Skip to main content

A couple of months ago there was a discussion on the weekly 1/43 diecast thread about the ultra-streamlined Texaco Doodlebug tank truck of the late 30's. It was much lamented that the only models that could be found were an Ertl toy coin bank in 1/32 and an HO model, with nothing available that would be the right size for an 0 gauge layout. Well, I just picked up a third version, in (almost) 0 scale at 1/55. It was made by DeHanes, a boutique builder of die-cast trucks that makes its products here in the USA. The Doodlebug was produced in 1990 so it isn't all that easy to find, but one occasionally turns up on eBay. I just received mine today; here are some photos showing size comparisons. At 1/55 it is a bit small for an 0 gauge layout, especially if it is sitting next to 1/43 cars, but if it is put by itself, and especially in the background for forced perspective, it could work. It would go quite nicely with traditional size Lionel. In any case, it's a lot closer than 1/32 or HO!

 

I'm thinking that my 1/32 Doodlebug would make a nice load for a Standard Gauge flatcar. 

 

DeHanes 1/55 Doodlebug with Ertl 1/32 Doodlebug. Platform and figures in background are Standard Gauge.

Doodlebug Pair 1.jpg

 DeHanes Doodlebug in foreground, with a Brooklin 1/43 Buick and a 1/32 Doodlebug for comparison. It's noticeably undersize next to the Buick.

 Doodlebug Pair 2.jpg.JPG

 

DeHanes Doodlebug with slightly undersized die-cast toy car of unknown origin.They look pretty good together. 

Doodlebug and Car

 

DeHanes Doodlebug on a traditional size Lionel flatcar. Seems to be in good proportion.

Doodlebug on Flatcar

 

 

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Doodlebug and Car
  • Doodlebug on Flatcar
  • Doodlebug Pair 1.jpg
  • Doodlebug Pair 2.jpg.JPG
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

These are great trucks. I have that Ertl version that Texaco sold, and it looks very good with O scale equipment. The DeHanes version would be far too small for O scale. It looks acceptable on the traditional flatcar, but even there if it were a little larger it would be a bit better. Just my opinion. 

 

I don't completely trust different makers' notations of scale - 1/48, 1/50, 1/43, etc. I've seen a lot of variations in those designations.

The Ertl 1/32 version looks OK with scale-size 0 gauge trains because the prototype was so small. The model is oversize in relation to other 0 scale vehicles. It was a very small truck, not that much bigger than a large car. It was 26 feet long, or 6 1/2 inches in 0 scale. Height was only 72 inches. A 1934 Cadillac Series 90 sedan was 20 feet long and 69.5" tall. Check out this photo. I agree the DeHanes model is undersize; that's why I suggest it be used in a forced perspective situation rather than alongside larger vehicles and scale rail cars. The lack of a coin slot is an improvement. 

 

Texaco Doodlebug 1

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Texaco Doodlebug 1
Last edited by Southwest Hiawatha
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

The lack of a coin slot is an improvement. 

I hadn't realized the prototypes of these trucks were so small. Still, I think the larger size is better, particularly for standard O use. Of course it would be better if models with coin slots didn't have them, but they're pretty easy to fill in and paint over.

I have both sizes also.  The small one was disappointing.  Sold on a big auction website as 1:43 but . . .  The larger one is just two large, so here it sits, dusty now after about a year: I plan to make a 1:48 model using this one as a guide.  Pretty simple shape to make, etc.  

 

I really would like a good model that I could convert to 'Streets.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×