanges a place to ride,…..doesn’t affect three rail flanges, ……

Pat IMG_7639IMG_7641IMG_7642IMG_7635IMG_7643IMG_7644IMG_7645IMG_7648IMG_7649IMG_8524IMG_8163IMG_8425IMG_8488

Attachments

Images (13)
  • IMG_7639
  • IMG_7641
  • IMG_7642
  • IMG_7635
  • IMG_7643
  • IMG_7644
  • IMG_7645
  • IMG_7648
  • IMG_7649
  • IMG_8524
  • IMG_8163
  • IMG_8425
  • IMG_8488

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×