Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by clem k:

Depends on the bridge. If no ballast there is a speed restriction.

Why? Never heard of THAT.

 

Thanks for your input Hot water I was told that by someone i thought was knowledgeable. they said the ballast absorbed the shock of the trains, they wondered why i didn't ballast my mainline  bridges. Thank you again for clearing that up. 

Don:  It's true that the Milwaukee used ballasted deck-girder bridges out west as well as some ballasted through-girders, too.  But I do remember seeing through girder bridges as well as truss bridges with open decks.  I actually like the appearance of the open deck effect because you can see through it somewhat. 

 

On my layout, I have five Atlas deck girder bridges that simulate the Milwaukee's western route through the mountains.  Yeah, I know that they should have a ballasted deck, but I just can't bring myself to covering up all that special work that Atlas went through such efforts to simulate.  I do have one series of bridges that are ballasted over because the bridges are arranged in an "S" curve shape.  On the layout, the actual structure was cut out of a fairly long 2" x 8" so there was no open structure to worry about covering.  It's pretty "clunky" but it is sturdy enough for me to actually climb on.

 

I don't ever recall seeing a ballasted trestle bridge, though, do any of you?

 

Paul Fischer

It depends on the bridge as others have said. What hasn't been said is, what is ballast's function? It is there to provide water drainage, so the ties don't rot as quickly. It also helps hold the track in place. 

 

So obviously, any bridge that has an open bottom will not have ballast. Wooden trestles will almost never have it, whereas masonry bridges almost always do. Plate girder bridges can go either way.

Hi Spence,

 

As others have mentioned, there are many examples of bridges with and without ballast.  Wood trestles, truss and drawbridges are usually built without ballast.  Plate girder and steel trestles are much more likely to have ballast.

 

In addition to drainage, ballast does provide cushioning to the trains.  Speed restrictions depend more on the condition of the structure and track as well as curvature.  Many older trestles and bridges, with or without ballast, have speed restrictions to help reduce wear and tear.

 

As Don mentioned, the Milwaukee ballasted all bridges on the pacific extension.  From St. Paul Pass west the bridges had concrete troughs on top of steel structures.  East of St. Paul Pass the troughs were made of creosoted timbers.  The troughs were filled with ballast and the track was laid to the same construction standards as on land.  Today many of the Milwaukee's ballasted deck bridges have been repurposed as dirt roads and trails.  Here's a shot of Eagle Nest Bridge in Montana, which is now used as an access road by local ranchers.

 

 

We have recently installed our recreation of the Eagle Nest Bridge on the NorthWest Trunk Lines.

 

 

The Milwaukee was not alone in using this type of bridge construction.  The Santa Fe used a similar wooden through design on several bridges through Abo Canyon, NM.

 

 

 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×