Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Thanks for the compliments everybody!

 

Ben,

 

I know this guy in Jersey who can 'find things' Your Yellowstone is very happy in Mercer.  

 

JD,

 

I cannot seem to get the hang of chalks.  I prefer acrylic dry brushing combined with enamels in an airbrush.  I just picked up an Iwata HP-C+ that is great for doing fine detail work.

 

Dave

I admire the work you put into it....but I never got the weathering itch like you fellows do...I mean, why dirty up a shiny new engine or stock?  I know, realism....but at one time these classics were new, and they did try to keep them clean as best as they could; the size prohibiting much effort.  Museums make sure their engines are pristine looking.  I take it you guys never wash your cars, and leave the mud caked on to give it that realistic look.......lol...just an opinion; not meant to be more than that...

I am not an expert, but those few brand new steamers I have seen lasted about fifteen minutes without blemishes due to hot oil, leaking water and steam, and cinders.  That is probably why some modelers like to weather stuff.

 

My steam models go through stages - brass for several years, then gloss Scalecoat and decals for a couple more, then heavy weather.  For some reason, the heavy weather does more for winning contests than does the finest workmanship.

 

Three rail modeling is not an area where I would expect much realism, but those DMIR locomotives do look real.

why dirty up a shiny new engine or stock?  I know, realism....but at one time these classics were new, and they did try to keep them clean as best as they could

Not all, look at this Seaboard E7:

 

 

We can only hope this was later in its life and not on some crack train such as the Silver Meteor

 

I think management had more to do with the condition of the engines more so than the crews.  From what I've read most crews took pride in their engines and tried to keep them clean.  Management on the other hand looked at what it cost to keep the appearance of them up.

 

I tend to keep mine shiny as well, at least for now.  Rolling stock will soon be getting the dirt treatment as time permits.

 

I prefer to use chalks and have done a couple of cars using them.  I don't seal the chalk onto the car and any fingerprints can be rubbed out.

Originally Posted by Erie Express:

I admire the work you put into it....but I never got the weathering itch like you fellows do...I mean, why dirty up a shiny new engine or stock?  I know, realism....but at one time these classics were new, and they did try to keep them clean as best as they could; the size prohibiting much effort.  Museums make sure their engines are pristine looking.  I take it you guys never wash your cars, and leave the mud caked on to give it that realistic look.......lol...just an opinion; not meant to be more than that...

So, your entire layout and all your locomotives/cars are perfectly clean and pristine. To each his own I guess, but that is NOT the concept of 3-Rail SCALE modeling we are all trying to accomplish here. 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Erie Express:

I admire the work you put into it....but I never got the weathering itch like you fellows do...I mean, why dirty up a shiny new engine or stock?  I know, realism....but at one time these classics were new, and they did try to keep them clean as best as they could; the size prohibiting much effort.  Museums make sure their engines are pristine looking.  I take it you guys never wash your cars, and leave the mud caked on to give it that realistic look.......lol...just an opinion; not meant to be more than that...

So, your entire layout and all your locomotives/cars are perfectly clean and pristine. To each his own I guess, but that is NOT the concept of 3-Rail SCALE modeling we are all trying to accomplish here. 

Really?  There's a concept that weathering must be a part of 3-rail scale modeling?  I think it's interesting that diesels,especially Santa Fe's with the chrome & stainless models are very seldom if ever weathered.  I've noted quite a few members with their pristine looking diesels, and yes steamers.  I've got no problems with people taking the time and expense to "weathering" their trains or surroundings.  I just think it a little overboard IMO. Maybe it's because I collect classic model cars as well, and can't imagine making them look dirty and weathered.

Mr. Erie, you are obviously welcome to "model" any way you like. However, MOST of us here, that are modeling in 3-Rail SCALE, like our locomotives, cars, buildings, scenery, and track to look as prototypical as possible. Since I model in the mid-1950s time frame, virtually everything I have is a "bit dirty" do to the proximity to steam locomotives, and the steam locomotive servicing facility. Just like the real thing!

 

Concerning the Santa Fe diesels "with the chrome & stainless", the real ones got pretty dirty operating between California and Chicago. Sure the railroad washed them at each end of their respective runs, but they still got dirty in between.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Concerning the Santa Fe diesels "with the chrome & stainless", the real ones got pretty dirty operating between California and Chicago. Sure the railroad washed them at each end of their respective runs, but they still got dirty in between.

I understand the santa fe diesels got dirty, so do you guys weather and dirty those up as well?  I don't think I've ever seen it done....would kinda defeat the purpose of getting them with that option...if you're TRULY into the prototypical thing, you should scrape the paint finishes, add dents, dings, etc...otherwise the "weathering" is just cosmetic coloring of sorts over pristine metal... (see Bob's Seaboard E7 picture above)....would you really scape up your engine to look realistic like that?

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×