Skip to main content

When it came to beauty, not all steam locomotives were created equal. It so happens that I have the two ugliest streamline steamers on my railroad, the NYC's Commodore Vanderbilt, and the C&O's Yellow Belly. I do not have the streamlined Pennsy K4, or the Reading's Crusader yet, but these would also be in the ugly category.

 

As for the most beautiful steamers, the Dreyfus Hudsons and the N&W K & J Classes are at the top of my list.

 

It's ironic that the New York Central had the most beautiful steamers, the Class J Hudsons, and the ugliest steamers which were also Hudsons, the Commodore Vanderbilt and the Mercury. It's amusing to me that I see beauty in most all non-streamlined steamers, but the earliest attempts at streamlining steamers made them ugly!!!

 

As for diesels, the early hood units had style and were beautiful, but after those......UGLY Boxes! Only a mother could love the BL-2, the ugliest diesel in my opinion.

 

What say you all?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Bobby Ogage:

When it came to beauty, not all steam locomotives were created equal. It so happens that I have the two ugliest streamline steamers on my railroad, the NYC's Commodore Vanderbilt, and the C&O's Yellow Belly. I do not have the streamlined Pennsy K4, or the Reading's Crusader yet, but these would also be in the ugly category.

 

 

 

What say you all?

The PRR had 2 streamlined K4 designs. One engine had the most famous, the Loewy design (which I don't like), and 4 had a PRR in-house design that I feel was quite handsome (only made by Williams brass in the 1980s). This design pulled other Blue Ribbon PRR trains while the Loewy one pulled the Broadway Limited.

Originally Posted by Frank Mulligan:
I disagree with you on the C&O yellow belly. If MTH ever makes a Premier version I'm in. And I'm not even a C&O fan

I have the most recent Railking version, produced in 2006 or so with PS2 of the Yellowbelly. One of my more favorite engines in my collection perhaps because I've seen the real one so many times and have always liked the real one. My engine has it quirks, such as finding every dip and imperfection in the track and letting you know about it. Regardless, after comparing and photographing the model with the prototype, from what I can remember, it is very close to being spot on. Only major thing is there are two extra drive rods (eccentric rods are what I think they are called). Oh yea...and the lead truck is black, not grey like the real 490 currently is but that can easily be changed. 

The Commodore Vanderbilt looks like an armadillo to me. And the C&O yellow streamlined loco absolutely defines fugly. I have to agree that most of the streamlined steamers were not very good looking. But the streamlined diesels were almost all very appealing. So much more so than the utilitarian-like boxes on wheels we have to look at today.

Originally Posted by Bobby Ogage:

 It's amusing to me that I see beauty in most all non-streamlined steamers,

 

I can't agree with you more on this statement. The only streamliner I really care for at all is the N&W J, however I'd probably still like it better "unshrouded". Members will hunt me down for this, but to me, SP 4449 is one of the ugliest northerns ever made.I'll take 844 or 3751 any day, but those "orange fenders"  and that ugly nose do nothing for me.

"...It's ironic that the New York Central had the most beautiful steamers, the Class J Hudsons, and the ugliest steamers which were also Hudsons, the Commodore Vanderbilt and the Mercury."

 

I believe the Mercury locomotives that you are referring to were Pacifics. The Hudson's, later used on the Mercury, were streamlined in the Dreyfuss/Empire State style.

 

 

   

 

Pacific Locomotive in Mercury Service

Mercury

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Mercury
Last edited by NYC Fan
Originally Posted by Norton:

Ugly=camelbacks, any engine with a wootten firebox like Reading, D&H. The 4-8-4 woottens are passable due to the better proportion of firebox to boiler but still at bottom compared to other Northerns.

 

Pete

 

Wooten firebox

 

D&H

 

BEAUTIFUL!


The most powerful Pacific ever, TE 64000 pounds.


This picture was posted the old way, pasted link to

PhotoBucket.  It still works!

Last edited by zhyachts

I will agree on the CF7, in all three of its cab styles.

 

I'm loyal to the Home Road, but these were Frankensteins in appearance and creature comfort.  Built on a cheap budget.

 

On the Coast Lines we called them "Lou's Garage jobs."  Lou's Garage advertised a complete engine overhaul for $69.95 (6-cylinder) or $89.95 (8-cylinder) in the late 1950's.  They used the cheapest parts and cheap labor.

As diesels go - the BL-2 just looks ridiculous. 

 

I like wooten fireboxes, largely because I grew up in Reading PA.  I personally don't care for the look of Belpaire fireboxes. Round boilers should not be square!!

 

That abomination pennsyk4 posted is so confusing that I can't even find the boiler under all the connections!!

 

Otherwise I think the Chapelon inspired French Pacifics are hideous - but I'd love to have one

I'll post these scans so you can show what your explaining,  I myself like the Loewy designed K-4.Originally Posted by Joe Hohmann:
Originally Posted by Bobby Ogage:

When it came to beauty, not all steam locomotives were created equal. It so happens that I have the two ugliest streamline steamers on my railroad, the NYC's Commodore Vanderbilt, and the C&O's Yellow Belly. I do not have the streamlined Pennsy K4, or the Reading's Crusader yet, but these would also be in the ugly category.

 

 

 

What say you all?

The PRR had 2 streamlined K4 designs. One engine had the most famous, the Loewy design (which I don't like), and 4 had a PRR in-house design that I feel was quite handsome (only made by Williams brass in the 1980s). This design pulled other Blue Ribbon PRR trains while the Loewy one pulled the Broadway Limited.

 

IMG_0047

IMG_0048

IMG_0051

Attachments

Images (3)
  • IMG_0047: K-4 3768
  • IMG_0048: K-4 3678
  • IMG_0051: K-4 5338

Except in drastic instances like the BL-2 and experimental oddballs, I personally rarely ever think of a locomotive as ugly. To me they're all just interesting machines.

 

I am also surprised to see all the knocks the Commodore Vanderbilt is getting here. I think the correct gunmetal gray scheme is very handsome, especially with all the classy white trim.

 

 

About the only ugly thing the Central ever did in my mind was to let their streamliners fall into disrepair:

 

Last edited by PC9850
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×