Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Firewood:

I have not yet seen the words "stiesel" or "stelectric" show up yet, so I'm throwing them in.............

 

stiesel

stelectric

Half your photos are photoshopped. Photo 1 is Sierra No. 3 (Well, at least the bottom part).
 
Steam is ALIVE. Diesels are just big trucks on rails. Often with the horn to match.
Last edited by smd4
Originally Posted by smd4:
Originally Posted by Firewood:

I have not yet seen the words "stiesel" or "stelectric" show up yet, so I'm throwing them in.............

 

Half your photos are photoshopped. Photo 1 is Sierra No. 3 (Well, at least the bottom part).
 
Steam is ALIVE. Diesels are just big trucks on rails. Often with the horn to match.

Not to hijack the thread, but I have ZERO photoshop skills, . The Swiss steam electrics were adapted to cheap hydro power vs. expensive imported coal. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...ric-steam_locomotive

 

There were a lot of old 10-wheelers with the firebox-fitting gap between the two rear axles, not just Sierra #3. Connecting a diesel mechanical transmission to a steam chassis would be no big deal to a good master mechanic. Somewhere out west there was a Shay converted to a diesel center-cab. Is that a Shay-sel?

 

Then there was this one - 4 steam cylinders, 4 diesel cylinders. 

http://www.douglas-self.com/MU.../kitson/kitsonst.htm

 

But yeah, I agree......big trucks on rails.

That's it!   My trusty, crusty Rivarossi Heisler is going into the shop for conversion.  She will come out with the hood from an Alco S1 filling in where the boiler used to be and the cylinders will go by the board.  Modernize the lights and we'll be unleashing the first " Heisel".   Dynamic brakes may not be available on this chooch !

Originally Posted by Firewood:
Not to hijack the thread, but I have ZERO photoshop skills, . The Swiss steam electrics were adapted to cheap hydro power vs. expensive imported coal. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...ric-steam_locomotive

 

There were a lot of old 10-wheelers with the firebox-fitting gap between the two rear axles, not just Sierra #3. Connecting a diesel mechanical transmission to a steam chassis would be no big deal to a good master mechanic.

 

But yeah, I agree......big trucks on rails.

Didn't say you photoshopped it...someone did!

 

That's definitely Sierra No. 3.

Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:

I seriously doubt it's #3 Photoshopped, the angles, shadows, details and textures are too consistent.  If it is a Photoshop job, someone went though a lot of trouble for no reward.

 

Who knows what evils lie in the backwoods railroads of America?

 

Rusty

I would agree with you, Rusty. The finish is too consistent. Also, the mechanical layout looks consistent too. The engine is connected to a transmission of sorts, with a logically-placed control stand beside it (probably needing massive upper body strength to operate), and the final gearing looks like somebody raided a steam turbine plant or mine machinery for the reduction gears. The backwoods machine shop would have been able to manufacture a suitable axle for the final drive and shrink the wheels back on. I wonder if it ever had a cab?

Notice I have expressed no steam or diesel preference with this monstrosity.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×