Skip to main content

I remarked in my brief review of my new ZW-L last week that it ran locomotives, conventionally, much slower than any other power supply I have ever used.  I posted details included videos and such but breifly, it seemed to run conventional locos, smoothly at about 60% of the slowest speed a Z4000 or CW-80 would run them smoothly, and Legacy and Premier locos (those with cruise) at about 50% of less.

 

I tested it today versus the others on standard Superstreets vehicles.  the ZW-L can "beat" all other supplies I have in slow speed tests with standard 'Streets vehciles, but not by nearly as much as with locos. 

 

During this test, I noticed that the newer Bachman vehciles, which have normal (spring loaded) center pickups, just run much better period, than the K-Line-by-Lionel with those itsy-bitsy spring-steel arm center pickups.  (The original K-line vehciles in the early 200s also had those - they just work better.  I tested a Bachmann for the slowest speed if would run smoothly - without a trace of hesitation or stumbling.

Slowest scale speed - mph

CW-80   - 26 mph

Z4000    - 25

TechIII* - 19

ZW-L      - 18

* the TechIII is an old DC power supply for HO and N gauage that sends 16 volt chopped DC to the track, with the duty cycle varied to increase or decrease power output. Standard 'streets vehciles have a foll wave recitifer so they run just the same on AC or DC.

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I doubt it could be done easily, cleanly, and durably.  The K-Line by Lionel units with the spring-steel center contact arm have a post cast into them fopr mounting of those special cnnectors, and wiring made for those connectors.  It would be possible, though - a lot of work. 

 

Below: three "generations" of the 'Streets Ford panel van.

right: Very early K-line model, cast metal chassis, ugly wheels, has an e-unit with F-only switch, very good center contact rollers in recessed mounts with vertical springs.  Same motor and axles as in the others, though.

Middle: K-Line by Lionel from about the last your they were offered.  Plastic chassis, spring steel arm, "itsy bitsy" center rollers, nicer wheels.

Right: Bachman: plastic chassis, nicer wheels, good center rollers withlever action springs.

Slide1

Slide2

Slide 3

Attachments

Images (3)
  • Slide1
  • Slide2
  • Slide 3

Lee;

I know there is very little space in those vans, but have you considered adding a set of dropping diodes in line to the motor? I suspect you can use a much lower wattage and thus smaller diode than we use in Train engines.

 

After reading what I posted on the forum, it occurred to me that the transformers used can't be properly loaded by just the 'streets vans. Have you tried running the power to a short track with a Train on it or a big light to load the power down a bit?

Many power supplies do not regulate well until properly loaded.

Russell you make all good points. Taking the last point, I ran three 'Streets vehciles at once in the test, but that was still only about 10 watts so it was not really exercising or loading the ZW-L - only 5% of the maximum rating of one output and less than 2% of the units capability.  Probably did not load it enough. 

 

There is room inside all except the K-line version (it has an e-board inside) to easily install dropping diodes.   But I use a different approach in an all my 'Streets vehicles, I remove the full wave rectifier and wire them direct, then use a chopped DC, variable duty cycle power supply like the TechIII.  This has two advantages - 16 volts all the time which reduces electrical connectivity problems with those tiny and few pickup points, and you can back up the vehicle by reversing polarity.  I expected the result I got, by the way, which is that the ZW-L would do a tiny bit better, because it think its sending out 18V rather than 16, again with a type of "variable duty cycle." 

 

With the high (16 or 18) voltage and the variable duty cycle, either the TechIII or the ZW-L do a fair job of making the vehicles run fairly smoothly at fairly slow speeds - they do much better than pure sine wave (I've tried them on an old Marx pure AC unit) and slightly better than on a CW-80 or the Z4000 (not a dramatic but its a noticeable difference).  The real problem with either the TechIII or the ZW-L, at really low speeds, is the 'Streets motor.  If the things had a flywheel they would run som much more smoothly at really low RPMS - those two units will turn the motors very slowly, but without a flywheel they stagger and run unevenly just a bit - annoying.  All my best running locos have flywheels.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×