Skip to main content

Hey all,

 

Got an interesting problem.  I have a remote that refuses to work wireless.  I have tried it tethered and it functions properly.  I have reseated the Trans. Board and it will not remain tight.  I have had the remote work while I held the board in place.  Has anyone else had a similar experience.  Do I need to replace the Trans. Board?  Thanks.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by rtr12:

I don't remember if it was the remote or TIU board (or maybe both?), but I was thinking Barry had suggested using something to hold the board in place somehow if it had come loose. I can't remember the exact material he suggested to use? Maybe he will be along to clarify. Obviously something non-conductive. 

I can't speak for Barry but I'm pretty sure it's a piece of foam . (not Styrofoam)

Cheryl,

    Long ago when the 1st generation hand helds came out I had a similar problem,

mostly do to the kids repetitive dropping of the DCS hand held remote control, any way

Barry advised me to cut a piece of packing foam and insert it in the back of the hand held, just big enough to let the door set up properly, after doing this it made everything snug in the hand held and I never had a problem with that remote control again, the trick is getting everything tight enough to not allow any movement at all,

without over tightening any thing.   The little give in the foam packaging seems to take up the required space without smashing the board and causing any damage.

PCRR/Dave

I have tried all this, no go.  In order for it to work properly I must exert an extreme amount of pressure on the board and there is already a piece of sticky foam between the Trans. board and the main board.  I appreciate all efforts, at this point it would seem the only answer is to use the remote in a tethered application.  Thank you.

I got a question, why does the boards require a pressure foam or what ever to hold them in place, is this a poor design, why can't something be done to make the remote work?how is the transmitter and other boards connected, just pressure points? im not sure can anyone put some pictures of the remote apart with the circuit boards photographed. There must be a permanent fix, if need be solder jumpers together or what ever it takes to make the remote work and be more Dependable?

 

Alan

Alan,

   Good question, and probably when MTH upgrades the hand held remotes it will be fixed in some permanent way, also not all hand held remotes have this problem, one of mine does the other does not.

 

willgee,

   Bill, Roger that had no plans for modification after your upgrade to a fully rechargeable hand held remote control.  One on the charger one working, no need to do any thing else. 

 

PCRR/Dave

Last edited by Pine Creek Railroad
Originally Posted by repair technician:

I got a question, why does the boards require a pressure foam or what ever to hold them in place, is this a poor design, why can't something be done to make the remote work?how is the transmitter and other boards connected, just pressure points? im not sure can anyone put some pictures of the remote apart with the circuit boards photographed. There must be a permanent fix, if need be solder jumpers together or what ever it takes to make the remote work and be more Dependable?

 

Alan

I don't understand why the boards are not soldered in   or at least some type  of device (plastic wire tie) to prevent this problem. It's been like this since 2002.

 It's PITA taking the thing apart...

  the 2 boards use an interference fit multi pin connector(no soldering possible here)..the foam pads i have used were 1/4 thick by 1.5 x 1.5 inches and similar material that would come with a window air conditioner (open cell type foam). your plastic remote case once assembled keeps everything in place pretty much forever...or until a thumb wheel breaks

Last edited by willygee

Alan & Gregg,

 is this a poor design, 

In  my opinion, yes, it is.

There must be a permanent fix,

I don't understand why the boards are not soldered in   or at least some type  of device (plastic wire tie) to prevent this problem. It's been like this since 2002.

The boards are not soldered in place because that would make a transceiver replacement very, very difficult.

 

However, commencing some time ago the remote had a piece of double-sided tape added to firmly hold the transceiver board in place. While that typically keeps the remote transceiver board from floating out of the socket, it really makes things considerably more difficult when it's necessary to replace the transceiver board.

 

I much prefer just putting a piece of spongey foam over the transceiver board to hold it in place. I've modified many remotes in that way and have never had a transceiver board so-modified float out of its socket.

 

I'm starting to suspect that Cheryl's problem is in fact a bent transceiver board pin that's not making good contact in the socket.

I have a feeling the new upgraded remote is going to be one of those new fangled smart phone thingies, forcing me to trade in my flip phone.

Everything that I've learned to date as regards a "new" DCS Remote tells that, if the forthcoming DCS app is a success (the 2nd app, not the initial free one), we won't see a new DCS Remote for a long, long time.

Originally Posted by Barry Broskowitz:
I have a feeling the new upgraded remote is going to be one of those new fangled smart phone thingies, forcing me to trade in my flip phone.

Everything that I've learned to date as regards a "new" DCS Remote tells that, if the forthcoming DCS app is a success (the 2nd app, not the initial free one), we won't see a new DCS Remote for a long, long time.

Was afraid of that, but everything is certainly pointing in that direction. It looks like this is happening in both camps too. I don't expect a new Legacy remote anytime soon either. Both manufacturers are showing a lot of excitement for the new apps for train controls. Probably a good idea for the younger folks and attracting them into the train hobby. They do like the devices and apps.

 

I will be hanging on to both my old fashioned DCS and Legacy remotes as long as I can.  

I knew you were kidding.  That's why I included the "Would you believe...?"

 

On the broader subject, I think the remote is not bad, and only needs a little tweaking, like holding the boards together, battery case cover, and weak thumbwheel.  It is notable that while the TIU has had to go through several iterations since its initial issuance, the remote has not.

Last edited by RJR

The problem with my remote was... I think I lifted more than the antenna when taking it apart. Some of the trace  circuits lifted off the board as well.. Impossible for me  to fix.   I'm a big MTH fan but my cab-1 from about 96 still works, been on the floor many time and the antenna is broken in half.

Barry,

 

I don't think any pins are bent because it cannot be seperated far enough.  But I do think that something on TX board is gone as it will not work at all anymore.  It will work tethered and eventually I planned to use it as a test bench system to do programming, etc..  I've basically set it aside for now.

 

Thanks guys, for all the input.

no Barry menu/advanced/info only brings up all the engines, i want to bring up the remote battery charge condition and the odometer and other engine related features on the engines in the remote!

Alan

Never mind Bary i figured it out ounce the engine number came up i had to press the thumb wheel then it showed up!

Thanks for the info Barry.I'm waiting to get your book on DCS my train shop said they have ordered it.

Again Thanks

Alan

Last edited by Alan Mancus

Alan,

menu/advanced/info only brings up all the engines, i want to bring up the remote battery charge condition and the odometer and other engine related features on the engines in the remote!

Yes, it does.

 

Then you scroll to, or enter the number of, the engine in which you're interested, and press the thumbwheel.

 

You really need my book!

Last edited by Barry Broskowitz

I am talking about scrolling through the menu to see the different functions.  There is a lot that can be learned just with the remote.

 

I understand trying to send some messages to an engine can cause error or no engine on track.

 

To me it is like going through a computer menu.  See what the subfolders are and what is in it.  G

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×