Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Len2:
Originally Posted by TheTrainMaster:
Hmm looks like i may want to invest in Kadee couplers for my cars. I wonder if they will work with the Atlas cars?

Atlas cars are easy, they already have the holes in place to body mount Kadees.

Well, not really. The holes provided in the Atlas cars are for mounting their own design coupler and gear box. Thus, using those same holes for mounting a Kadee, it then sticks out noticeably past the end-sill of the car. 

Originally Posted by Jhainer:
Originally Posted by clem k:
Originally Posted by Jhainer:

kadees are new to me I picked up 13 weaver 50 ft boxcars all with 2 rail wheels and kadees I can switch out the wheels to 3 rail wheels.  but then still have the kadee's now my question is to loose the kadees I would have to buy all new trucks for all 13 cars. could get expensive or swap out the wheel sets cheaper. but I have 031 curves is there a way to make the kadees work on 031 I tested a little and it seems the body's of the cars touch

Hello Jhainer

 

What trucks came on the cars you purchased?  I can supply you with new wheels,axles,couplers or trucks. I bulk purchased a bunch of stuff at Weaver sale, more than I can use! 2rail-3rail and metal and Delrin wheels.

 

Clem 

Not sure here is the one I switched out wheels too from an 027 car I had laying around .

 

20150724_121757[1]

Jhainer…I sent you an email

Great thread...I've learned a lot from it and am now giving some serious thought to purchasing a few pair of the newer 740-series Kadee's just to give them a try.

 

Would some of the "3-rail scale" Kadee users here share their thoughts/preferences on metal (#740) versus plastic (#745) draft gear boxes for body mounting the couplers on cars with 3-rail trucks/wheelsets?  The price is the same on the Kadee website.

 

I tend to believe "metal is better", but is that the case here?  Why would someone prefer plastic?  Are there operational differences between the two?  What about longevity?

Last edited by CNJ #1601

"I tend to believe "metal is better", but is that the case here?  Why would someone prefer plastic?  Are there operational differences between the two?  What about longevity?"

 

    The only place I'd use plastic kadees is on metal framed cars where there might be a shorting problem if the wheels sets are mis-aligned. The metal Kadees have a much better feel and are probably stronger (though I've never broken a plastic one) It's possible to mix metal couplers with plastic draft gear and plastic couplers in metal draft gear btw to double the insulated pairs)......DaveB

Originally Posted by joeyA:

Great thread...I've learned a lot from it and am now giving some serious thought to purchasing a few pair of the newer 740-series Kadee's just to give them a try.

 

Would some of the "3-rail scale" Kadee users here share their thoughts/preferences on metal (#740) versus plastic (#745) draft gear boxes for body mounting the couplers on cars with 3-rail trucks/wheelsets?  The price is the same on the Kadee website.

 

I tend to believe "metal is better", but is that the case here?  Why would someone prefer plastic?  Are there operational differences between the two?  What about longevity?

Joey,

Between plastic or metal there is not quality difference.

Plastic are commonly used to isolated brass cars, because in some cases the cars are polarized, except if you use plastic trucks or double isolated wheels. Back to the topic I start changing kadee couples and finishing changing rails too, so be careful the 2 rail bug sometimes bite hard.

Andre. 

Last edited by AG
Originally Posted by joeyA:

Great thread...I've learned a lot from it and am now giving some serious thought to purchasing a few pair of the newer 740-series Kadee's just to give them a try.

 

Would some of the "3-rail scale" Kadee users here share their thoughts/preferences on metal (#740) versus plastic (#745) draft gear boxes for body mounting the couplers on cars with 3-rail trucks/wheelsets?  The price is the same on the Kadee website.

 

I have never liked the "plastic" coupler, mainly because I prefer the metallic sound the metal couplers make when the slack runs-out, starting a train. That said, I found with the #745 "plastic" gear box, when tightening the center mounting screws down tight, the "plastic" gear box tended to deform slightly, which tended to restrict smooth side-to-side movement of the coupler. Since I had inadvertently purchased the #745, instead of the #740, I simply requested/purchased about 15 metal gear box assemblies, so I didn't have to use anymore "plastic" gear boxes. 

 

I tend to believe "metal is better", but is that the case here?  Why would someone prefer plastic?

 

As mentioned above, cars with metal frames, metal trucks, and metal wheels might tend to "electrify" the under frame and short out to the next car. This problem is particularly prevalent in 2-Rail equipment, where the rails are always hot with DC power.

 

  Are there operational differences between the two? 

 

I've not experienced any.

 

What about longevity?

 

Should be the same, as Kadee makes an excellent product, and has since about the mid 1950s.

 

Originally Posted by servoguy:

Did any of you guys that are complaining about "lobster claw" couplers coming uncoupled by themselves read my post about fixing this problem?  The fix is simple and quick, less than 5 seconds per coupler.  Once the couplers are modified, they do not come open by themselves.  

I must have missed it. Can you provide a link to your post?

Kadee has an electric magnetic uncoupling mechanism.  I have a few somewhere, however, I just use the standard between the rail magnets glued in at 43 normal locations and a long thin screwdriver and twist the couplers everywhere else. 

I have never used Kadee's two piece split three rail magnets.  I would be interested to know if Kadee's split 3r magnets refer magnetism to the center steel rail??

A long small flat screwdriver is kinda a de facto standard by many folks locally.

Kadees are very dependable.

Tom Tee posted:

Kadee has an electric magnetic uncoupling mechanism.  I have a few somewhere, however, I just use the standard between the rail magnets glued in at 43 normal locations and a long thin screwdriver and twist the couplers everywhere else. 

I have never used Kadee's two piece split three rail magnets.  I would be interested to know if Kadee's split 3r magnets refer magnetism to the center steel rail??

A long small flat screwdriver is kinda a de facto standard by many folks locally.

Kadees are very dependable.

So ur kaydees will uncouple if parkednover magnets?

Jamos posted:

So ur kaydees will uncouple if parkednover magnets?

The magnet will attract the trip pin (the simulated air hose) hanging under the coupler, and pull the coupler head off center. Since the typical Kadee (correct spelling) depends on a raised lip on the car-facing surface of its knuckle to stay coupled under tension (pulling forces), simply backing up slightly while over the magnet will allow the couplers to move sideways and disengage.

---PCJ

Last edited by RailRide
RailRide posted:
Jamos posted:

So ur kaydees will uncouple if parkednover magnets?

The magnet will attract the trip pin (the simulated air hose) hanging under the coupler, and pull the coupler head off center. Since the typical Kadee (correct spelling) depends on a raised lip on the car-facing surface of its knuckle to stay coupled under tension (pulling forces), simply backing up slightly while over the magnet will allow the couplers to move sideways and disengage.

---PCJ

Okay so that works just like the bachmann couplers with magnets

Martin H posted:
Lionel O27 track is different from regular lionel tubular track.  I believe o27 was introduced after as a more economical track system.
 
Lionel Tubular Track:
1) black ties
2) straights are 10"
3) ties are higher profile.
4) minimum available curve is 31"
 
Lionel O27 tubular Track
1) brown ties
2) straights are about 8.75" 
3) ties are lower profile
4) minimum available curve is 27"
 
This isn't something I read somewhere.  I own all the above mentioned examples and have measured them myself.
 
Originally Posted by tr18:

 

Lionel 027 track is NOT 42" diameter

 

They were talking about O27 profile track, I believe Lionel made other sizes in that profile (as opposed to traditional Lionel tinplate track), and K line did as well. O27 track has small ties, the rail profile is smaller and to me actually looks more prototypical (if you add ties to O27 track, and weather it, doesn't look half bad).  

Big Jim posted:
Originally Posted by servoguy:

Did any of you guys that are complaining about "lobster claw" couplers coming uncoupled by themselves read my post about fixing this problem?  The fix is simple and quick, less than 5 seconds per coupler.  Once the couplers are modified, they do not come open by themselves.  

I must have missed it. Can you provide a link to your post?

There is no fixing those oversized, ugly, clunking, lobster claws.  I’ve run trains with 70 cars.  Can’t do that with claws fix or no fix and has Hot Water stated there’s nothing better that the run out slack when you start a train.

Jamos posted:
clem k posted:

I use the three rail magnets, they work great when installed properly .  And you can get tricky and install them where you normally wouldn't, or without cutting ties.  

Any videos of how to do this thanks

Really don't need a video. For normal installation just go by the directions included with the magnets. The thing is, to go exactly by Kadee directions for the couplers and the magnets. Don't be sloppy with your work and don't ever say good enough.  And the older style coupler #805 work better than the new 700 series. The  oxide red Delrin couplers      IMO operate the best, easier to see and the plastic is lighter and more slippery, However some people think their to weak. I only broke one, I let the slack get me. I use the metal #805 now, but the majority is the 700 series. I have some  installations using single magnet on top of ties with booster super magnets.  Even installed on turnout.  I admit there was trial and error until I got it just right.  Like HOT said laidoffsick has the best videos.

 

IMG_7725IMG_7726IMG_7727  

 

Attachments

Images (3)
  • IMG_7725
  • IMG_7726
  • IMG_7727
Jamos posted:

Using a screwdriver to decouple kinda kills the realism hehe

Not really when you think about it.  I walk (or rather use to*), in order to hand throw the turnouts.  So no big deal to manually uncouple the cars.  Manual uncoupling is actually very realistic.

*going through some foot problems again.

Tom Tee posted:
Jamos posted:

Using a screwdriver to decouple kinda kills the realism hehe

Not really when you think about it.  I walk (or rather use to*), in order to hand throw the turnouts.  So no big deal to manually uncouple the cars.  Manual uncoupling is actually very realistic.

*going through some foot problems again.

Right.  I can't think of any prototype equipment that uses track magnets or electrocouplers for uncoupling.

Rusty

Dominic Mazoch posted:

K-Line did sell a few 4 car sets with one car as a claw-Kadee, the rest Kadees.  Ore cars, I think.  Truck mounted Kadees, I believe.  Do not know if the Kadees were at the same height as body mounted.  Or if they wete true Kadees....

At some point in time (I guess when the patent ran out) K-Line was selling their own version of a Kadee coupler. I still have some. They were basically the same as a Kadee but the K-Line version was die cast and I believe the coupler box was slightly larger than the Kadee coupler box. It was pretty much a Kadee knockoff. K-Line actually sold a few 2 rail cars with their coupler installed on them. I have one new in the box. 

Tom Tee posted:
Jamos posted:

Using a screwdriver to decouple kinda kills the realism hehe

Not really when you think about it.  I walk (or rather use to*), in order to hand throw the turnouts.  So no big deal to manually uncouple the cars.  Manual uncoupling is actually very realistic.

*going through some foot problems again.

So basically no magnets are cool just use a small  screwdriver like a rail operator would have to. How does this work with the auto decoplers  on the mth engines?

Jamos posted:
Tom Tee posted:
Jamos posted:

Using a screwdriver to decouple kinda kills the realism hehe

Not really when you think about it.  I walk (or rather use to*), in order to hand throw the turnouts.  So no big deal to manually uncouple the cars.  Manual uncoupling is actually very realistic.

*going through some foot problems again.

So basically no magnets are cool just use a small  screwdriver like a rail operator would have to.

Personally, I always preferred wood "chop-sticks" with the point slightly sharpened in a pencil sharpener. I personally NOT recommend using a small metal screwdriver, incase you slip and touch the center rail, while also engaging the metal Kadee coupler.

How does this work with the auto decoplers  on the mth engines?

What are "auto decoplers"? If you mean the MTH "Electro-Coupler", then yes, then generally couple pretty well with the Kadee 805 series couplers. However, most "Electro-Couplers" and lobster claw couplers will NOT couple with the latest, improved, Kadee 740 series couplers.

 

I'm not sure about 3 rail but several close 2-railer friends of mine are using powerful magnets buried in ballast so the uncoupling magnets can't be seen. I like that they work for any Kadee equipped car, not just uncoupling the engine.

Since many like their couplers so big, I'm wondering if they could use G scale Kadee couplers to get better reliability with them instead of using rubber bands or super glue to keep the knuckles from opening on their equipment in long trains.

Last edited by christopher N&W

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×