I'm referring to whether you'd like seeing Lionel's TMMC / Legacy system have a capability similar to MTH's DCS where you could easily identify and verify the amount of time a train's been powered up and the scale distance run? Such a feature would not only be personally helpful in establishing needed maintenace on engines but hopefully also be a deterent to those sellers inclined to claim their engines have minimal runtime when in actuality nothing could be further from the truth. After having my faith in sellers of trains occasionally tarnished by their "stretching of the truth" regarding the extent to which they've run their FS gems, I'll admit I wish the veracity of usage of Lionel command engines could be verified as it can be with MTH engines. Your comments on this idea are most welcomed.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I don't.
The MTH odometer and power timer can be deceptive. Operators with new engines have reported readings that do not represent a "test run". Unless this has improved.
Maintenance is easy enough to track.
Since TMCC is a one-way system, this is pretty much a pipe dream with the current generation. It's possible with the IR track sensor it could be done for Legacy systems from 2012 and onward, but I'm not holding my breath.
I see no need for it. The mileage in MTH units tell me nothing because I don't think they are that accurate.
I would rather see Lionel spend their time and money elsewhere.
Features I have available, but have never made use of because I just don't see much value in them as they relate to my operating needs or desires.
No, I'm fine as is, but I won't stand in the way of people who want it. Nice feature for some, I suppose.
Nope. Not by any means a reliable indicator in all cases, as Marty mentioned.
There may be less of this in more recent models (maybe P3 fixed it - I don't have enough P3 yet to consider it a decent sample size), but I had at least 2 or 3 P2 engines that decided to erratically bump the mileage to an unrealistic number. (once it was something like 29,000 miles in 6 hours (hours were roughly accurate), which even when correcting for scale miles vs. real miles is almost the speed of a car on the highway to get that many miles in that many hours). (No, I did not do the calculation precisely - if anyone cares to, please have at it. Point is the case described was not physically realizable)
A neat idea(and I agree it's nice when it does function right), but not the foolproof indicator many make it out to be.
-Dave
Marty,
The MTH odometer and power timer can be deceptive. Operators with new engines have reported readings that do not represent a "test run". Unless this has improved.
That's pretty much history.
David,
I see no need for it. The mileage in MTH units tell me nothing because I don't think they are that accurate.
If that's what you think, then you'd be mistaken.
The speed, chronometer and mileage driven in a PS2 or PS3 engine in good working condition are quite accurate.
You may right Barry but I have had a few MTH engines that I know the mileage kept on jumping When only running briefly. Could have been a glitch on those units, who knows.
I like the feature. Only had one that miles was way off but the time was correct. Helps me even out the run time on duplicate power units and maintenance. Wish it would measure in feet and inches. Then I would know how long siding's and hidden curved passing tracks are and length of blocks.