Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by phil gresho:

My HO friends swear by it, but I don't know of anyone who's used it for our hi-rail engines.....Have I missed something?

Yes, I believe you have miss all the many discussions concerning Bullfrog Snot, over the past few years.

 

You might try the "search" function to find some of the many folks that use it.

Originally Posted by RICH B:

Dan

i see you use it on tinplate,have similiar slippage,what wheels do you put it on ,as to not interfere with continuity.

thanks rich

 

IMG_6592

 

I applied the Frog Snot to two of the drivers(left side in the photo)on my tinplate engine.The grounding is still made through the other side of the drivers,front and rear trailing trucks and even the tender wheels.The Frog Snot turns from green to black pretty quickly,even on clean track,but seems to keep working after the color change. 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_6592
Originally Posted by Prewar Pappy:

In the days before Bullfrog Snot and traction tires, what did they do?

 

The correct answer is...Run small, short consists. A practice still in use today. 

What my dad and I did in the '50s was to cut a thin strip of electrical "friction tape" and apply it to two of the engine drive wheels.  This worked well, but our trains were only run on holiday layouts.

Tom B 

Originally Posted by phil gresho:

The MAIN comment against Frogsnot is that it forms  [permanent?]  flat spots when an engine sits still for some time....

Only if you leave the model sitting ON TRACK, do "flat spots" develop. The models I have with Bullfrog Snot get run, or go back into their plastic tool box for storage again, thus I've not had that issue.

Originally Posted by phil gresho:

Pete:  Helpful comment, with which I agree.  My use of silicone was for locos with the traction-tire channel.  It was probably too thick.....as would be the case for the 'snot',  i believe.

The various steam locomotive models that I have used the Bullfrog Snot on were ALL due to thrown/broken traction tires, thus I "filled the groove" with multiple layers of the BF Snot. I let each layer sit from 30 min to an hour, and then applied another very thin layer, and after the traction tire grove is completely filled, the model sat, up-side-down for 2 or 3 days. It has always worked well for my needs.

Originally Posted by boxcoupler:
Originally Posted by Prewar Pappy:

In the days before Bullfrog Snot and traction tires, what did they do?

 

The correct answer is...Run small, short consists. A practice still in use today. 

What my dad and I did in the '50s was to cut a thin strip of electrical "friction tape" and apply it to two of the engine drive wheels.  This worked well, but our trains were only run on holiday layouts.

Tom B 

Added weight is my preferred option to increase pulling power. I've added weight to many of my O and HO locomotives.

 

The "snot" name is disgusting and I would never buy it or try it on that account.

Originally Posted by boxcoupler:
Originally Posted by Prewar Pappy:

In the days before Bullfrog Snot and traction tires, what did they do?

 

The correct answer is...Run small, short consists. A practice still in use today. 

What my dad and I did in the '50s was to cut a thin strip of electrical "friction tape" and apply it to two of the engine drive wheels.  This worked well, but our trains were only run on holiday layouts.

Tom B 

 

Originally Posted by Marty Fitzhenry:

Back in the day, some people put masking tape on an outside rail on a grade.

My original post was in sarcasm aimed toward Std Gauge. Back then they added more weight. I have six engines that my grandfather added lead weights. I remember the black friction tape from the 50's. It was a bugger to clean all the residue mess. But it worked and how.

Marty, I remember the masking tape as well. Contrary to what people say, those were not the days. Rubber tires are the best thing since bubble gum. This is my opinion. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×