Skip to main content

As much as I like weathered cars & locos, occasionally new rolling stock does make an appearance. Such was the case last week the BNSF delivered a requested string of gondolas to our scrap yard that appeared brand new !  Our yard is at the end of the branch so we have the tracks to ourselves when we switch with our old Trackmobile, it does ok with empties but struggles with the loads.

ACL & gons 009

ACL & gons 010

ACL & gons 011

Attachments

Images (3)
  • ACL & gons 009
  • ACL & gons 010
  • ACL & gons 011
Last edited by Rich Melvin
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Three-four years ago, CSX replaced all the gravel cars on the Rock Runner(s) that run between WVa and Bladensburg, MD. with new (black) cars.  It was neat to see, almost everyday, a clean string of new cars.  One old gravel car (gray), kept loaded, is always behind the locomotives.  Since the trains are kept on private property at loading/unloading, they are pretty graffiti free today.  However, over time, they have gotten dinged and banged up by the front end loaders.

Bob

I admire the realism of well weathered cars, locomotives and buildings. Putting these together is a demonstration of artistic skill. However, not all trains roll through only grimy cityscapes.

On my own layout I prefer equipment that looks new. There's no graffiti in my "little world", the trains are clean and bright, the buildings are as well. While railfanning, I've always preferred to watch trains working their way through dramatic scenery, as at Horseshoe Curve, Iona Island, etc.

There is plenty of room in the hobby to appreciate both approaches. One is not better than the other, though I believe it takes tremendous artistic talent to weather realistically and to craft scenes that are convincing. Guys like SIRT and Norm Charbonneau (and many others) have an artist's eye and a craftsman's touch which make their scenes so compelling. Me, I just like to do some scenery and run my clean trains!

 

Some railroads, the Frisco included, took great pains to keep their locomotives clean.  Frisco steamers, for example, were scrubbed with hot water and kerosene at every major terminal almost right up to the end of steam operations.  The running gear was polished with oily waste.  A dirty Frisco engine is just as (un)prototypical as a clean, shiny one.  The T&P also devoted resources to keeping their engines clean.

The MoPac, on the other hand, . . . .

palallin posted:

Some railroads, the Frisco included, took great pains to keep their locomotives clean.  Frisco steamers, for example, were scrubbed with hot water and kerosene at every major terminal almost right up to the end of steam operations.  The running gear was polished with oily waste.  A dirty Frisco engine is just as (un)prototypical as a clean, shiny one.  The T&P also devoted resources to keeping their engines clean.

The MoPac, on the other hand, . . . .

The key word is "almost..."

4-8-4 SLSF 4500 Tired

4-8-4 SLSF 4515

Rusty

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 4-8-4 SLSF 4500 Tired
  • 4-8-4 SLSF 4515
Last edited by Rusty Traque
Rusty Traque posted:

However, with the exception of publicity shots like the Pacemaker pictures or new car deliveries, weathered, dirty or whatever cars will easily outnumber clean ones.

Rusty

Not to mention the fact that those "new from the factory" freight cars only look like that for about 2 to 3 days. Thus, if you are trying to model THAT build date on the side of those cars, then they would NOT be prototypical for any time frame after that build date.

bbunge posted:

Three-four years ago, CSX replaced all the gravel cars on the Rock Runner(s) that run between WVa and Bladensburg, MD. with new (black) cars.  It was neat to see, almost everyday, a clean string of new cars.  One old gravel car (gray), kept loaded, is always behind the locomotives.  Since the trains are kept on private property at loading/unloading, they are pretty graffiti free today.  However, over time, they have gotten dinged and banged up by the front end loaders.

Bob

They have to keep that load on the head end because at Bladensburg, the first empty would derail when they started going in there with 6 axle units. That happened about 3 times or so, and out came a new bulletin saying you must hold onto one load when working Bladensburg. This didn't happen when they used 4-axles on those jobs.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×