Skip to main content

Ok, got this great early 10-1060 MTH 400e at york. Finally ripped up the old layout and laid down the std track. BUT, it seems the 400e and tender don't particulary care for the std 42 curve pieces.  Question, is 54 track the minimun to prevent binding in the pic, or is 72 the min?

Thanks,

Mr_P

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Check wheel gauges and tracks gauge for being uniform.

  Check train in curves facing both directions too. If something is off center the other direction should not bind.

   Find what limits your trailing truck, maybe trim it? It won't take much from what I see.

  Is that pictures track "straight-curve-straight" ? Two curves in a row, it would likely have more binding. 

Thanks for the helpful ideas, I will check on what you guys have mentioned.  I think the problem appears to be an S curve in the layout. I'll try to redo it without the S part and see what happens.  Incidentaly, I purchased some new straight track from a well-know tinplate dealer, 6 sections and 3 of them had dead shorts from the center rail being crimped too tight.  Waiting for a response, if they will send me 3 more sections, so I'll have to wait to get them and try it again. 

Next time I think I'll contact USA track instead...

An es (s) curve! That could do it.

   I usually only think of that being an issue for reversing small gauges while switching; but do have a few O goodies that bind in an es only, and not in a regular curve.

  If that's the case, adjusting by use of curves, or even half curves, with straights between(full or short), might  give you an es it can handle.

Hi Jim, the tender is getting pulled off of the tracks, presumably from the draw bar being yanked to the side.  I tried to slow the engine down to get a better view of whats happening, but it was kinda hard and I didn't want the circuit break to trip.... again.....  Because I had the issue with 3 sections having dead shorts, I can't run it around the track, just ran it around the 72 curve and then into the "es" section where it rocked the tender back and forth.  At the other end is a 42 curve, which I hope will be fine once I remove the "ES" section and use some more 72 sections and straights.

Thanks, Mr_P

  It's so close to not binding, I'm willing to bet it's only binding from the es's curves.

   At the curves transition, the change in direction at the front of the loco,  changes the outside overhang at the cab, from the normal "outside" half position over the center rail, to the inside half, opposite of where it normally lies, during a normal curve, hence the bind, derail on the rear truck, or pulling the tenders lead truck into a derail. A short straight between the es's curves often eliminates the issue, unless severe.

   Maybe someone has 2 extra 42" curves, to test that theory on their loco? At 42" I think even USA track may have the same bind.

 (Es was one of my elementary school's teacher's pet peeves. Just because I thought of her, I used it; folks actually, rarely use it at all anymore )

Last edited by Adriatic

Well, I tested the engine thru a 42 curve and it seems fine.  Also ordered some track from USA to replace the defective ones i got.  No word from the dealer who sold me them.  I'll have to call him on Wednesday, since they're only open from Wed thru Sat. I'll post some pics once I get the track finished.

Thanks to all for you support,

Mr_P

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×