Skip to main content

Hello Everyone!

I have a newbie question about the practice of adding weight to rolling stock. Since there are many  inconsistencies between car types and manufacturers as well, it seems like a great idea. I have a kitchen scale, and randomly weighing different cars I have, they do vary from a little to a lot. Along with adjusting the coupler heights to all be the same, I want to be able to reliably run any consist I configure to run without issue. I know this topic has been covered before, but my particular question was never addressed, or at least I didn't find it, so here goes. 

I've accumulated about 50 pieces of rolling stock, but don't yet have a layout. I'm hoping to buy the track I need and to build the benchwork sometime next spring or summer, but until then, I have time to get all my cars in shape.

The NMRA has specific guidelines about this practice. They specify the initial weight of five ounces and then adding one ounce per inch of car length. Let's take a 10" gondola, for example. It needs the first five ounces, plus another another 10 ounces? But if the car initially weighs ten ounces, I don't need to add any more weight, right?

OK, if needed, where's the best place to put the additional weight? In my case, I plan on using stick-on wheel weights because I was in the auto business all my life, and it seems like they'd work well. Obviously, putting them on the chassis is easiest, but do I put the weights in front of the trucks, behind the trucks, or in the middle? I'd think that evenly distributing the weight is the way to go.

Thanks for any help and guidance you can provide. I appreciate it. Happy New Year to all!

Tom

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The guideline is 5oz and one oz per inch.  So, your 10" car should weigh 15oz.  Obviously, that's just a guideline, but if you get all of the cars somewhere near the NMRA weight standard, you'll normally have better results.  One issue is when the car weighs too much, not much you can usually do about that.

For locomotives, I like to add as much weight as possible. Unless you get ridiculous, adding weight to a locomotive almost always translates to better traction and stable running.

Here I took a shot at adding weight to this HHP-8.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

For house cars and tank cars where you can get inside the tank, I fill a baggie with old nuts, bolts, screws, etc. while it's on the scale with the car. I mean, who uses wood screws any more? Same for hopper cars with a fake load on top. For flat cars, I glued flat steel bar under the car deck; also used flat steel inside a plastic tender body. For one gondola in my work train, the steel went inside the body with a load of ties on top. Never had a passenger car underweight yet. For unloaded open hoppers, I used cars that already met the NMRA standard empty. This included die-cast cars, but also several plastic ones. I've also used loads to weight hoppers--my limestone loads are cat litter, suitably lower in the car since the stone was more dense than coal. I have not worried about specific placement of any added weight, as long as it's between the trucks.

I follow the same NMRA formula.  Since I also race and build RC model sailboats which use poured epoxy and lead shot for the keels, I have used #9 shot bound with 50/50 white glue and water in hoppers, painted flat black, then covered with whatever "load" I am simulating- like coal, or ballast.

I use sticky-back wheel balancing weights bought at the automotive parts store for box cars, and flat cars.

I have been concerned about the weight of cars when running a diesel loco with a marginal motor- like a LC Plus.  And far better are ones with dual motors.  So I run my Legacy F Units with a powered A, and a powered B , then an unpowered A lash up.  I run from 15-25 cars.

I never thought about weighting locos though.

Last edited by Mike Wyatt
@Ken Wing posted:

@gunrunnerjohn people used to be concerned about excess loco weight exceeding motor current capacity. Do you measure motor amps when adding weight?

Nope, seat of the pants.  For the HHP-8, it only weighed 4 pounds, with two Mabuchi RS-385 motors, there's no risk of exceeding the motor capacity.  Adding the weight made a huge difference in pulling power, I was amazed what a little over an extra pound did for it.

Honestly, I've seen factory installations of one Mabuchi RS-385 motor in steamers that weighed 7-8 pounds and were hauling around a diecast tender, so IMO it would be hard to overload a diesel/electric with two motors with an extra pound or two of weight.

This topic came up a while back. For my medium sized layout with limited freight operations, I use 1 oz. wheel weights from Amazon placed on each end of the car. Be careful not to put it right over the  screw holding the trucks in place. An extra ounce on each end is all my light weight boxcars need to back into a siding with no derailments. For cars that need more weight, just put 2 on each end. With the adhesive backing, it's easy peasy.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1

The NMRA recommendation is total car weight, not just added weight.

My experience is that good rolling wheels with smooth treads is equally as important as weight,   Some very light weights are exceptions to this.    But I have found if the cars roll easily and the wheels adjust to curves by sliding slightly as the prototype does, a wide variety of weights can be mixed.    I have a bunch of Weaver covered hoppers which are fairly light, and I can generally mix them in a train of Atlas boxcars which are fairly heavy, and they run well with not derailments or string lining.    I do  use body mount couplers which probably helps tracking too.

I primarily run small diesels and small locomotives.  And, most of my boxcars are about 10 inches.

So, even though the official standards indicate that these cars should weigh 15 ounces (let's round that up to a pound), I can't image my small engines being able to haul 7 or 8 cars (7 to 8 pounds) of weight, plus caboose, for very long without burning them out.  My scale 44-tonner from Williams has two good motors, so maybe it could handle the weight, but I doubt the others (such as my Lionel Dockside switcher) would last long.

I just heavily weight the first car behind the engine, so that the stiff coupler on the back of the engines doesn't derail the first car, and leave the rest of the cars as-is.   I really don't have much problem backing them up, as long as a go slowly.

Mannyrock

Putting weight on locomotives is often worth time, effort and weights as it often will increase pulling power.  Weighting down cars is not done around here unless there is a reason.  A time or two a light weight car seamed to get pulled off the 027 tracks on a curve, with too many or heavier cars behind the light car.  It that case, I moved the light car to the rear of the train.

If it is not broken, don't fix it.

Charlie

Last edited by Choo Choo Charlie

Putting weight on locomotives is often worth time, effort and weights as it often will increase pulling power.  Weighting down cars is not done around here unless there is a reason.  A time or two a light weight car seamed to get pulled off the 027 tracks on a curve ,with too many or heavier cars behind the light car.  It that case, I moved the light car to the rear of the train.

If it is not broken, don't fix it.

Charlie

True, Charlie. Weighting down cars could put a drag on the engine with more weight to pull. However, when my grandkids are switching cars, sometimes a heavier car, like an operating milk car, can derail the lighter weight car in front of it as it's being pushed back in front of its platform on a siding. We don't keep track of the proper order in a consist, of heavier cars being at the head end and lighter cars at the tail end.

In the photo below, the rear truck of the Union Pacific double door would sometimes derail when doing this. So, by adding a 1 oz. weight over each truck on the UP double door and on the Santa Fe regular box car, it solved the problem with only 4 additional ounces for the engine to pull, which is negligible.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

For weight, I listened to several experts on this forum back in the 1990's to buy 7mm buck shot. One 25lb bag purchased at a good sporting goods store will last a lifetime and using wathers goo and crazy glue mix keeps the shot where I want it to be.

Note for MTH Premier auto carriers. I had to overweigh them to 30 oz total by placing  the buck shot in the plastic center sill on the frame. The o.e.m. cars are top heavy but by adding the extra weight very low by the trucks, the cars perform flawlessly.

For weight, I listened to several experts on this forum back in the 1990's to buy 7mm buck shot. One 25lb bag purchased at a good sporting goods store will last a lifetime and using wathers goo and crazy glue mix keeps the shot where I want it to be.

Note for MTH Premier auto carriers. I had to overweigh them to 30 oz total by placing  the buck shot in the plastic center sill on the frame. The o.e.m. cars are top heavy but by adding the extra weight very low by the trucks, the cars perform flawlessly.

The shot is the best way I've found for adding weight to tank cars.  Many don't have any way to get it inside, so I drill a small hole in the bottom center and feed the shot in there.

The shot is the best way I've found for adding weight to tank cars.  Many don't have any way to get it inside, so I drill a small hole in the bottom center and feed the shot in there.

Makes sense, but just curious: do you leave it loose (I imagine it would settle in the bottom of the curve during use, and not rattle around too much in any event), or do you add a shot of glue after loading the shot and just shake the contents around a bit (think, rattle can! ) to distribute the glue on the shot, before letting it all dry?

Last edited by Steve Tyler

Thanks, everyone, for some very helpful tips to get all of my rolling stock in shape. The point about the wheels rolling as freely as possible along with the proper weights will be taken to heart when I get them all ready. I know some of the wheels don't roll as smoothly as is optimal. I guess I'll just have to see how everything tracks when I'm ready.

Tom

Obviously, gondolas and flats are easy. I have real marble blocks and tailings in those cars. The black covered hoppers are also full of rocks. Th gray covered hoppers are full of popcorn. I just poured it in!  The box cars have rocks stuffed through the doors. Most cars run ~ 1 pound.

Tank cars bring up the rear because they are hard to weight, but I see some great ideas here about weighting tank cars that I'm going to try. The grade in the video is around 6%, then flat for about 10 feet and then back down as it goes around the room. I can only pull about 27 cars without the train catching itself but they run fine.

Good luck and Happy New Year!!

Attachments

Videos (1)
IMG_7272

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×