OK, watching and participating on the Forum, I can't help but see the posts (1) moaning the loss of the LHS, (2) commenting on how a 1953 Lionel bulletin to dealers is so relevant and (3) searching for the best price on the BigBoy.
It seems to me that there's a lot of inconsistency between number 1 and number 3, and I'd like to relate that to 1953. If memory serves me correctly, there were Fair Trade Laws throughout much of the country in the 1950's (and certainly in Pennsylvania). Basically, a Fair Trade Law said that the manufacturer could set a minimum retail price and a dealer had to sell the product for at least that price. No discounting. So the only way to compete was through service. If you went into your LHS back then, you could talk to the dealer, ask questions, etc. If the dealer was selling the product at what was generally described as "list price", the dealer didn't have to be concerned that you could buy for less. So if he offered advice and service, the sale was probably his if you bought the item.
That's not the case any longer and hasn't been for a long time. So while we may "wax nostalgic" for the good old days, the good old days included paying list price for whatever we purchased and paying Ma Bell for every long distance phone call. Sort of strange the way we think of capitalism and competition and the American way. But let's not confuse reality with our imaginations.
So now you look at the Forum posts and combine the moaning about the loss of the LHS with shopping for the best price for the BigBoy (and lots of other things). We have every right to shop for the best price. Personally, I don't do that as much as look for a dealer who will treat me fairly time and time again, but I fully respect everyone's right to search for the best price on every item.
MY QUESTION IS, IF YOU SEARCH FOR THE BEST PRICE ON MOST ITEMS AND BUY ALL OVER, DO YOU THEN COMPLAIN BECAUSE A LHS CLOSES?
Just curious.
Gerry