Skip to main content

     Considering switching to 2R but could use a little advise when it comes to constructing my layout. What is the minimum width I should construct my layout? I was thinking 6 or 8 ft wide and 16 till 20ft in lenght. After doing some reading I see that 2R track needs more room when it comes to the radius of the curves. Would 6 or 8 ft wide be wide enough? Also any suggestion when it comes to track? I was looking at the Atlas 2R and also ME track. Looking for the most friendly track system out there and I know I will probably get alot of different answers on this but any advice would be great.

 

Thanks,

 

Bruce

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

You really need at least 84" wide benchwork to do a turnback curve in O scale--and that would be a 36" radius curve.

 

Bigger curves will allow you to run bigger equipment--all of Atlas's 6-axle diesels need at least a 40.5" radius curve to function well.

 

Keep in mind that these are BARE minimum radius numbers--many modelers advocate a curve radius of at least 48", or even 60"...

 

Jeff C

Chris,

 

     Would like to stick with diesel locomotives such as RS's, SW's, GP's, etc. Layout would me pretty much one level with loops connected by turnouts along with a few spurs. Would like to keep it as simple as possible due to being new to 2 rail and not that familiar with the electrical wiring of the 2 rail. Any suggestions when it comes to track?

 

Bruce

 

Sorry, in my opinion there currently is no friendly bullet proof open stock two rail track system.  You still need a fair amount of patience & tinkering. 

 

Supply side of track & turnout dependability / availability are not quite what I think newbys would call friendly.  Possible? Yes, I do a lot of it, but it's not right off the shelf. 

 

If you want true plug and play, three rail is the way to go.  Three rail may be best for the size of benchwork you mention also. tt

Hi Bruce,

     Ok, well with what you would like to run(4 axle) you could get it down to a 36" radius, but I wouldn't go below a 42" which will give you a 7ft diameter adding on some to allow for what ever scenery you may want to do.  Are you planning on an "around the room" style? 
     As for track, there is Atlas which has nickel silver code .148 rails, and they offer flex track in 40" sections and a selection of curves in 36", 40.5", 45", 49.5" and 54" right now I think darn near everyone is out of stock...Atlas is saying the first qrtr of 2013 for more stock but I think it will be later than that, they also offer 2 turnout options one is a #7.5 and the other a #5 turnout.  Their turnouts however do have overly large frogs and large guard rails, both of which can be corrected if you so choose, and  San Juan car co offers a detail kit..

http://www.sanjuancarco.com/product_p/5006.htm 

 

      Micro Engineering does offer 36" long sections of Nickle silver track in code 100,125 or 148.  They do not offer turnouts in O scale.  You can order it weathered or non weathered, the weathered apparently has a chemical etching that makes it darn near impossible to flex as it was explained to me in another thread by AGHR Matt.  I myself have not worked with the ME yet, but I have some on the way for an area I just can't comfortably hand lay in. 

 

Here is another option for turnouts.....definetly worth a look.

 

 http://www.oscalemag.com/docs/turnouts.pdf

Last edited by N&W Class J

 

The track system comments Tom made are correct unfortunately. One cannot jump into 2 rail without some skill and patience, and financial where with all (check turnout prices...ugh!). Three rail does allow for a more user friendly entry into O scale, but the fact remains for the ultimate realism there is no substitute for the classic beauty of 2 Rail O scale. 

That said; consider the space friendly aspects of a switching layout. It is one of 2 rail O scales better options since 2-3 foot wide bench work can accommodate a nice operating scenario. If you absolutely need to see trains running continuously, then the limiting factor of larger curve radius and their space demands must be considered, and as others have pointed out larger is better for visual appeal (an important ingredient) and operational reliability. I set my minimum radius at 48 inches and small locomotives such as you have mentioned will handle such a radius just fine and appearance will be also be acceptable.

I suggest you purchase a copy of A Guide to Modern O Scale and digest it before taking the plunge at the deep end of the pool.

 

Good luck!

 

Bob

Bruce:

   Where, in general terms [ state, say ] do you live ?  The best way to advance into two rail, assuming none of your model rr buddies are two railers, is to attend an 0 scale show;  provided you have a general plan, this is also a great place to buy track and turnouts.  The "March Meet" -- see post elsewhere in Forum -- in 2.5 months is THE show to attend, if you can.

   I think some of the comments posted above on the difficulties of sourcing, etc,  are a little on the "defeatist" [ or "pessimistic", if you prefer ] side myself.

 

Best regards, SZ

I suggest that you buy and study John Armstrong's book "Track Planning for Realistic Operation." You can buy the current edition from Kalmbach or buy a used copy from abebooks.com for less than $10. It hasn't changed much over the years. I'm still using the first edition, third printing from 1969. John gave me a copy of the current edition but I traded it for the first edition of Model Railroad Planning which I neglected to buy.

Considering the time, effort and expense involved in building a layout, some up front time thinking about what you want as suggested by previous posters is very worthwhile. I think that a small along the wall switching layout or an around the wall layout are worthy of consideration.

Larry Kline
Bruce,
 
 I see you mentioned that you would like to stick with early diesels, I too took a look into 2 rail, being that I like to model late 1980's, early 1990's, what I found is that 95% of available engines are steam. I've been to the 2 rail shows and the availablilty of diesels is very, very slim. MTH is the best bet. Have you
looked to see if what you need is available?
 
Originally Posted by bag09:
 

Chris,

 

     Would like to stick with diesel locomotives such as RS's, SW's, GP's, etc. Layout would me pretty much one level with loops connected by turnouts along with a few spurs. Would like to keep it as simple as possible due to being new to 2 rail and not that familiar with the electrical wiring of the 2 rail. Any suggestions when it comes to track?

 

Bruce

 

 

"The Little Engine that Could".  I'm not  a 2 railer however take a look at the recent OGR Cover Story run 261 On Paul Lally's 2 rail layout. He has done a great job with his modest 2 rail layout with Atlas Track, small engines and rolling stock and he did it all with 24" radius. Do what works for you.

One other thing to consider: Instead of building your own layout, join a 2 Rail club! For the dues you pay, you'd save yourself a LOT of trouble, and learn a LOT about 2 rail. 

 

Or you could find a 3 rail club that might be interested in converting over to 2 rail. 

 

Not the most reliable or practical options, but options none the less. 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×