Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

RickO - I'm not sure I understand your title.  I'm not aware of Amtrak stopping for crossings as a normal rule of operation.  If you're suggesting that Amtrak should have stopped for this crossing, well, I'm sure you have enough railroad sense to know that trains can't stop on a "dime" (figuratively speaking).  Could you clarify?

Thanks,

Steve

Last edited by Rich Melvin

Purely tongue in cheek Steve, merely another take on the way these incidents are reported making it sound like its the RR's fault. I.E. "the train hit the truck at full speed".

Fortunately the report is that eveyone is O.K. It certainly couldn't have been fun for the crew with that fireball over the cab.

The irony is that it was stated is the truck belongs to a contractor hired by UP to clean up debris along the tracks

That's my understanding.  Apparently the crew was hired to clean up debris around the track.  Who'd of thought they would have parked a vehicle on an active line.  To save you some time I've already submitted the vid to the Darwin Award Committee.

Steve

I thought I heard ABC world news say that the truck stalled on the tracks and the driver got out just in time. I dont believe the truck was "parked" on the tracks.

Someone perhaps should have the job at UP of

1. ensuring that outside contractors have trained their employees in the Amtrak contractors' safety course or the UP contractors' safety course

2. co-ordinating and advising contractors of the track schedules of all trains expected to pass the work location

3. issuing special train orders to operations employees advising them of slow orders in the vicinity of contracting work

4. posting flag persons at locations at both ends of the work zone, with placement sufficient to allow trains (under slow orders) enough time to stop in case of a track fouling

Oh, wait, why am I saying all this? I'm just a civilian with little to no railroad safety credentials.  It's not my business to butt in with the bleeding obvious to one of the largest corporations in the country, and tell them how to run their shop. There are obviously people much more experienced and with railroad industry authority to perform these tasks.

Someone perhaps should have the job at UP of

1. ensuring that outside contractors have trained their employees in the Amtrak contractors' safety course or the UP contractors' safety course

2. co-ordinating and advising contractors of the track schedules of all trains expected to pass the work location

3. issuing special train orders to operations employees advising them of slow orders in the vicinity of contracting work

4. posting flag persons at locations at both ends of the work zone, with placement sufficient to allow trains (under slow orders) enough time to stop in case of a track fouling

Come on, Arthur. All of the things you list are already a part of the Operating and Safety rules at every railroad, and somebody already has the job you “suggest.”  You don’t know the circumstances behind this wreck. Maybe the truck stalled or broke something in the drive train? There are a lot of other possibilities.

It’s called an ACCIDENT, and they happen every day, no matter how thick the rule book is.

"All of the things you list are already a part of the Operating and Safety rules at every railroad, and somebody already has the job you “suggest.”

I guess my attempt at sarcasm was too subtle.

There is a lower chance of an "accident" happening when all safety guidelines are followed. Redundant safety rules, especially in an industry that is known for its big and scary moving parts, greatly reduce the possibility of an "accident."  Somebody (many bodies) was asleep at the switch when it came to the planning and execution, even on a seemingly simple and mundane operation as cleaning up stuff along the ROW.  I will agree that railroad company employees are trained to know what to do and what not to do. It's the visitors who need to embrace the safety culture of the host property. In this case, the evidence speaks for itself: even the owners/employees were lax.

To your point about my not knowing all the facts: let's not argue, unless you really want to.  Working along the ROW should require that old concept of communication. Did they have a radio that they could use in the unlikely event that they fouled the track? Did they know how to use it? Was there a pre-established bug-out plan? I would love to be on the investigating team, just to see how many common-sense safety procedures, even the ones that a simple-minded, non-railroad guy like me could imagine, were not followed. The only fact I really need is the video.  Sic loquitur pro se.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×