Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@GG1 4877 posted:

Definitely Auburn / Kusan.  The basic tooling was picked up by K-line and then O-Line although with more modern motors and electronics.  Fun little cars even if they do scale out to a bit over 2/3 the length of a scale RDC.

Just for my own information, but I always thought that the K-Line (later the RMT Buddy) was derived from the MARX tooling, although K-Line did utilize former tooling from both companies. For example, the S-2 switcher was from the MARX tooling but their standard Classic caboose was from the Kusan K-series.

Though the RDC's all look pretty similar (using the photo links posted by @ADCX Rob for the Kusan version) the MARX version has the suggested fuel tank as part of the main body shell, along with the front and rear steps. The Kusan-Auburn version has the fuel tank attached to the frame, and it also appears that the front and rear steps are also attached to the frame.

Just for my own information, but I always thought that the K-Line (later the RMT Buddy) was derived from the MARX tooling, although K-Line did utilize former tooling from both companies. For example, the S-2 switcher was from the MARX tooling but their standard Classic caboose was from the Kusan K-series.

Though the RDC's all look pretty similar (using the photo links posted by @ADCX Rob for the Kusan version) the MARX version has the suggested fuel tank as part of the main body shell, along with the front and rear steps. The Kusan-Auburn version has the fuel tank attached to the frame, and it also appears that the front and rear steps are also attached to the frame.

I stand corrected.  Just did some research.  Indeed, the K-Line / O-Line tooling came from Marx and not AMT / KMT.  Interesting.  More research is in order here!

@Roy O posted:

It appears mr publisher, you dont check your statements. The RDC shown above is a Auburn-kusan RDC that is a 3 Rail. How did you come up with 2 rail? You of all people should get it right!   Roy

Well "Mr. Roy O"....it appears you didn't read what I said above.  I never said it was 2-rail...so how did you come up with me saying it was 2-rail?  No need to respond however your comment was kind of snarky.

@Roy O posted:

Thank you for all the replies.  The editor sent me a note I made a incorrect listing. That this RDC was a 2 rail and was to be sent to the 2 rail forum. End      PS some kind person sent me photos to verify it was a Auburn-Kusan other RDC made by same had road names.   Roy

No Editor on this board sent you an email about moving this to 2-rail...period.  Next time, contact me directly if you have a problem with us moving your threads.  Only I would contact you about such situations so you are mistaken or confused.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×